Elites don't go to jail. One way or another, Fauci will expire a free man.Skans » 12 Dec 2024, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑ Ok, Pam, what's your plan when Biden issues blanket pardons for people not even accused of a crime? In order to be pardoned, I believe the person has to have been convicted of a crime, or at least acknowledge the crime he/she committed and then accept a pardon of that crime.
What's your plan, Pam? Hope you have a team of Sharks ready. Hope you've thought this through. The real question here is whether the Supreme Court will even take up the issue without at least some attempt by the Justice Department to charge a Biden-flunky with a particular crime.
Why do you people run your ******* mouths?Skans » 12 Dec 2024, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑ Ok, Pam, what's your plan when Biden issues blanket pardons for people not even accused of a crime? In order to be pardoned, I believe the person has to have been convicted of a crime, or at least acknowledge the crime he/she committed and then accept a pardon of that crime.
What's your plan, Pam? Hope you have a team of Sharks ready. Hope you've thought this through. The real question here is whether the Supreme Court will even take up the issue without at least some attempt by the Justice Department to charge a Biden-flunky with a particular crime.
Hey, Grandpa, WHO THE F- CARES ABOUT SOME GUY NAMED "WEINBERGER"? 1992 was over 30 years ago. You might as well be rambling on about James Forrestal.Blackvegetable » 12 Dec 2024, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑ Why do you people run your ******* mouths?
After his resignation as Secretary of Defense, legal proceedings against Weinberger were continued by Independent Counsel Lawrence E. Walsh. On June 17, 1992, Weinberger was indicted on five felony charges related to the Iran-contra affair, including accusations that he had lied to Congress and obstructed Government investigations.[30][31] He was defended by defense attorney Carl Rauh.
Prosecutors brought an additional indictment just four days before the 1992 presidential election. This was controversial because it cited a Weinberger diary entry contradicting a claim made by President George H. W. Bush. Republicans claimed that this action contributed to Bush's later defeat. On December 11, 1992, Judge Thomas F. Hogan threw out this indictment because it violated the five-year statute of limitations and improperly broadened the original charges.[32]
Before Weinberger could be tried on the original charges, he received a pardon on December 24, 1992, from Bush, who had been Reagan's vice president during the scandal.[28][33]
Perhaps. Perhaps the Devil can't keep a repentant sinner in Hell for all eternity either. But, he sure can have a fun time torturing him while he's got 'em.Cannonpointer » 12 Dec 2024, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑ Elites don't go to jail. One way or another, Fauci will expire a free man.
The simple fact is that every last one of these bad actors violated state laws - not just federal. They have victims in all 50 states, and any one of those states could - and will not - indict tomorrow. Biden's pardon is worth only the value of the paper it is written on, in the state of Florida, for example. DeSantis' AG could indict Fauci tomorrow. The evidence is there, the crime is there, the grand jury would need about three minutes if it were shown the evidence by a serious prosecutor.
Elites don't go to jail. One way or another, they keep walking among us.
Skans » 12 Dec 2024, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑ Ok, Pam, what's your plan when Biden issues blanket pardons for people not even accused of a crime? In order to be pardoned, I believe the person has to have been convicted of a crime, or at least acknowledge the crime he/she committed and then accept a pardon of that crime.
What's your plan, Pam? Hope you have a team of Sharks ready. Hope you've thought this through. The real question here is whether the Supreme Court will even take up the issue without at least some attempt by the Justice Department to charge a Biden-flunky with a particular crime.

Skans » 12 Dec 2024, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑ Ok, Pam, what's your plan when Biden issues blanket pardons for people not even accused of a crime? In order to be pardoned, I believe the person has to have been convicted of a crime, or at least acknowledge the crime he/she committed and then accept a pardon of that crime.
What's your plan, Pam? Hope you have a team of Sharks ready. Hope you've thought this through. The real question here is whether the Supreme Court will even take up the issue without at least some attempt by the Justice Department to charge a Biden-flunky with a particular crime.
I agree with this - have said similar things. No more 5th Amendment, unless of course they challenge the pardon.nefarious101 » 12 Dec 2024, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ Drag them in for investigations, put them under oath, force them to tell the truth...since they accepted a pardon they are no longer eligible for the 5th Amendment....if they lie, go after them for perjury.
They wind up implicating a lot of people who don't have pardons or go to prison themselves....and America gets to see the **** show
Skans » 12 Dec 2024, 12:51 pm » wrote: ↑ I agree with this - have said similar things. No more 5th Amendment, unless of course they challenge the pardon.

JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom I never noticed....creepy...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom There’s more than one way to expire.Cannonpointer » 12 Dec 2024, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑ Elites don't go to jail. One way or another, Fauci will expire a free man.
The simple fact is that every last one of these bad actors violated state laws - not just federal. They have victims in all 50 states, and any one of those states could - and will not - indict tomorrow. Biden's pardon is worth only the value of the paper it is written on, in the state of Florida, for example. DeSantis' AG could indict Fauci tomorrow. The evidence is there, the crime is there, the grand jury would need about three minutes if it were shown the evidence by a serious prosecutor.
Elites don't go to jail. One way or another, they keep walking among us.
I bet he lifts.
You are a florida boy, are you not?Skans » 12 Dec 2024, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑ Perhaps. Perhaps the Devil can't keep a repentant sinner in Hell for all eternity either. But, he sure can have a fun time torturing him while he's got 'em.
Cannonpointer » 12 Dec 2024, 8:53 pm » wrote: ↑ You are a florida boy, are you not?
Fauci violated your rights, did he not?
What is your governor doing about it? Biden's pardon means as little to DeSantis as do your violated rights.
You should be leading the charge to get the FL attorney general to convene a grand jury, now that biden fixed the game at the federal level.