Blackvegetable » 15 Dec 2024, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑ We both know he said more than that, ZeroIntegrity
..
You're lying.*Huey » 15 Dec 2024, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑ I know. That is the part you rarely, if ever, post. And it is also why ABC got sued for defamation and settled. So yes, they do go together.
You missed the punchline..AtticusFinch » 14 Dec 2024, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Trump filed a defamation suit against Stephanopoulos after he asserted that Trump was found "liable for rape" in a civil case during a contentious interview with Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., last March.After playing a clip of Mace discussing being a victim of rape, Stephanopoulos asked her, "How do you square your endorsement of Donald Trump with the testimony we just saw?" "You've endorsed Donald Trump for president. Judges and two separate juries have found him liable for rape and for defaming the victim of that rape," Stephanopoulos said, alluding to the legal victory by Trump accuser E. Jean Carroll. Stephanopoulos repeated that claim ten times during his spat with Mace, despite the fact that a jury actually determined Trump was liable for "sexual abuse," which has a distinct definition under New York law.After the federal jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse, but not rape, Judge Lewis Kaplan wrote in a later ruling that just because Carroll failed to prove rape "within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape.’"
https://www.foxnews.com/media/george-st ... ation-suit
Blackvegetable » 15 Dec 2024, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑ You missed the punchline..
The $15m will go towards Trump's future presidential library, US media reported
Blackvegetable » 15 Dec 2024, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑ You missed the punchline..
The $15m will go towards Trump's future presidential library, US media reported
You understand why that's funny, right?
It has taken you so long to figure that out.
So what?Blackvegetable » 15 Dec 2024, 2:11 pm » wrote: ↑ You missed the punchline..
The $15m will go towards Trump's future presidential library, US media reported
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ”*Huey » 15 Dec 2024, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑ The judge in both cases, Lewis Kaplan, has said that the jury's conclusion was that Carroll had failed to prove that Trump raped her "within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law."
https://www.npr.org/2024/12/14/nx-s1-52 ... hanopoulos
Blackvegetable » 15 Dec 2024, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑ “The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ”
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ”*Huey » 15 Dec 2024, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑ There is no L to take. No jury has found trump liable for rape. Even the judge said by NY law she failed to prove that.
He added that the jury clearly found that Trump had “ ‘raped’ her in the sense of that term broader than the New York Penal Law definition.”*Huey » 15 Dec 2024, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑ And the paperwork filed and on record say the jury found him liable for sexual abuse, not rape. Which is why ABC got sued.
Blackvegetable » 15 Dec 2024, 3:14 pm » wrote: ↑ “The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ”
The judge in both cases, Lewis Kaplan, has said that the jury's conclusion was that Carroll had failed to prove that Trump raped her "within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law."Blackvegetable » 15 Dec 2024, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑ He added that the jury clearly found that Trump had “ ‘raped’ her in the sense of that term broader than the New York Penal Law definition.”
But he said that the conduct the jury effectively found Trump liable for — forced digital penetration — meets a more common definition of rape. He cited definitions offered by the American Psychological Association and the Justice Department, which in 2012 expanded its definition of rape to include penetration “with any body part or object.”*Huey » 15 Dec 2024, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑ The judge in both cases, Lewis Kaplan, has said that the jury's conclusion was that Carroll had failed to prove that Trump raped her "within the narrow, technical meaning of a particular section of the New York Penal Law."
So in your make believe Fairy World...simply accusing someone else of rape is all it takes to prove that you were raped by that person.Blackvegetable » 15 Dec 2024, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑ “The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ”