How did that work for you?Str8tEdge » 04 Dec 2024, 2:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Neither does the judges obviously warped opinion, moron.
YOU ARE A **** PROVEN LIAR, BITCH.
jerrab » 04 Dec 2024, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑ he was married then
-------------------------------------------NEW YORK (AP) — A jury found Donald Trump liable Tuesday for sexually abusing advice columnist E. Jean Carroll in 1996, awarding her $5 million in a judgment that could haunt the former president as he campaigns to regain the White House.The verdict was split: Jurors rejected Carroll’s claim that she was raped, finding Trump responsible for a lesser degree of sexual abuse. The judgment adds to Trump’s legal woes and offers vindication to Carroll, whose allegations had been mocked and dismissed by Trump for years.
The fact I caught you lying?
Was your sentence reducedStr8tEdge » 04 Dec 2024, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑ The fact I caught you lying?
It’s expected. I take no pleasure in it.
Has nothing to do with your words from 15 days ago.
It has everything to do with your lying....and cowardice...
I just reposted what you claim I am lying about. On the thread of record.Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2024, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑ It has everything to do with your lying....and cowardice...
*Huey » 04 Dec 2024, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑ I have no issue with your citation. As a matter of fact that looks like the same source I use.
So was Clinton. And I voted for him. Twice.
No, that thread is defunct.*Huey » 04 Dec 2024, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑ I just reposted what you claim I am lying about. On the thread of record.

I’m surprised you believe anything your MSM masters haven’t told you. I have no criminal record, dork.
jerrab » 04 Dec 2024, 3:01 pm » wrote: ↑ trump does not care about his wives.
he had an affair with marla when married to ivana, divorced ivana, married marla then divorced marla married melania had an affair with stormy while melania was giving birth to barron.
.. then you agree, that if that's the case, there is no reason for a criminal court. All facts can be determined by the evidentiary standard of a civil courtBlackvegetable » 04 Dec 2024, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑ That's correct...
In a civil trial facts are established by the preponderance of the evidence...
They remain facts.
As long as you bring it up the thread of record will be bumped.Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2024, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑ No, that thread is defunct.
The OP has been disproven.
All that remains are your lies and diversions.
There is a thread where your question has been invited for lo these many days. But you are too scairt.
I got it.*Huey » 04 Dec 2024, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑ As long as you bring it up the thread of record will be bumped.