nefarious101 » 14 Dec 2024, 4:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Hey Dickhead...
"You got him now"''
better run and get yourself some fake news and start your healing process
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Brown, the verdict is forever written in stone...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom oh the irony...everything you say is "so stupid"...Blackvegetable » 14 Dec 2024, 5:30 pm » wrote: ↑ I would never say anything so stupid.
Now answer the question.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Regardless.
JFC, brown, that's what everyone has been telling you...yet you continually cling to **** that isn't there...so much stupid...Blackvegetable » 14 Dec 2024, 8:03 pm » wrote: ↑ That was for the jury, not the judge, to determine.
You people are so **** g'ddammned stupid
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Kaplin needs to be audited to see if he recieved funds before, during and after this trial....*GHETTOBLASTER » 15 Dec 2024, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑ Regardless.
Judge Kaplin based his opinion [that you treat as fact]on zero evidence.
Period.
Carroll claims she has been sexually assaulted 7 times by 7 different men.
How Ridiculous.
We know why the [[[MSM]]] fail to report that very important detail over and over.
How many guilty verdicts has Kaplin presided over in his court room that were based on zero evidence..?
I think the truthful answer should be NONE until he got the chance to burn Trump.
Both YOU and Kaplan deserve a taste of his own medicine some day....to be found guilty of rape with zero evidence by an angry mob in a back alley.....![]()




JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom kill yourself...please...Blackvegetable » 15 Dec 2024, 7:09 am » wrote: ↑ “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom To whom did Team Grifty address its petition for relief from the $2million dollar judgement?
run, brown, RUN!!!
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom *Beekeeper » 15 Dec 2024, 7:22 am » wrote: ↑ Are there separate LAWS for "Civil" vs "Criminal" that apply here, ASSHOLE??
Nope!!
Now, here ARE the exact words given to the JURY BY THE JUDGE, ****.... And I HIGHLIGHTED THE PART YOU WILL HATE THE MOST!!!
Sexual Battery Instructions
The liability questions for Ms. Carroll's sexual battery claim were whether Ms. Carroll proved by a preponderance of the evidence that (1) “Mr. Trump raped Ms. Carroll?”, (2) “Mr. Trump sexually abused Ms. Carroll?”, (3) “Mr. Trump forcibly touched Ms. Carroll?”.42 These three theories of liability (rape, sexual abuse, and forcible touching) were the same three proposed by both parties. As the Court instructed the jury:
“Ms. Carroll claims that Mr. Trump is liable to her for battery on three different and alternative bases, each of which corresponds to a criminal law definition of a different sex crime. Mr. Trump denies that he is liable to her for battery on any of these three different and alternative bases․ Accordingly, the first set of questions in the verdict form has to do with whether or not Ms. Carroll has established that Mr. Trump's conduct, if any, came within any of those criminal law definitions.”43The Court then instructed the jury on the definitions of the three different sex crimes.
On the first question – whether Ms. Carroll proved that Mr. Trump “raped” her – the Court instructed the jury in accordance with the New York Penal Law's definition of rape:44
“In order to establish that Mr. Trump raped her, Ms. Carroll must prove each of two elements by a preponderance of the evidence.The first element is that Mr. Trump engaged in sexual intercourse with her.
The second element is that Mr. Trump did so without Ms. Carroll's consent by the use of forcible compulsion․
‘Sexual intercourse’ means any penetration, however slight, of the penis into the vaginal opening. In other words, any penetration of the penis into the vaginal opening, regardless of the distance of penetration, constitutes an act of sexual intercourse. Sexual intercourse does not necessarily require erection of the penis, emission, or an orgasm.
․I also used the phrase ‘forcible compulsion,’ and what that means is intentionally to compel by the use of physical force.
․If you find that Ms. Carroll has proved by a preponderance of the evidence both of those two elements, you will answer Question 1 ‘yes.’ If you answer Question 1 ‘yes,’ I instruct you that Mr. Trump thus committed battery against Ms. Carroll. There would be no need to consider whether he committed battery on either of the other two alternative bases․ If you find that Ms. Carroll has not proven either of the two elements of rape by a preponderance of the evidence, you must answer ‘no’ to Question 1 and go on to Question 2, which deals with the second of the three alternative bases for the battery claim.”45
Thus, the instructions required the jury to answer Question 1 “No” unless it found that Ms. Carroll had proved that Mr. Trump penetrated her vagina with his penis. Penetration by any other body part did not suffice.
AND WITH THAT, there was NO RAPE ON THE PART OF TRUMP THAT OCCURRED!!
SUCKS, huh, DICKYSUCKYBOY!!!
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom You reposted it verbatim, you stupid ****...if you're going to actually debate and make a point, put less too much stupid into it...Blackvegetable » 15 Dec 2024, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑ None of you imbeciles will ever write anything worth reading for purposes other than comedic.
Is that clear, JuCo?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Spot on...whigger-central...*GHETTOBLASTER » 15 Dec 2024, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ BV chooses to live where it's 86% White and only 1.3% Black......yet here he is......
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Irrelevant, clinger...but go ahead, dance away...Blackvegetable » 15 Dec 2024, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ To whom did Team Grifty address its petition for relief from the $2million dollar judgement?
A) the jury
B) Dash Riprock
C) You
D) The presiding judge
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Oh, really?
jury...Blackvegetable » 15 Dec 2024, 11:12 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, really?
Then proceed to answer it and let's see.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Wrong.
AtticusFinch » 14 Dec 2024, 3:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Trump filed a defamation suit against Stephanopoulos after he asserted that Trump was found "liable for rape" in a civil case during a contentious interview with Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., last March.After playing a clip of Mace discussing being a victim of rape, Stephanopoulos asked her, "How do you square your endorsement of Donald Trump with the testimony we just saw?" "You've endorsed Donald Trump for president. Judges and two separate juries have found him liable for rape and for defaming the victim of that rape," Stephanopoulos said, alluding to the legal victory by Trump accuser E. Jean Carroll. Stephanopoulos repeated that claim ten times during his spat with Mace, despite the fact that a jury actually determined Trump was liable for "sexual abuse," which has a distinct definition under New York law.After the federal jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse, but not rape, Judge Lewis Kaplan wrote in a later ruling that just because Carroll failed to prove rape "within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape.’"
https://www.foxnews.com/media/george-st ... ation-suit
Suppose you tell us why ABC agreed to settle instead going to trial?Blackvegetable » 15 Dec 2024, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑ Wrong.
The jury doesn't respond to post verdict petitions.
So **** g'ddammned stupid