Liberal Forum

*GHETTOBLASTER » 02 Dec 2024, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2024, 7:12 am

My dog owns more property than that.....and in a much nicer neighborhood 

Shared wall thinks he is getting a dig in on me.  My wife and I decided when we had a house built 7 years ago that we wanted a small plot because we were tired of maintaining a yard.  NOt sure how something we wanted is supposed to be insult.  But, he is not smart.  

Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2024, 6:53 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2024, 6:53 am

Fact, 0.16th of an acre..

wow brown, you mow that massive piece of real estate?

*GHETTOBLASTER » 02 Dec 2024, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2024, 7:12 am

My dog owns more property than that.....and in a much nicer neighborhood 

 
 
 

DeezerShoove » 02 Dec 2024, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2024, 7:30 am

What the **** is 0.16th of something?

 space filled in brown's cranium?
 

ROG62 » 02 Dec 2024, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2024, 9:50 am

wow brown, you mow that massive piece of real estate?

The pigpile on Tiny continues.

 

*Huey » 02 Dec 2024, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2024, 9:43 am

Shared wall thinks he is getting a dig in on me.  My wife and I decided when we had a house built 7 years ago that we wanted a small plot because we were tired of maintaining a yard.  NOt sure how something we wanted is supposed to be insult.  But, he is not smart.

:rofl:  

ROG62 » 02 Dec 2024, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2024, 9:50 am

Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2024, 6:53 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2024, 6:53 am

Fact, 0.16th of an acre..

wow brown, you mow that massive piece of real estate?

 

 

ROG62 » 02 Dec 2024, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2024, 9:51 am

*GHETTOBLASTER » 02 Dec 2024, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2024, 7:12 am

My dog owns more property than that.....and in a much nicer neighborhood 

 
 
 

 

 

ROG62 » 02 Dec 2024, 9:54 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2024, 9:54 am

DeezerShoove » 02 Dec 2024, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2024, 7:30 am

What the **** is 0.16th of something?

 space filled in brown's cranium?
 

 

ROG62+17 minutes ago

So **** g'ddammned stupid 

BV still getting his *** kicked.

*Beekeeper » 01 Dec 2024, 7:38 am » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2024, 7:38 am

His nomination and the resulting LWNJ meltdowns are 100% proof that Trump has picked the right guy to not just clean up the FBI, but to put the ones who are trying to use it as the INTIMIDATION UNIT/GESTAPO of the DEMOCRAT FASCIST NAZI PARTY in prison!!

McCabe's meltdown was absolute GOLD!! I imagine Andy is lawyering up massively about right now too!!!!..........

https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/1 ... l-n2648457

And why is Patel so damn good a pick?? Well, this is why!!.........

https://twitter.com/EndWokeness/status/ ... l-n2182656

I think the Deep State "SWAMP" is in a complete PANIC MELTDOWN mode.... and they SHOULD be ! 

They have spent the last 20+ years ABUSING their power, Obstructing Justice, DOING whatever in the HELL they DAMNED WELL wanted to do... WITHOUT any "Guide rails"... and the last 10 years WAS ENOUGH for the American people... and NOW... the GRIM REAPER is in the HOUSE !

Donald Trump said he would drain the swamp in 2016, but was prevented from doing so by the "Swamp" itself...  a Weaponized DOJ and FBI, that worked to CREATE accusations that would undermine Trump... with: 1) the Mueller Investigation, 2) Illegal FISA wiretaps that were then released to the FAKE News Media, which then... 3) Reported them in a manner to EMBARRASS and UNDERMINE the Trump administration... 4) TWO (2) impeachment trials that were done in SECRET, a signed letter from 52 Deep State members, who SWORE the Hunter laptop was Russian Disinformation (they lied), and 5) Five (5) lawsuits and court SHOW TRIALS, done by the Deep State, to indict, convict, and PREVENT Trump from ever being elected President again... WHICH FAILED UTTERLY !!

Well, it's 2024 now, and Donald Trump is AGAIN the President Elect, with an EVEN MORE powerful mandate than in 2016... and BOTH houses of congress to boot !! 

BUCKLE UP *** HOLES !!  JUDGEMENT DAY is COMING !!

*Huey » 01 Dec 2024, 2:39 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Dec 2024, 2:39 pm

I see you still haven't read the citation.

Patel is particularly worrisome. Don’t listen to me; listen to Trump’s former attorney general, William P. Barr, who objected to Trump’s first-term efforts to install Patel in the No. 2 job at the FBI. In his memoir, Barr said he told then-White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows that Patel would get the deputy job “over my dead body.”

Patel, Barr wrote, “had virtually no experience that would qualify him to serve at the highest level of the world’s preeminent law enforcement agency. The very idea of moving Patel into a role like this showed a shocking detachment from reality.”


 https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... qualified/



So **** g'ddammned stupid 

Deezer Shoove » 02 Dec 2024, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2024, 7:30 am

What the **** is 0.16th of something?

 

Humanity.

Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2024, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2024, 10:38 am

Patel is particularly worrisome. Don’t listen to me; listen to Trump’s former attorney general, William P. Barr, who objected to Trump’s first-term efforts to install Patel in the No. 2 job at the FBI. In his memoir, Barr said he told then-White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows that Patel would get the deputy job “over my dead body.”

Patel, Barr wrote, “had virtually no experience that would qualify him to serve at the highest level of the world’s preeminent law enforcement agency. The very idea of moving Patel into a role like this showed a shocking detachment from reality.”

 https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... qualified/

So **** g'ddammned stupid

So now you a fan of Barr.  It is like your on again off again Bromance with Bolton.

*Huey » 02 Dec 2024, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2024, 10:51 am

So now you a fan of Barr.  It is like your on again off again Bromance with Bolton.

What informs your opinion of Patel?

Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2024, 10:57 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2024, 10:57 am

What informs your opinion of Patel?

Post my opinion and we will discuss.  All I posted was his qualifications.  Plus, you have words to address from 13 days ago.   

*Huey » 02 Dec 2024, 11:01 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2024, 11:01 am

Post my opinion and we will discuss.  All I posted was his qualifications.  Plus, you have words to address from 13 days ago.

You are inviting me to post and discuss something you insist doesn't exist - in supposed exchange for the source of what you have yet to post.

Just answer the question, Runny.


 

Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2024, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2024, 11:12 am

You are inviting me to post and discuss something you insist doesn't exist - in supposed exchange for the source of what you have yet to post.

Just answer the question, Runny.

You're a petulant piss ant....go do something positive instead of posting drivel 20 hours a day.

Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2024, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2024, 10:38 am

Patel is particularly worrisome. Don’t listen to me; listen to Trump’s former attorney general, William P. Barr, who objected to Trump’s first-term efforts to install Patel in the No. 2 job at the FBI. In his memoir, Barr said he told then-White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows that Patel would get the deputy job “over my dead body.”

Patel, Barr wrote, “had virtually no experience that would qualify him to serve at the highest level of the world’s preeminent law enforcement agency. The very idea of moving Patel into a role like this showed a shocking detachment from reality.”

 https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... qualified/

So **** g'ddammned stupid

There were LOTS of Trump appointees in the 1st administration that were NOTHING more than establishment PLANTS... who did their best to subvert, and derail the Trump agenda... THAT is changing this time.. and THAT is the main reason that you hear so many CRIES of TERROR from the Liberals... THEY KNOW:  1) They will NOT have the PLANTS all thru-out the administration, 2) They will NOT be able to influence or de-rail ANYTHING, 3) They will not be able to leak and embarrass ANYONE, and 4) Trumps agenda will move forward, inevitably, toward COMPLETE implementation... VERY QUICKLY !!

NO ONE can stop Trump, unless the"WE the PEOPLE" want him to STOP... and I ONLY see the exact OPPOSITE happening !!

BUCKLE UP !!
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Dec 2024, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2024, 11:12 am

You are inviting me to post and discuss something you insist doesn't exist - in supposed exchange for the source of what you have yet to post.

Just answer the question, Runny.


 

 

I haven't offered an opinion of the nomination.  But, you do have some words you need to stop running from dating back 13 days.  So you calling someone Runny is hilarious.  

ConservativeWave » 02 Dec 2024, 11:25 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2024, 11:25 am

There were LOTS of Trump appointees in the 1st administration that were NOTHING more than establishment PLANTS... who did their best to subvert, and derail the Trump agenda... THAT is changing this time.. and THAT is the main reason that you hear so many CRIES of TERROR from the Liberals... THEY KNOW:  1) They will NOT have the PLANTS all thru-out the administration, 2) They will NOT be able to influence or de-rail ANYTHING, 3) They will not be able to leak and embarrass ANYONE, and 4) Trumps agenda will move forward, inevitably, toward COMPLETE implementation... VERY QUICKLY !!

NO ONE can stop Trump, unless the"WE the PEOPLE" want him to STOP... and I ONLY see the exact OPPOSITE happening !!

BUCKLE UP !!

You're a reflexively stupid ****.

Barr was Grifty's choice because he had recently gone public in his belief that POTUS can't be prosecuted.
 

*Huey » 02 Dec 2024, 11:35 am » wrote: ↑

02 Dec 2024, 11:35 am

I haven't offered an opinion of the nomination.  But, you do have some words you need to stop running from dating back 13 days.  So you calling someone Runny is hilarious.

I haven't offered an opinion of the nomination

of course not...you don't take stands....you just hurl uninformed slogans at those who do, then run.

But, you do have some words you need to stop running from dating back 13 days. 

No...I don't....

but there IS a dedicated thread (and a series of unambiguous lies) from which you are doing your Runny thing.

So you calling someone Runny is hilarious.

Have I answered the question in the OP?