Cannonpointer » 07 Dec 2024, 8:05 pm » wrote: ↑ Ya know who deals in rumors, ****?
British school girls.
"Have you huhd the latest rewmah?"
Get your ****** looked at, chick. It's running.
The very DEFINITION of butt hurt is breathlessly repeating unattributed "rumors," you stupid **** girl.

Cannonpointer » 07 Dec 2024, 11:30 pm » wrote: ↑ He was not skans. He would never use a sok. His brain was not big enough, and his ego was not small enough.
He defended torture, as small men will, by playing the big tough man. He was a drunk, and a shell, and he insisted that he was a libertardian of some stripe. He defended the notion that there existed some particular flavor of libertardians that believe in torturing people suspected of being tourists.
He was quite the fruitcake.
I do in fact have extremely high regard for Putin.nefarious101 » 08 Dec 2024, 6:44 am » wrote: ↑ What about you girls.....you all worship a third world dictator named Pootin'...what?....is he named after a fart?
oh praise the almighty Fart!....take a whiff
He wasn't, but Chunk was.DeezerShoove » 08 Dec 2024, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑ Was he one of those that got into veiled threats as well?
Hinting that he could find out who you are...stuff like that. Very scary-secret menacing.![]()
I know he was immersed in all the **** background of .org, .net's breakaway, feuds.
Wasn't he your pal? . . .
Cannonpointer » 07 Dec 2024, 11:30 pm » wrote: ↑ He was not skans. He would never use a sok. His brain was not big enough, and his ego was not small enough.
He defended torture, as small men will, by playing the big tough man. He was a drunk, and a shell, and he insisted that he was a libertardian of some stripe. He defended the notion that there existed some particular flavor of libertardians that believe in torturing people suspected of being tourists.
He was quite the fruitcake.
Cannonpointer » 08 Dec 2024, 9:23 pm » wrote: ↑ I do in fact have extremely high regard for Putin.
I'm not a programmed ape, you see.
And unlike you, I do not make baseless claims on a regular basis that excite the derision of anyone not at the effect of extremely weak propaganda.

Wow just "WOW" I mean holy freaking crapnefarious101 » 09 Dec 2024, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑ Hey Karen....
Yes you do....he be Pootin' and you be sniffin'.....breath deeply!

Carrion...
Give us an example, weak ***.nefarious101 » 09 Dec 2024, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑Yes you do....Cannonpointer » 08 Dec 2024, 9:23 pm » wrote: ↑ And unlike you, I do not make baseless claims on a regular basis that excite the derision of anyone not at the effect of extremely weak propaganda.
He and I scrapped 3-4 times. He was an was easy puzzle to complete.Cannonpointer » 07 Dec 2024, 11:30 pm » wrote: ↑ He was not skans. He would never use a sok. His brain was not big enough, and his ego was not small enough.
He defended torture, as small men will, by playing the big tough man. He was a drunk, and a shell, and he insisted that he was a libertardian of some stripe. He defended the notion that there existed some particular flavor of libertardians that believe in torturing people suspected of being tourists.
He was quite the fruitcake.
Yup - a slug. And impenetrably ignorant. He would rather be "right" than correct.Sumela » 09 Dec 2024, 8:33 pm » wrote: ↑ He and I scrapped 3-4 times. He was an was easy puzzle to complete.
Bush/Cheney 101. All the same myths, cliches, jingoism. No nuance.
Hey Karen Pointer

Yes sir....Teacher mirrored 90% of the cons here. "'nuke'em!!" Meatheads.Cannonpointer » 09 Dec 2024, 10:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Yup - a slug. And impenetrably ignorant. He would rather be "right" than correct.
That is not an example. I can give examples of you spewing propaganda. You claimed I do that, too.nefarious101 » 10 Dec 2024, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑ Hey Karen Pointer
OK....You!
You assume and emotionalize rather than think it out....I someone says something you only hear what the voice in your head says...then assume and emotionalize.
"BV the Dickhead"..."Love Sumela of Dick"...."Princess Righteous"...."Bigfoot in a Dress"....Maineman....all peas in a pod
Cannonpointer » 10 Dec 2024, 9:46 pm » wrote: ↑ That is not an example. I can give examples of you spewing propaganda. You claimed I do that, too.
When challenged, you groused. You did not put up, so you should shut up.

FULL MODE?nefarious101 » 11 Dec 2024, 2:13 pm » wrote: ↑ Well karen...some of us don't have credibility issues....but most of you do

Sumela » 11 Dec 2024, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑ FULL MODE?
We wrecked you in the FULL MODE thread....
you ran and hid for 2 months.......![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Your credibility was SHAT ON HARD!

I know....nefarious101 » 11 Dec 2024, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑ I was gutted.
Embarrassed...FULL MODE.
So I ran and hid for 2 months.