Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Hey Black Veggie...ABC ordered to pay Trump $ 15 million for rape claim.....OOPS!
Hey Black Veggie...ABC ordered to pay Trump $ 15 million for rape claim.....OOPS!
By Atticus Finch
14 Dec 2024 2:41 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
15 Dec 2024 5:27 am
And ABC just gave away $15 million for the hell of it?Blackvegetable » 15 Dec 2024, 6:25 am » wrote: ↑ He told Team Grifty...because they asked him.
You're one world class *******..
Jury said no rape.
15 Dec 2024 5:35 am
That is NOT what the jury said.AtticusFinch » 15 Dec 2024, 6:27 am » wrote: ↑ And ABC just gave away $15 million for the hell of it?
Jury said no rape.
15 Dec 2024 5:39 am
Sucks, cockysucky, tha your CLAIMS of "Trump is a rapist" is EXACTLY the same **** that cost ABC news 15 MILLION PLUS ATTORNEYS FEES!!Blackvegetable » 14 Dec 2024, 4:11 pm » wrote: ↑ None whatsoever.
What you failed to include...
After the federal jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse, but not rape, Judge Lewis Kaplan wrote in a later ruling that just because Carroll failed to prove rape "within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape.’"
Stephanopoulus **** it up. Had he stuck to Kaplan's argument, Grifty would have had no case.
This is why I don't watch TV...too much stupid.
Now, we have the CLAIM Stephy made, and guess the **** what?? THEY SOUND LIKE THEY CAME RIGHT OUT OF YOUR COCK HOLSTER!!
https://x.com/CollinRugg/status/1868034 ... 0310483391
Damn, that's REALLY gonna leave a **** mark!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
15 Dec 2024 5:41 am
So what DID the jury say?? Oh wait!! I have it right here....
https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png
Damn, you get your TIT in a wringer every **** time!!
NO RAPE, ****!! See that JURY VERDICT FORM ABOVE??
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
15 Dec 2024 6:03 am
Yes...it is what they said. A jury must rule in accordance with the laws of the jurisdiction (not some personal definition).
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/0 ... l-00096059
15 Dec 2024 6:07 am
The jury said NO rape..
15 Dec 2024 6:09 am
“Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
15 Dec 2024 6:10 am
You're a chronic liar, Connie.ConsRule » 15 Dec 2024, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑ Yes...it is what they said. A jury must rule in accordance with the laws of the jurisdiction (not some personal definition).
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/0 ... l-00096059
This was a CIVIL matter.
15 Dec 2024 6:13 am
Blackvegetable » 15 Dec 2024, 7:09 am » wrote: ↑ “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
What JUROR/JURY said that dickbreath??
ANY you can find will work!!
Want to read the JURY INSTRUCTIONS?? FROM THE JUDGE NO LESS since he DEFINED RAPE for them as plainly as it could be!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
15 Dec 2024 6:15 am
It makes no difference that it was a civil matter. They jury still had to base their verdict according to the laws of the jurisdiction. The difference between criminal and civil cases is that civil cases cannot include confinement. The jury in that case awarded exactly $0 for rape...because a jury cannot make an award when the find a defendant did not commit what the claimant accused them of doing. I'm not surprised you didn't learn that at Brown's Auto Shop and Institute of Higher Education.Blackvegetable » 15 Dec 2024, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑ You're a chronic liar, Connie.
This was a CIVIL matter.
See link below.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/0 ... l-00096059
15 Dec 2024 6:18 am
The jury said NO rapeBlackvegetable » 15 Dec 2024, 7:09 am » wrote: ↑ “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
And of course when ABC referred to that they were sued and settled quickly..
And apologized as well..
You need to accept you're wrong...
This isn't an opinion debate
The jury said no rape..
When you claim they said differently you're just lying
15 Dec 2024 6:20 am
Those aren't my words.AtticusFinch » 15 Dec 2024, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑ The jury said NO rape
And of course when ABC referred to that they were sued and settled quickly..
And apologized as well..
You need to accept you're wrong...
This isn't an opinion debate
The jury said no rape..
When you claim they said differently you're just lying
They are the words of the presiding judge.
In response to what did Judge Kaplan offer those comments?
15 Dec 2024 6:21 am
Enough of your **** ignorance, Connie.ConsRule » 15 Dec 2024, 7:15 am » wrote: ↑ It makes no difference that it was a civil matter. They jury still had to base their verdict according to the laws of the jurisdiction. The difference between criminal and civil cases is that civil cases cannot include confinement. The jury in that case awarded exactly $0 for rape...because a jury cannot make an award when the find a defendant did not commit what the claimant accused them of doing. I'm not surprised you didn't learn that at Brown's Auto Shop and Institute of Higher Education.
See link below.
https://www.politico.com/news/2023/05/0 ... l-00096059
15 Dec 2024 6:21 am
The jury said NO rape
Wanna see what they checked off?
15 Dec 2024 6:22 am
Are there separate LAWS for "Civil" vs "Criminal" that apply here, ASSHOLE??Blackvegetable » 15 Dec 2024, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑ You're a chronic liar, Connie.
This was a CIVIL matter.
Nope!!
Now, here ARE the exact words given to the JURY BY THE JUDGE, ****.... And I HIGHLIGHTED THE PART YOU WILL HATE THE MOST!!!
Sexual Battery Instructions
The liability questions for Ms. Carroll's sexual battery claim were whether Ms. Carroll proved by a preponderance of the evidence that (1) “Mr. Trump raped Ms. Carroll?”, (2) “Mr. Trump sexually abused Ms. Carroll?”, (3) “Mr. Trump forcibly touched Ms. Carroll?”.42 These three theories of liability (rape, sexual abuse, and forcible touching) were the same three proposed by both parties. As the Court instructed the jury:
“Ms. Carroll claims that Mr. Trump is liable to her for battery on three different and alternative bases, each of which corresponds to a criminal law definition of a different sex crime. Mr. Trump denies that he is liable to her for battery on any of these three different and alternative bases․ Accordingly, the first set of questions in the verdict form has to do with whether or not Ms. Carroll has established that Mr. Trump's conduct, if any, came within any of those criminal law definitions.”43The Court then instructed the jury on the definitions of the three different sex crimes.
On the first question – whether Ms. Carroll proved that Mr. Trump “raped” her – the Court instructed the jury in accordance with the New York Penal Law's definition of rape:44
“In order to establish that Mr. Trump raped her, Ms. Carroll must prove each of two elements by a preponderance of the evidence.The first element is that Mr. Trump engaged in sexual intercourse with her.
The second element is that Mr. Trump did so without Ms. Carroll's consent by the use of forcible compulsion․
‘Sexual intercourse’ means any penetration, however slight, of the penis into the vaginal opening. In other words, any penetration of the penis into the vaginal opening, regardless of the distance of penetration, constitutes an act of sexual intercourse. Sexual intercourse does not necessarily require erection of the penis, emission, or an orgasm.
․I also used the phrase ‘forcible compulsion,’ and what that means is intentionally to compel by the use of physical force.
․If you find that Ms. Carroll has proved by a preponderance of the evidence both of those two elements, you will answer Question 1 ‘yes.’ If you answer Question 1 ‘yes,’ I instruct you that Mr. Trump thus committed battery against Ms. Carroll. There would be no need to consider whether he committed battery on either of the other two alternative bases․ If you find that Ms. Carroll has not proven either of the two elements of rape by a preponderance of the evidence, you must answer ‘no’ to Question 1 and go on to Question 2, which deals with the second of the three alternative bases for the battery claim.”45
Thus, the instructions required the jury to answer Question 1 “No” unless it found that Ms. Carroll had proved that Mr. Trump penetrated her vagina with his penis. Penetration by any other body part did not suffice.
AND WITH THAT, there was NO RAPE ON THE PART OF TRUMP THAT OCCURRED!!
SUCKS, huh, DICKYSUCKYBOY!!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
15 Dec 2024 8:00 am
Kaplin based his opinion on zero evidence.Blackvegetable » 15 Dec 2024, 6:25 am » wrote: ↑ He told Team Grifty...because they asked him.
You're one world class *******..
Period.
Carroll claims she has been sexually assaulted 7 times by 7 different men.
How Ridiculous.
We know why the [[[MSM]]] fail to report that very important detail over and over.
How many guilty verdicts has Kaplin presided over in his court room that were based on zero evidence..?
I think the truthful answer should be NONE until he got the chance to burn Trump.
Kaplan deserves a taste of his own medicine some day....to be found guilty of rape with zero evidence by an angry mob in a back alley.....
15 Dec 2024 8:02 am
It was a jury trial.*GHETTOBLASTER » 15 Dec 2024, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑ Kaplin based his opinion on zero evidence.
Period.
Carroll claims she has been sexually assaulted 7 times by 7 different men.
How Ridiculous.
We know why the [[[MSM]]] fail to report that very important detail over and over.
How many guilty verdicts has Kaplin presided over in his court room that were based on zero evidence..?
I the truthful answer should be NONE until he got the chance to burn Trump.
Kaplan deserves a taste of his own medicine some day....to be found guilty of rape with zero evidence by an angry mob in a back alley.....
You're an ineducable *******.
15 Dec 2024 8:12 am
brown, what you failed to read were the last three (3) lines of the OP...Blackvegetable » 14 Dec 2024, 4:11 pm » wrote: ↑ None whatsoever.
What you failed to include...
After the federal jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse, but not rape, Judge Lewis Kaplan wrote in a later ruling that just because Carroll failed to prove rape "within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape.’"
Stephanopoulus **** it up. Had he stuck to Kaplan's argument, Grifty would have had no case.
This is why I don't watch TV...too much stupid.
"too much stupid" much?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
15 Dec 2024 8:14 am
cling, brown...CLING!!!Blackvegetable » 14 Dec 2024, 4:28 pm » wrote: ↑ You are arguing with your source and the presiding judge.
I'm not liable for Stephanopoulus' stupid.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
15 Dec 2024 8:14 am
None of you imbeciles will ever write anything worth reading for purposes other than comedic.ROG62 » 15 Dec 2024, 9:12 am » wrote: ↑ brown, what you failed to read were the last three (3) lines of the OP...
"too much stupid" much?
Is that clear, JuCo?
Who is online
In total there are 3030 users online :: 8 registered, 15 bots, and 3007 guests
Registered users: Johnny You, ROG62, ConservativeWave, Beekeeper, jerra b, SouthernFried, Cannonpointer, Deezer Shoove
Bots: TTD-Content, DuckDuckGo, ADmantX, DuckDuckBot, curl/7, CensysInspect, YandexBot, Bolt, CriteoBot, proximic, facebookexternalhit, Applebot, Googlebot, bingbot, Mediapartners-Google