You don't.*Huey » 26 Mar 2025, 1:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Nope. You post yours and let's see if I am right. Also, you will see this:
Last updated March 24th, 2025. This will initially be updated weekly; over time, the website will improve and the updates will converge to real-time.
You said I didn't know. Prove it.
Nope. Prove I don't where it is. At this point you won't because you will look like a bigger *** than you already are . Remember, I don't take orders, commands or directives from ignorant little pissants.
Then get back under the porch.*Huey » 26 Mar 2025, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑ Nope. Prove I don't where it is. At this point you won't because you will look like a bigger *** than you already are . Remember, I don't take orders, commands or directives from ignorant little pissants.
Everyone can see you are lying....
They can see that you're a coward.
FIGURING THAT OUT WOULD TAKE AS LONG AS THE MANY YEARS TAXPAYERS WERE RAPED.
Blackvegetable » 31 Mar 2025, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑ The American economy really is exceptional. It is richer, more innovative, and continues to expand at a high rate compared to most of the developed world. It has been extra special the last 15 years, with its equity market outperforming any other country as growth prospects for China and Europe dimmed.
But it seems exceptionalism might be ephemeral. Uncertainty around trade and the future strength of the dollar has led some big European investors to retreat from American stocks. And the problem may go deeper. Less than 100 days into a second Trump administration, commentators are already discussing the coming end of American exceptionalism.
Is This Really How American Exceptionalism Ends?
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/artic ... -ephemeral
https://youtu.be/Zph7YXfjMhg?si=2DxCYNOaxjqQGRTK
Post the thread title and date of the OP.Vegas » 31 Mar 2025, 9:40 am » wrote: ↑ No thoughts, etc...copy/paste
Same MO. Everyday the evidence of you saying/doing the same redundant **** just piles up.
1. Of course, questions/demands. like always.
Just as predicted. Demand. 100% accuracy.
Veghead: if you post an OP, you answer the damn questions about it. No evasions, no copy-paste, no playing debate referee while refusing to step in the ring. Simple enough, or should I draw it in crayon?
Prediction
You: How can I be certain that it isn't a rule?
Me: Because it doesn't defy reason and logic
You: Does the rule apply to you?
Me: Yes. Now shut up.
Doing so would have driven a spike through the hairy forehead of your "argument".Vegas » 31 Mar 2025, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑ Just as predicted. Demand. 100% accuracy.
Let me remind you of the rule. I even tagged on your predictable response to it, so we can save time:
It's your OP, therefore I shouldn't have an argument. Your job is to defend yours.Blackvegetable » 31 Mar 2025, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑ Doing so would have driven a spike through the hairy forehead of your "argument".
You never have an argument.Vegas » 31 Mar 2025, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑ It's your OP, therefore I shouldn't have an argument. Your job is to defend yours.
Why the **** do you have such a hard time understanding that? Narcissistic pos.
Blackvegetable » 31 Mar 2025, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑ You never have an argument.
Just tantrums.
The minute you admit to the facts, your tantrum is debunked.
Still waiting for you to defend your own OP.Blackvegetable » 31 Mar 2025, 10:43 am » wrote: ↑ You never have an argument.
Just tantrums.
The minute you admit to the facts, your tantrum is debunked.