Liberal Forum

Mrkelly » 17 Dec 2024, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 12:08 pm

  Did you read the link?

The projected reserve depletion date for the combined OASDI trust funds is 2035, a year later than in last year's report.2 Considered on its own, the OASI Trust Fund can pay full benefits until 2033, the same year as projected last year. As in last year's report, the DI Trust Fund is projected to be able to pay full benefits through the end of the 75-year projection period (2098 in this year's report).

Sources of Trust Fund IncomeDuring 2023, an estimated 183 million workers had earnings covered by Social Security and paid $1,233 billion in payroll taxes. Employees pay a 6.2 percent contribution from earnings up to a maximum of $168,600 in 2024, which their employers match. Self-employed workers pay both shares of the contribution, or 12.4 percent. In 2022, an estimated 48 percent of beneficiaries paid income taxes on part of their benefits. Receipts from these taxes go to the OASDI Trust Funds and Medicare's Hospital Insurance Trust  Fund. In 2023, income to the combined OASDI trust funds from the taxation of benefits amounted to $51 billion. The trust funds also earned $67 billion in interest payments on their accumulated reserves.

The pirates want our money put on Wall Street 

Where they can get their greedy little hands on it 

take a look … Republicans are talking about raising the retirement age again to boot

if tRumps stops this **** ( like he promised)

I will give him credit 

I have my doubts 

YOU just TOTALLY VALIDATED WHAT I SAID, ASSHOLE!!

THE TRUST FUNDS ARE GOING BUHBYE IF SOMETHING ISN'T DONE and that means a LOT of SS recipients will see their CHECKS CUT DOWN!!

And all YOU want to do is whine about it instead of OFFERING A SOLUTION!! And blame REPUBLICANS when your own LEFTWING ASSHOLES had every chance in years past to do more than give it lip service.

DO NOTHING and the benefits are cut. FIX IT and something might remain the same. THAT'S what the Trustee's report just said, *******!!

 

jerrab » 17 Dec 2024, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 11:44 am

it is called projection. you idolize slimeball trump so much you think everyone else suffers from hero worship.

I proved that the tariffs from anyone else get shot down as a terrible idea. the only reason you support them is because of trump, which is proof that the tariffs are a terrible terrible idea which will destroy the economy plus american businesses. I pray there is someone in dc with enough balls to stop him  and this **** up plan.

good lord, all you trump supporters are as dumb as rocks.

I can recognize that not everyone loves Trump, only the 75 MILLION VOTERS who elected him see him as a hero and also correctly saw Kamaltoe as an empty-headed whore.

You're just slower to recognize how poorly a campaign she ran than everyone else!

And you have ZERO proof that the coming Trump tariffs are a bad idea.
You'll see it succeed in the very near future, and if you don't, who gives a ****?  Biden and Harris made PLENTY of stupid decisions that I hated and dopes like you supported.  But playtime's over now and adults without dementia will be taking charge in a few weeks.
 

*Beekeeper » 17 Dec 2024, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 12:19 pm

YOU just TOTALLY VALIDATED WHAT I SAID, ASSHOLE!!

THE TRUST FUNDS ARE GOING BUHBYE IF SOMETHING ISN'T DONE and that means a LOT of SS recipients will see their CHECKS CUT DOWN!!

And all YOU want to do is whine about it instead of OFFERING A SOLUTION!! And blame REPUBLICANS when your own LEFTWING ASSHOLES had every chance in years past to do more than give it lip service.

DO NOTHING and the benefits are cut. FIX IT and something might remain the same. THAT'S what the Trustee's report just said, *******!!

  Yur stupid 
 

jerra b » 17 Dec 2024, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 11:44 am

it is called projection. you idolize slimeball trump so much you think everyone else suffers from hero worship.

I proved that the tariffs from anyone else get shot down as a terrible idea. the only reason you support them is because of trump, which is proof that the tariffs are a terrible terrible idea which will destroy the economy plus american businesses. I pray there is someone in dc with enough balls to stop him  and this **** up plan.

good lord, all you trump supporters are as dumb as rocks.

You loath Trump so much you will invent anything that corrupts every generation gap added into opinions to how evolving should work socially beyond genetics works naturally here.

Zeets2 » 17 Dec 2024, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 12:22 pm

I can recognize that not everyone loves Trump, only the 75 MILLION VOTERS who elected him see him as a hero and also correctly saw Kamaltoe as an empty-headed whore.

You're just slower to recognize how poorly a campaign she ran than everyone else!

And you have ZERO proof that the coming Trump tariffs are a bad idea.
You'll see it succeed in the very near future, and if you don't, who gives a ****?  Biden and Harris made PLENTY of stupid decisions that I hated and dopes like you supported.  But playtime's over now and adults without dementia will be taking charge in a few weeks.

I correctly see that if trump painted a big black x on the mona lisa all of you dumb *** trump supporters would say it was an improvement and proves trump's 'genius.'
 

jerrab » 17 Dec 2024, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 1:20 pm

I correctly see that if trump painted a big black x on the mona lisa all of you dumb *** trump supporters would say it was an improvement and proves trump's 'genius.'

Why don't you try using a hypothetical that's actually of any value?
Maybe like simply nominating a candidate who doesn't have dementia, or one who hasn't earned her promotion on her knees with a mouthful of black dick?
 

Zeets2 » 17 Dec 2024, 1:28 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 1:28 pm

Why don't you try using a hypothetical that's actually of any value?
Maybe like simply nominating a candidate who doesn't have dementia, or one who hasn't earned her promotion on her knees with a mouthful of black dick?

there is nothing trump can do which will cause one slight drop of his supporters' infatuation.

something trump takes full advantage of.
 

jerrab » 17 Dec 2024, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 1:31 pm

there is nothing trump can do which will cause one slight drop of his supporters' infatuation.

something trump takes full advantage of.

Sounds like someone is awfully jealous of the strong support that the majority of the country has for our incoming President!

I'll bet that hurts, doesn't it?  You simply scratch your head with wonder as to why a corrupt, demented liar like Biden and a dim-witted whore like Kamala can't achieve that same kind of support that Trump gets, huh?

Nobody pouts quite as well as a liberal loser!   
 

Zeets2 » 17 Dec 2024, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 1:36 pm

Sounds like someone is awfully jealous of the strong support that the majority of the country has for our incoming President!

I'll bet that hurts, doesn't it?  You simply scratch your head with wonder as to why a corrupt, demented liar like Biden and a dim-witted whore like Kamala can't achieve that same kind of support that Trump gets, huh?

Nobody pouts quite as well as a liberal loser! 

hitler was very well liked.

all dictators got their start by getting full support from everyone.

getting full support is step one to becoming a dictator.
 

jerrab » 17 Dec 2024, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 1:58 pm

hitler was very well liked.

all dictators got their start by getting full support from everyone.

getting full support is step one to becoming a dictator.

STFU YOU POS ASSWIPE

jerrab » 17 Dec 2024, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 1:58 pm

hitler was very well liked.

all dictators got their start by getting full support from everyone.

getting full support is step one to becoming a dictator.

Yeah, you're probably right!
Who in their right mind could possibly want the majority of the country to support the President they voted for, knowing full well that German citizens once loved Hitler?

MUCH better to develop and encourage the complete apathy of millions of voters while insulting a few million other potential voters, right?  THAT'S the recipe for victory I'd sure want to follow!      

You stupid libs get more hilarious by the hour!!!
 

Zeets2 » 17 Dec 2024, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 2:06 pm

Yeah, you're probably right!
Who in their right mind could possibly want the majority of the country to support the President they voted for, knowing full well that German citizens once loved Hitler?

MUCH better to develop and encourage the complete apathy of millions of voters while insulting a few million other potential voters, right?  THAT'S the recipe for victory I'd sure want to follow!      

You stupid libs get more hilarious by the hour!!!

you think I give  a **** how many people worship trump? spain loves bull fights. should I love bullfights  because spain loves them? bullfights is animal torture, should I love animal torture because spain loves animal torture??

jerrab » 17 Dec 2024, 1:58 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 1:58 pm

hitler was very well liked.

all dictators got their start by getting full support from everyone.

getting full support is step one to becoming a dictator.

Every post you make is dumber than the last. 

We have a constitution to protect against dictators and care to guess which party repeatedly gets smacked down by the SC? 
 

jerrab » 17 Dec 2024, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 2:10 pm

you think I give  a **** how many people worship trump? spain loves bull fights. should I love bullfights  because spain loves them? bullfights is animal torture, should I love animal torture because spain loves animal torture??

Yeah, I'm pretty sure you do!
You'd give your left nut to have had a Democrat candidate who is as widely loved as Trump is!
Do you have any evidence that would corollate loving bullfights with loving your country's president?

How many of those bulls have denigrated Christians, Jews, gun owners, conservatives, and the working class the way Democrats have?
 

jerrab » 17 Dec 2024, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 2:10 pm

you think I give  a **** how many people worship trump? spain loves bull fights. should I love bullfights  because spain loves them? bullfights is animal torture, should I love animal torture because spain loves animal torture??

What you should do is take some time to figure out why most of the country wants America First policies put in place and illegal aliens removed. 
 

Str8tEdge » 17 Dec 2024, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 2:23 pm

Every post you make is dumber than the last. 

We have a constitution to protect against dictators and care to guess which party repeatedly gets smacked down by the SC?

 trump  has the supreme court in his pocket.

jerrab » 17 Dec 2024, 2:29 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 2:29 pm

 trump  has the supreme court in his pocket.

Dumber and dumber.   

You can do it! Post something even dumber than a Supreme Court owned by a president…..

Zeets2 » 17 Dec 2024, 2:23 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 2:23 pm

Yeah, I'm pretty sure you do!
You'd give your left nut to have had a Democrat candidate who is as widely loved as Trump is!
Do you have any evidence that would corollate loving bullfights with loving your country's president?

How many of those bulls have denigrated Christians, Jews, gun owners, conservatives, and the working class the way Democrats have?

----------------------------------------------------------------------Trump to Allow Killing of Red Wolves; As Few as 30 RemainNorth Carolina's wild red wolves are among the world's most endangered species — yet Trump's U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has proposed drastic changes allowing their killing. It's the opposite of what most people want: More than 98 percent of comments submitted by North Carolinians support the wolves' protection and recovery.

The state's population could be just eight years from extinction, but the wildlife agency wants to eliminate protection for all red wolves wandering off federal property.

"The Trump administration is declaring open season on America's last red wolves," said the Center for Biological Diversity's Perrin de Jong, based in Asheville, N.C. "The Service turned its back on red wolf recovery when it stopped supporting introductions of captive-bred wolves to the wild. Now it wants to drive the last nail into their coffin."---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I wanted a non trump to win the nomination.

tired of all your ****.

 

jerrab » 17 Dec 2024, 2:32 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 2:32 pm

----------------------------------------------------------------------Trump to Allow Killing of Red Wolves; As Few as 30 RemainNorth Carolina's wild red wolves are among the world's most endangered species — yet Trump's U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has proposed drastic changes allowing their killing. It's the opposite of what most people want: More than 98 percent of comments submitted by North Carolinians support the wolves' protection and recovery.

The state's population could be just eight years from extinction, but the wildlife agency wants to eliminate protection for all red wolves wandering off federal property.

"The Trump administration is declaring open season on America's last red wolves," said the Center for Biological Diversity's Perrin de Jong, based in Asheville, N.C. "The Service turned its back on red wolf recovery when it stopped supporting introductions of captive-bred wolves to the wild. Now it wants to drive the last nail into their coffin."---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I wanted a non trump to win the nomination.

tired of all your ****.

****.... those wolves are destroying livestock in NC.

Str8tEdge » 17 Dec 2024, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 2:31 pm

Dumber and dumber.   

You can do it! Post something even dumber than a Supreme Court owned by a president…..

----------------------------------------------------------

https://www.biscaynetimes.com/viewpoint ... but-that-/


 Trump is very proud of the judges that he’s put on the bench, particularly his U.S. Supreme Court justices. He believes “his judges” will protect him. Regrettably, it appears he’s correct.Based on questions from conservative Supreme Court justices during oral arguments April 25, it looks like they may rule Trump has immunity for actions he took in his “official capacity” as president. Defining “official capacity” is the dilemma.One hypothetical scenario presented by a justice questioned whether a U.S. president has immunity if he orders the assassination of a political opponent. Trumps lawyers argued “yes.” This “yes” was supported by at least four justices.Most legal scholars would say that based on our history – revolting from an all-powerful English king – that our legal system is based on no one being above the law. However, our Supreme Court seems inclined to place Trump and future presidents above the law.Conservative justices normally claim they stick to the strict letter of the U.S. Constitution, and this was the reason they provided for shooting down laws permitting abortion. Now, they are reversing themselves and potentially considering adding language to the Constitution that currently does not exist.The U.S. Constitution does not state that a president has absolute immunity. In fact, President Richard Nixon resigned and was pardoned by President Gerald Ford so that he would not be subjected to criminal prosecution. In the Nixon era, it was clear that presidents did not have “absolute immunity.”