Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 30 Nov 2024, 1:34 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2024, 1:34 pm

*Huey » 30 Nov 2024, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2024, 1:17 pm

You mean the one's that Deutche Bank was happy to take, adjust and made lots of money of off?  Those? LMAO

The ones costing him 450 million.
 

 

FIFY.  Try again.
 

*Huey » 30 Nov 2024, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2024, 1:35 pm

FIFY.  Try again.

What did I get wrong?

BuckNaked » 30 Nov 2024, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2024, 1:06 pm

if your hate for one man is greater than your love for your country something is wrong

he's a rapist. 

Blackvegetable » 30 Nov 2024, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2024, 2:07 pm

he's a rapist.

He was NEVER convicted of rape.

Blackvegetable » 30 Nov 2024, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2024, 2:07 pm

What did I get wrong?

Another question.  You now what you have to do.

*Huey » 30 Nov 2024, 2:34 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2024, 2:34 pm

Another question.  You now what you have to do.

Hand you another L?

Blackvegetable » 30 Nov 2024, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2024, 2:36 pm

Hand you another L?

Not at all.  You will have to post what I lost. 
 

*Huey » 30 Nov 2024, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2024, 2:37 pm

Not at all.  You will have to post what I lost.

I'd have to chase you down.

Not worth the effort. 
 

Blackvegetable » 30 Nov 2024, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2024, 2:37 pm

I'd have to chase you down.

Not worth the effort.

This is another case if you had something you would have posted it.

*Huey » 30 Nov 2024, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2024, 2:43 pm

This is another case if you had something you would have posted it.

*Huey » 24 Nov 2024, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Nov 2024, 1:16 pm

ConservativeWave » 23 Nov 2024, 5:36 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Nov 2024, 5:36 pm

A New York judge agreed to indefinitely postpone sentencing in a criminal case against President-elect Donald Trump. The judge, Juan Merchan, said he is adjourning a planned Nov. 26 sentencing, and paved the way forward for Trump's lawyers to file a motion to dismiss.

THIS is a case where the NY court of appeals conducted a briefing... where they asked the prosecution QUESTION, after QUESTION relating to:

1)  Why they would file charges against Donald Trump when Deutschbank DID NOT, and said they WOULD NOT, file a complaint !

2)  The COMPETENCY of BOTH Donald Trump AND the Deutschbank... to value the property THEMSELVES... to make their own business decisions, and why "THEY" got involved !

3)  WHY they would file charges, when NO ONE was "Damaged" !  and...

4)  WHERE the justification for a $450 Million settlement came from !

NOW with THIS... it basically looks like THEY SEE the handwriting on the wall... were probably RIPPED a NEW one by the appeals court... and RATHER than embarrass themselves and the NY Courts... that they should NOT sentence, and LET the case be appealed and dismissed !!

AND THAT is EXACTLY what I expect will happen !!

https://www.npr.org/2024/11/22/g-s1-353 ... money-case

Yeah, you would think the lenders would have filed suit but even they said he did nothing wrong.  They got their money back and made money off the deal(s).

People were told he was wrong and without any critical thinking skills the dumb one's ran with it.
 

 

 

*Huey » 30 Nov 2024, 1:17 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2024, 1:17 pm

Blackvegetable » 24 Nov 2024, 12:11 am » wrote: ↑

24 Nov 2024, 12:11 am

You're a **** idiot...

Grifty filed false attestations.

You mean the one's that Deutche Bank was happy to take, adjust and made lots of money of off?  Those? LMAO!

 

@Blackvegetable  

This is my case.  Do I need to dumb it down even further for you?  

Blackvegetable » 30 Nov 2024, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2024, 2:07 pm

he's a rapist. 

 

Says who?

BuckNaked » 30 Nov 2024, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2024, 2:54 pm

Says who?

A jury.

*Huey » 30 Nov 2024, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2024, 2:50 pm

@Blackvegetable  

This is my case.  Do I need to dumb it down even further for you?

You can try to explain why you believe that matters...

Blackvegetable » 30 Nov 2024, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2024, 2:55 pm

You can try to explain why you believe that matters...

Already have.  You are not smart enough to understand or to see it.   Anyhoo, if you have something relevant to bring to the table concerning my position go ahead and bring it.  If not, I am going to enjoy a beer and a movie.

 

*Huey » 30 Nov 2024, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2024, 2:57 pm

Already have.  You are not smart enough to understand or to see it.   Anyhoo, if you have something relevant to bring to the table concerning my position go ahead and bring it.  If not, I am going to enjoy a beer and a movie.

No...you haven't. 

The fact is that it doesn't. 


 

Blackvegetable » 30 Nov 2024, 2:59 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2024, 2:59 pm

No...you haven't. 

The fact is that it doesn't.

You got nuttin' so I will BBL.

Blackvegetable » 30 Nov 2024, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2024, 2:54 pm

A jury.

lol the plaintiff who had a cat named ******?

BuckNaked » 30 Nov 2024, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2024, 3:18 pm

lol the plaintiff who had a cat named ******?

No...a jury...

They found a guy who bragged about "grabbing ******" liable for....you're not gonna believe this...
...Grabbing ******.



 

Blackvegetable » 30 Nov 2024, 3:46 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Nov 2024, 3:46 pm

No...a jury...

They found a guy who bragged about "grabbing ******" liable for....you're not gonna believe this...
...Grabbing ******.

yea in a crowded department store’s dressing room real believable