Liberal Forum

JustinSane » 04 Dec 2024, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 3:03 pm

.. then you agree, that if that's the case, there is no reason for a criminal court. All facts can be determined by the evidentiary standard of a civil court

No...you're an idiot.

In order to deprive a defendant of their LIBERTY a higher standard of evidence is required. 

But that does NOT mean that civil courts establish something else.


 

Str8tEdge » 04 Dec 2024, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 3:03 pm

I’m surprised you believe anything your MSM masters haven’t told you. I have no criminal record, dork.

I'm quoting the presiding judge. 


 

Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2024, 3:08 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 3:08 pm

No...you're an idiot.

In order to deprive a defendant of their LIBERTY a higher standard of evidence is required. 

But that does NOT mean that civil courts establish something else.

Why would a higher standard of evidence be required? If you've established the facts, there's nowhere else to go
 

Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2024, 3:05 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 3:05 pm

I got it.

https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=92389

That is not the thread where the record it.  That is your diversion.  

*Huey » 04 Dec 2024, 3:23 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 3:23 pm

That is not the thread where the record it.  That is your diversion.

You mean where your diversion is..

My answer to the OP is unambiguous. 


 

Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2024, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 3:25 pm

You mean where your diversion is..

My answer to the OP is unambiguous.

That is not my thread started 2 days after your **** up.  


Show me where you were asked about the civil trial prior to your yes answer and I take a week off.  

JustinSane » 04 Dec 2024, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 3:13 pm

Why would a higher standard of evidence be required? If you've established the facts, there's nowhere else to go

I just told you, TWICE.

If you've established the facts, there's nowhere else to go

It's about the Confidence Interval.

 

Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2024, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 3:27 pm

I just told you, TWICE.

It's about the Confidence Interval.

Don't act like you know what a confidence interval is. STFU with that ****. You are clueless. 

*Huey » 04 Dec 2024, 3:26 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 3:26 pm

That is not my thread started 2 days after your **** up.  

Show me where you were asked about the civil trial prior to your yes answer and I take a week off.

No one gives a **** about your thread.

If you have a question, you know where to take it.

https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=92389

then we can go over some of your lies..

Vegas » 04 Dec 2024, 3:28 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 3:28 pm

Don't act like you know what a confidence interval is. STFU with that ****. You are clueless.

You googled it...
can't figure out what it means...

Because you're a **** moron.
 

Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2024, 3:29 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 3:29 pm

No one gives a **** about your thread.

If you have a question, you know where to take it.

https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=92389

then we can go over some of your lies..

STFU BITCH

FJB » 04 Dec 2024, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 3:31 pm

STFU BITCH

Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2024, 3:31 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 3:31 pm

You googled it...
can't figure out what it means...

Because you're a **** moron.

You have absolutely no idea what it means. None!

If I am a moron, then you lost 6 times to one. So, what does that make you? 


Why do you always need to repeat yourself to narcissists?

*Huey » 04 Dec 2024, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 3:03 pm

Go find someone who wishes to argue about that.

not surprising you are fine with it. so much for christian values. republicans can no longer claim they are the christian party.

Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2024, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 3:12 pm

I'm quoting the presiding judge.

Irrelevant. The jury rejected any liability for rape. 

No civil liability.
No criminal charges.
No criminal conviction.

The judges opinion doesn’t change the fact Trump is not a rapist. You’re a proven liar. 
 

Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2024, 3:29 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 3:29 pm

No one gives a **** about your thread.

If you have a question, you know where to take it.

https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=92389

then we can go over some of your lies..

 

The other thread is not mine either.

No, I will continue to deal with the thread of record that shows running from your words.   I tell you what.  Be a man a start a thread without PG.  And then I will consider it.  Until then, no.

 

jerrab » 04 Dec 2024, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 3:41 pm

not surprising you are fine with it. so much for christian values. republicans can no longer claim they are the christian party.

I am not a republican nor did I vote for Trump this time around.  As I said, troll someone else who wishes to have this argument.  I also do not push my religious believes on other, whatever those believes may be.

WHat else you got, Troll?

Blackvegetable » 04 Dec 2024, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 3:33 pm

The answer is NO, he wasn't found liable for rape.

You lied.

Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 9:00 am

Tell me about "the Rule of Law", Rubes.

Go on.

Suck my dick with your mother's asshole, ***.

Str8tEdge » 04 Dec 2024, 5:30 pm » wrote: ↑

04 Dec 2024, 5:30 pm

The answer is NO, he wasn't found liable for rape.

You lied.

Answer the question, sniveling bitch