Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2024, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 11:27 am

You shouldn't post jive from which you will promptly run.

You been watching Good TImes latel?  You are overusing the word "jive".  

How about this jive:Kaplan wrote that the jury’s unanimous verdict was almost entirely in favor of Carroll, except that the jury concluded she had failed to prove that Trump raped her “within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law.”


 The judge said the section requires vaginal penetration by a penis while forcible penetration without consent of the vagina or other bodily orifices by fingers or anything else is labeled “sexual abuse” rather than “rape.”


 He said the definition of rape was “far narrower” than how rape is defined in common modern parlance, in some dictionaries, in some federal and state criminal statutes and elsewhere.


 The judge said the verdict did not mean that Carroll “failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape.’ Indeed … the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”


Or this jive:


Trump’s lawyers were correct in arguing that the $2 million award for sexual abuse would have been excessive if the jury based the compensatory award on a conclusion that Trump had groped Carroll’s breasts through her clothing or similar conduct, the judge said. But, he said, that’s not what the jury found.

*Huey » 05 Dec 2024, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 11:40 am

You been watching Good TImes latel?  You are overusing the word "jive".  

How about this jive:Kaplan wrote that the jury’s unanimous verdict was almost entirely in favor of Carroll, except that the jury concluded she had failed to prove that Trump raped her “within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law.”

 The judge said the section requires vaginal penetration by a penis while forcible penetration without consent of the vagina or other bodily orifices by fingers or anything else is labeled “sexual abuse” rather than “rape.”

 He said the definition of rape was “far narrower” than how rape is defined in common modern parlance, in some dictionaries, in some federal and state criminal statutes and elsewhere.

 The judge said the verdict did not mean that Carroll “failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape.’ Indeed … the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”

Or this jive:

Trump’s lawyers were correct in arguing that the $2 million award for sexual abuse would have been excessive if the jury based the compensatory award on a conclusion that Trump had groped Carroll’s breasts through her clothing or similar conduct, the judge said. But, he said, that’s not what the jury found.

This **** is unresponsive and not worth reading.

Vegas » 05 Dec 2024, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 11:32 am

I actually don't watch it. The title is enough to get the point across. It forces you to read something.

:rofl:  

You don't read your own **** either.

Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2024, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 12:29 pm

 

You don't read your own **** either.

I said watch you ****. 

More evidence that you read at a 4th grade level. 

Vegas » 05 Dec 2024, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 12:39 pm

I said watch you ****. 

More evidence that you read at a 4th grade level.

You don't read your own **** either, Imbecile. 

Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2024, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 1:02 pm

You don't read your own **** either, Imbecile.

I will not entertain your stalking. 

Nobody reads your ****, nor should they. 

If I am an imbecile, then you lost to one 6 times. So, what does that make you? 

Vegas » 05 Dec 2024, 1:10 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 1:10 pm

I will not entertain your stalking. 

Nobody reads your ****, nor should they. 

If I am an imbecile, then you lost to one 6 times. So, what does that make you?

But you stalk every one of my threads.


Moron.
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2024, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 1:20 pm

But you stalk every one of my threads.

Moron.

Nope. You hijack everyone else's thread with nothing but stupid insults and deflections. Thus, I am handing you what you dish out. 

You not handling it is your problem. 

If I am a moron, then you lost...well ****. You know the rest.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHhyPttsGsk

Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2024, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 9:32 am

To whom did Team Grifty direct their petition for relief?

A) the jury

B) you

C) the presiding judge

For extra credit, explain why.

It's an irrelevant question. You're a LIAR and refuse to admit it.

*Huey » 05 Dec 2024, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 9:42 am

He not change his mind.  Even if he knows he is wrong he will just lie about it.

Or deflect endlessly with irrelevant questions.      

Str8tEdge » 05 Dec 2024, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 2:22 pm

Or deflect endlessly with irrelevant questions.    

Homos drive Subaru's         
 

Str8tEdge » 05 Dec 2024, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 2:22 pm

Or deflect endlessly with irrelevant questions.    

Or start a "dedicated" thread.

AtticusFinch » 05 Dec 2024, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 2:23 pm

Homos drive Subaru's       

Wife drives the Subaru. I have an F-150.

*Huey » 05 Dec 2024, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 2:27 pm

Or start a "dedicated" thread.

Anything, but admit he was wrong or caught lying.  

Str8tEdge » 05 Dec 2024, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 2:27 pm

Wife drives the Subaru. I have an F-150.

Your wife has a penis.
 
 

Str8tEdge » 05 Dec 2024, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 2:22 pm

It's an irrelevant question. You're a LIAR and refuse to admit it.

:rofl:  

Vegas » 05 Dec 2024, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 12:39 pm

I said watch you ****. 

More evidence that you read at a 4th grade level.

That high a grade level??

Well, you do have to bear in mind that he went to SLAVE TRADER U!! And that is all the can get to. Otherwise they would have educated grads and they might get something done. As it stands now, all you get is the same regurgitated vomitary from this stupid **** IMBECILE!!

Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2024, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 12:28 pm

This **** is unresponsive and not worth reading.

WHITE GUILT BV  LOOKS LIKE SUCH A RIDICULOUSLY WEAK AND PATHETIC ****** BITCH........https://x.com/TheAlexStrenger/status/18 ... 1433178234     
WHO COULD OF GUESSED HE WOULDN'T BE ABLE  TAKE HIS HUMILIATING DEFEAT LIKE A MAN...?
 

Blackvegetable » 05 Dec 2024, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 10:39 am

Make up your collective minds...

Collective minds are made up following ancestral consensus life isn't self evident time individually adapting to the moment living eternally separate lifetimes now.

*Beekeeper » 05 Dec 2024, 8:05 am » wrote: ↑

05 Dec 2024, 8:05 am

Rule of law BV?? INNOCENT PEOPLE don't need pardons, ASSHOLE!!

CURB STOMPED AGAIN!!

Jonathan Martin of Politico is reporting that Biden WH aides are, according to sources, in fact in discussions about a raft of other, possible pardons:

Joe Biden’s senior aides are conducting a vigorous internal debate over whether to issue preemptive pardons to a range of current and former public officials who could be targeted with President-elect Donald Trump’s return to the White House, according to senior Democrats familiar with the discussions.

Biden’s aides are deeply concerned about a range of current and former officials who could find themselves facing inquiries and even indictments, a sense of alarm which has only accelerated since Trump last weekend announced the appointment of Kash Patel to lead the FBI. Patel has publicly vowed to pursue Trump’s critics.

just like innocent people don't need to plead the fifth?