down from the recent high of 30.7 percent in 2020, but still above the 50-year average of 21.1 percentFuelman » 28 Nov 2024, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑ May as well add in 2024 also:
How much of GDP is government spending in 2024?Total Outlays: Up by 10 Percent in Fiscal Year 2024. Outlays in fiscal year 2024 were $6.8 trillion—$617 billion (or 10 percent) more than in 2023. In total, outlays were equal to 23.4 percent of GDP in 2024, down from the recent high of 30.7 percent in 2020, but still above the 50-year average of 21.1 percent
It's unfortunate that people who claim to know everything usually display some form of retardation.
Blackvegetable » 28 Nov 2024, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑ down from the recent high of 30.7 percent in 2020, but still above the 50-year average of 21.1 percent
who was POTUS in 2020?
You really seem to have a problem with these charts showing Democrats sucking at their job.Blackvegetable » 28 Nov 2024, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑ down from the recent high of 30.7 percent in 2020, but still above the 50-year average of 21.1 percent
who was POTUS in 2020?
Blackvegetable » 28 Nov 2024, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑ down from the recent high of 30.7 percent in 2020, but still above the 50-year average of 21.1 percent
who was POTUS in 2020?

Stumped?nefarious101 » 28 Nov 2024, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑ Hey Dickhead....
Mark Zuckerberg has asked to kiss Trump's ring....says he's all in for MAGA now!!
I'm not the one refusing to answer a simple question about the chart.Fuelman » 28 Nov 2024, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑ You really seem to have a problem with these charts showing Democrats sucking at their job.
History will not be kind.
The one with events corresponding with dates, or the the spoken version?History will not be kind.
Because it's a stupid question, pretty sure everyone knows Trump was President in 2020 dealing with the pandemic.Blackvegetable » 28 Nov 2024, 10:00 am » wrote: ↑ I'm not the one refusing to answer a simple question about the chart.
The one with events corresponding with dates, or the the spoken version?
Stupid question..Fuelman » 28 Nov 2024, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑ Because it's a stupid question, pretty sure everyone knows Trump was President in 2020 dealing with the pandemic.
$21.322T / 2020 nominal gdp
30.7%. / Outlays
$6.54T. / Money spent
$29.168T. / 2024 nominal gdp
23.4% / outlays
$6.82T. / Money spent
Is there a rocket scientist in the house that can pick out who spent more money even though the pandemic is long gone?
Blackvegetable » 28 Nov 2024, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑ Stupid question..
You were saying?
The issues caused by Covid didn't hop on Grifty's plane when he left office, in disgrace, in Jan 2021.
Obama's last budget fell just short of 4 trillion.
Do you REALLY want to compare 4 year growth rates of Federal Spending?
I've invited that discussion for a long time. Here, kitty....
No point in continuing to answer questions if you're gonna lie about being answered.
All that really matters is that current level of spending along with a $1.9 trillion deficit sent you **** packing.Blackvegetable » 28 Nov 2024, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑ Stupid question..
You were saying?
The issues caused by Covid didn't hop on Grifty's plane when he left office, in disgrace, in Jan 2021.
Obama's last budget fell just short of 4 trillion.
Do you REALLY want to compare 4 year growth rates of Federal Spending?
I've invited that discussion for a long time. Here, kitty....
How the **** would a slack jawed rube like you know what matters?Fuelman » 28 Nov 2024, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑ All that really matters is that current level of spending along with a $1.9 trillion deficit sent you **** packing.
Maybe people aren't as innumerate as you believe
He is one of the idiots who told us that people shopping for groceries, paying bills, etc were not seeing higher prices. He used a regional market that has a unique business model to prove it. I guess the voters gave him a big FU!Fuelman » 28 Nov 2024, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑All that really matters is that current level of spending along with a $1.9 trillion deficit sent you **** packing.Blackvegetable » 28 Nov 2024, 10:37 am » wrote: ↑ Stupid question..
You were saying?
The issues caused by Covid didn't hop on Grifty's plane when he left office, in disgrace, in Jan 2021.
Obama's last budget fell just short of 4 trillion.
Do you REALLY want to compare 4 year growth rates of Federal Spending?
I've invited that discussion for a long time. Here, kitty....
Maybe people aren't as innumerate as you believe
I see the meltdown continues.Blackvegetable » 28 Nov 2024, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑How the **** would a slack jawed rube like you know what matters?Fuelman » 28 Nov 2024, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑ All that really matters is that current level of spending along with a $1.9 trillion deficit sent you **** packing.
Maybe people aren't as innumerate as you believe
We get it!Blackvegetable » 28 Nov 2024, 11:06 am » wrote: ↑ How the **** would a slack jawed rube like you know what matters?
Here we go again.Fuelman » 28 Nov 2024, 11:13 am » wrote: ↑ We get it!
You affirm the current government spending levels and $1.9 Trillion deficit.
What level did you say you were?
I'll consider that a WIN!Blackvegetable » 28 Nov 2024, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑ Here we go again.
Have you ever cast a vote for a POTUS who bequeathed a smaller deficit to his successor than the one he inherited?
Why?