That analysis is incorrect.AtticusFinch » 03 Dec 2024, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑ Jury did not find that Carroll proved rape
While the jury did not find that Carroll had proven rape, it did find that she proved Trump committed sexual abuse.
The jury had been instructed that a person is liable for sexual abuse when they subject another person to sexual contact without consent.
Under New York law, “sexual contact” means “any touching of the sexual or other intimate parts of a person for the purpose of gratifying the sexual desire of either party.”
The state’s law says that a person is liable for rape when a person forces sexual intercourse with another person without their consent. For the purposes of this law, “sexual intercourse” means “any penetration, however slight, of the penis into the vaginal opening.”
Both sexual abuse and rape are sexual offenses in New York.
Jury did not find that Carroll proved rapeWhile the jury did not find that Carroll had proven rape, it did find that she proved Trump committed sexual abuse.The jury had been instructed that a person is liable for sexual abuse when they subject another person to sexual contact without consent.Under New York law, “sexual contact” means “any touching of the sexual or other intimate parts of a person for the purpose of gratifying the sexual desire of either party.”The state’s law says that a person is liable for rape when a person forces sexual intercourse with another person without their consent. For the purposes of this law, “sexual intercourse” means “any penetration, however slight, of the penis into the vaginal opening.”Both sexual abuse and rape are sexual offenses in New York.
You say you watch CNN....Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2024, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑ That analysis is incorrect.
It is also superceded by subsequent events, specifically Team Grifty's motion to reduce the verdict. The jury awarded 2 million for a reason.
So now you support the jury?Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2024, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑ That analysis is incorrect.
It is also superceded by subsequent events, specifically Team Grifty's motion to reduce the verdict. The jury awarded 2 million for a reason.
Don't "so..." me, Hole.AtticusFinch » 03 Dec 2024, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑ So now you support the jury?
The jury said rape was not proven...
No...I say I DON'T watch CNN.AtticusFinch » 03 Dec 2024, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑ You say you watch CNN....
That's THEIR link..
https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/09/politics ... index.html
Could have sworn you stated you watched CNN, read the NY Times and Wa PostBlackvegetable » 03 Dec 2024, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑ No...I say I DON'T watch CNN.
You DON'T say how many hours of FOX you guzzle every day.
Nod.
The jury said rape was not proven...Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2024, 11:16 am » wrote: ↑ Don't "so..." me, Hole.
For what specific act alleged did the jury find Grifty liable.
Grifty isn't paying 2 million for what the jury DIDN'T find, Hole.
Not rape...Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2024, 11:36 am » wrote: ↑ Grifty isn't paying 2 million for what the jury DIDN'T find, Hole.
For what specific act of sexual abuse was Grifty found liable?
Your recall sucksAtticusFinch » 03 Dec 2024, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑ Could have sworn you stated you watched CNN, read the NY Times and Wa Post
So you never said you read the NY Times and Was Post?
What DID the jury say was proven, Hole?
I cut cable 15 yrs ago
I read.
You cut cable 15 years ago...