Do you have a point?*Huey » 25 Nov 2024, 6:09 pm » wrote: ↑ No, you already told me.she ran all the way to South America. LMAO! You were arriedwhat? 5-7 years. I have been with the same women for 27 years.
Bring it on, Binky.
if she thought so little of me why would she leave her daughter with me?*Huey » 25 Nov 2024, 6:28 pm » wrote: ↑ It is quite obvious. You are lacking in the qualities that makes one a man your ex wife ran almost as far as possible to get away from you,
How **** stupid are you, Binky?
Blackvegetable » 25 Nov 2024, 6:31 pm » wrote: ↑ if she thought so little of me why would she leave her daughter with me?
**** moron.
I don't see a case..*Huey » 25 Nov 2024, 6:36 pm » wrote: ↑ To get as far away from our cowardly *** as possible. **** dude, I am guessing you are a control freak in real life, you demand answers to BS questions in real life, and you think you are never wrong in real life as you are here.
Dude, you are a POS in real life and if you find you balls I will tell you that to your face.
But this thread is about the 2nd amendment and illegal immigrants.
Sure..Dude, you are a POS in real life and if you find you balls I will tell you that to your face.
That "thread discipline" thing?But this thread is about the 2nd amendment and illegal immigrants.
Blackvegetable » 25 Nov 2024, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Is the damage done relative to geography?
Just like women, it is the same in every state.
Of courseDeezerShoove » 25 Nov 2024, 6:40 pm » wrote: ↑ One is a specific right. One is allowed by the constitution.
Blackvegetable » 25 Nov 2024, 6:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Of course
Gun ownership - INDIVIDUAL RIGHT, DAMMIT!
Womb ownership - COLLECTIVE RIGHT, YOU FILTHY WHORES!
Cretinous *******...DeezerShoove » 25 Nov 2024, 10:08 pm » wrote: ↑ One is specifically listed as a right.
One needed an "interpretation" so it could be found to be allowed.
You're kind of stuck in your partisan hackery as usual.
Adding an emotional element is all on you, Nancy.
You actually believe PBS is NOT a creeping liberal morass?Blackvegetable » 26 Nov 2024, 6:13 am » wrote: ↑ Cretinous *******...
https://youtu.be/hKfQpGk7KKw?si=KB4uhVVMnuYYaA0S
The "opinions" are those of the guy on the screen. That is the late former CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT, WARREN BERGER.DeezerShoove » 26 Nov 2024, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑ You actually believe PBS is NOT a creeping liberal morass?
Putting up someone else's opinion (yet again) is your spineless, mindless SOP.
Calling someone stupid while too afraid to speak up for yourself?
Your retarded brain must be exposed to the elements. Hannibal is feeding you to you...
Blackvegetable » 25 Nov 2024, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑ Why not demand proof of citizenship to buy a firearm instead?
Squatchman » 25 Nov 2024, 10:27 pm » wrote: ↑ The constitution nor the bill of rights say anything about having to be a citizen in order to be protected by them.
Are they or are they not afforded Miranda rights?
Are they or are they not afforded a trial? The guy that killed Laken Riley got one right?
You can't pick and choose which rights a person gets under the founding documents.
He should appeal the ruling.
No questions, sucky sucky*Beekeeper » 26 Nov 2024, 8:57 am » wrote: ↑ Really now??
When do we DEMAND A PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP or even SIMPLE photo ID to prove you are you before VOTING, which has MORE IMPACT than owning any firearm could ever have??
Blackvegetable » 25 Nov 2024, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑ Why not demand proof of citizenship to buy a firearm instead?
Blackvegetable » 25 Nov 2024, 11:29 am » wrote: ↑ Why not demand proof of citizenship to buy a firearm instead?
Blackvegetable » 25 Nov 2024, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Is the damage done relative to geography?
Just like women, it is the same in every state.
Ewwwww. What a **** PERVERTED PIECE OF **** YOU ARE!!