Liberal Forum

*Huey » 04 Dec 2024, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 11:18 am

See the Jury finding.  First question.

Irrelevant. 

It's not about what the jury DIDN'T find, Toady.
 

Str8tEdge » 04 Dec 2024, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 11:12 am

That’s not a criminal conviction, *******. There’s a reason no one in the media calls him a rapist.

What DO you call someone found liable for an act defined as rape?

Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2024, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 11:53 am

Kaplan didn't do anything except explain why the jury awarded 2 million.

If Kaplan used the same standard of proof against you, to accuse you of rape...you would be screaming bloody murder.
I know this, you know this and so does everyone else who knows what a totally desperate liar you are.
 

Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2024, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 11:54 am

Irrelevant. 

It's not about what the jury DIDN'T find, Toady.

Yes, it is.  And also see the link I posted defining digital penetration.

Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2024, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑

03 Dec 2024, 9:00 am

Tell me about "the Rule of Law", Rubes.

Go on.

I find the reaction on both sides of the aisle, particularly the dems, hilarious.  Anyone with any common sense knew that Biden was most likely going to do this regardless of what he said publicly.  

Blackvegetable » 03 Dec 2024, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑

03 Dec 2024, 9:52 am

Is Digital Penetration rape, Duck?

If Kaplan used the same standard of proof against you, to accuse you of rape...you would be screaming bloody murder.
there is no proof that Trump finger banged your professional rape victim.
I know this, you know this and so does everyone else who knows what a totally desperate liar you are.
 
 

Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2024, 11:55 am » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 11:55 am

What DO you call someone found liable for an act defined as rape?

Since civil courts don’t carry the actual burden of a criminal conviction, nothing you **** retarded moron. 

BV thinks some **** rabid leftist judge says Trump is a rapist with ZERO actual evidence other than the testimony of a PROVEN LIAR who’s said the same thing about multiple people equals Trump being a rapist.

IF the judge thought that, why was Trump never **** charged???? Because there’s no actual evidence.

*GHETTOBLASTER » 04 Dec 2024, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 11:56 am

If Kaplan used the same standard of proof against you, to accuse you of rape...you would be screaming bloody murder.
I know this, you know this and so does everyone else who knows what a totally desperate liar you are.

Kaplan has nothing to do with "the standard of proof"

RebelGator » 03 Dec 2024, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑

03 Dec 2024, 9:50 am

In Democrat jurisdictions, the rule of law means jack schitt....why aren't you aware of things, are you stupid?

I use Z to the 23power!      
 

Str8tEdge » 04 Dec 2024, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 12:39 pm

Since civil courts don’t carry the actual burden of a criminal conviction, nothing you **** retarded moron.

Civil courts are also "finders of fact", Nursey.

Your ignorance is tedious. 
 

*Huey » 04 Dec 2024, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 12:19 pm

I find the reaction on both sides of the aisle, particularly the dems, hilarious.  Anyone with any common sense knew that Biden was most likely going to do this regardless of what he said publicly.

You would...it is why you are "Toady"
 

*Huey » 04 Dec 2024, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 11:58 am

Yes, it is.  And also see the link I posted defining digital penetration.

Glad you agree.

And also see the link I posted defining digital penetration.

So?

Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2024, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 1:02 pm

Civil courts are also "finders of fact", Nursey.

Your ignorance is tedious.

No they aren't. They determine what the preponderance of evidence points at. In doing so, they may determine something factual, but the two aren't the same. If civil courts had to determine facts, there would be no requirement for criminal courts, as the evidentiary standard of a civil court would be sufficient for both

Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2024, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 1:02 pm

Civil courts are also "finders of fact", Nursey.

Your ignorance is tedious.

If the "facts" actually supported Trump raping her, there would have been criminal charges.

2. As pointed out before, not even the jury believed the made up rape accusations, ****. 

 

The jury rejected her rape claim, but found Trump liable for a lesser degree of sexual abuse than rape

From wkipedia no less.      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/E._Jean_C ... d_J._Trump

BV is a proven liar.
 

JustinSane » 04 Dec 2024, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 1:11 pm

No they aren't. They determine what the preponderance of evidence points at. In doing so, they may determine something factual, but the two aren't the same. If civil courts had to determine facts, there would be no requirement for criminal courts, as the evidentiary standard of a civil court would be sufficient for both

No they aren't.

wait for it..

They determine what the preponderance of evidence points at.

Idiots must never presume to explain anything, ever.

In doing so, they may determine something factual, but the two aren't the same

The findings of a civil proceeding constitute the facts of the matter.
It is why Grifty is on the hook for 100 million.

If civil courts had to determine facts, there would be no requirement for criminal courts, as the evidentiary standard of a civil court would be sufficient for both

This is idiotic.

The reason criminal trials have a higher standard of evidence is because the defendant's liberty is at stake.

 

Str8tEdge » 04 Dec 2024, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 1:15 pm

If the "facts" actually supported Trump raping her, there would have been criminal charges.

2. As pointed out before, not even the jury believed the made up rape accusations, ****.

You don't know a **** thing about this.

Get back to washing your crocs...
 
 

Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2024, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 1:31 pm

You don't know a **** thing about this.

Get back to washing your crocs...

Did a civil jury find Trump liable for rape? 

1. Yes, I’m a liar. 


2. No, I’m a liar.

Str8tEdge » 04 Dec 2024, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 1:35 pm

Did a civil jury find Trump liable for rape? 

1. Yes, I’m a liar. 

2. No, I’m a liar.

Have you read the judge's response to Team Grifty's petition?