Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2024, 7:09 pm » wrote: ↑ "Childish" is presuming that your unsupported assertions are fact.
So, DICK-n-MOUTH, tell us WHY that "deficit" had been reduced prior to 1997!!!Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2024, 7:19 pm » wrote: ↑ By the time Clinton and Gingrich reached agreement in the fall of 1997, how much of the deficit bequeathed by Supply Side Idiocy had been eliminated?
You know as little as Goofball.*Beekeeper » 03 Dec 2024, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑ So, DICK-n-MOUTH, tell us WHY that "deficit" had been reduced prior to 1997!!!
Was it perhaps because SUPPLY SIDE ECONOMICS resulted in an INCREASE IN REVENUE or was it due to a CUT IN SPENDING??
GO!!
You're ignorant.*Beekeeper » 03 Dec 2024, 6:43 am » wrote: ↑ "Childish" on your part is FULLY supported by the FACT that you get your *** HANDED TO YOU ON EVERY POST YOU MAKE, DICKFACE!!
ANYONE can read your ****, your incessant questions designed to cover your stupidity, and your posts and replies and determine that you are nothing more than a childish TROLL that pretends to be something you will never be- "smart"!!
And?*Beekeeper » 03 Dec 2024, 7:22 am » wrote: ↑ I was waiting on that one so I could CURD STOMP YOUR *** ONCE AGAIN!!!
THIS is going to leave a MASSIVE MARK, DICKSUCKY BOY!!
https://i.postimg.cc/yxbB48VD/Budget-header.jpg
https://i.postimg.cc/ThM7Wz0k/Clinton-B ... evenue.jpg
Federal Budget Receipts and Outlays: | The American Presidency Project
**** moron.golfboy » 02 Dec 2024, 8:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Your question is based on Post hoc ergo propter hoc argument.
Gingrich was Speaker since 1994, and that is when deficits started decreasing.
You can't.*Beekeeper » 03 Dec 2024, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑ You can't read a chart??
Damn, PIGSTYE, you are ONE ******* PIECE OF VERMIN ****!!
Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2024, 7:49 am » wrote: ↑ You can't.
I don't need it.
Even with your chart in hand, you don't know anything.
I don't see a number*Beekeeper » 03 Dec 2024, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑ Oh the IRONY of how kicking your *** and CURB STOMPING YOU INTO HELL always gets that "you don't know anything" **** VOMITARY!!!
You should get a ton of *** PADDING since this is going to continue UNTIL you learn to SHUT THE **** UP!!
Sucks, huh??
Answer the question asked.*Beekeeper » 03 Dec 2024, 7:50 am » wrote: ↑ And just so you know, it was DOWN from 1992 by ~45 Billion.
Sucks, huh?? How all that "supply side" economics kicks your *** every single time!!
golfboy » Yesterday, 8:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Your question is based on Post hoc ergo propter hoc argument.
Gingrich was Speaker since 1994, and that is when deficits started decreasing.
You can't even read your own chart.*Beekeeper » 03 Dec 2024, 8:38 am » wrote: ↑ You've got the link to the chart, so if you want it ANSWERED, learn to read a chart and post it your own damn self, ****!!
See, this is easy!!
I don't see the number.*Beekeeper » 03 Dec 2024, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑ Now that's some mighty NASTY **** you just posted there, DICKFACE!!
Seems if you want an ANSWER then the CHART LINK is right in front of you, which can ONLY MEAN one thing- YOU'RE A **** IDIOT that can't read a chart and post the answer to your own IGNORANT AS **** QUESTION!!
Run along slimy, you got CURB STOMPED AGAIN!!