The Hell You Say!
By Blackvegetable
16 Dec 2024 5:47 pm in No Holds Barred Political Forum
17 Dec 2024 12:06 pm
What Appellate Court?Cedar » 17 Dec 2024, 1:02 pm » wrote: ↑ Appeals to the Appellate court and Supreme Court, He also has another case before Merchan to toss the case entirely.
On what grounds?
CNN — The federal appeals court in Washington, DC, declined to rehear arguments over whether former President Donald Trump can be prohibited from talking about witnesses and court staff while he awaits trial in the special counsel’s January 6 criminal case.Trump has unsuccessfully tried to challenge the gag order placed on him by Judge Tanya Chutkan late last year through appeals.
The 11 judges from the DC Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday declined to touch the case after a three-judge panel previously upheld the gag order against Trump. There were no statements or dissents made by any of the judges
https://www.cnn.com/2024/01/23/politics ... index.html
17 Dec 2024 12:06 pm
have to file? so It hasn't been filed before.. Grasping for straws with string theories.Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2024, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑ He's exhausted his appeals.
He wasn't convicted in a federal court. But it doesn't appear that his efforts are succeeding there either.
He'd have to file a discreet suit in federal court asserting "Civil Rights violation".
So where are your "facts"?
17 Dec 2024 12:12 pm
He can appeal Merchan's decision to the New York Appellate court and if they give him the wrong answer he can appeal to the Supreme Court.Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2024, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑ What Appellate Court?
On what grounds?
CNN — The federal appeals court in Washington, DC, declined to rehear arguments over whether former President Donald Trump can be prohibited from talking about witnesses and court staff while he awaits trial in the special counsel’s January 6 criminal case.Trump has unsuccessfully tried to challenge the gag order placed on him by Judge Tanya Chutkan late last year through appeals.
The 11 judges from the DC Circuit Court of Appeals on Tuesday declined to touch the case after a three-judge panel previously upheld the gag order against Trump. There were no statements or dissents made by any of the judges
Hold your breath on the federal cases, he can pardon himself next month.
17 Dec 2024 12:16 pm
He's done with NY Appellate courts.Cedar » 17 Dec 2024, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑ He can appeal Merchan's decision to the New York Appellate court and if they give him the wrong answer he can appeal to the Supreme Court.
Hold your breath on the federal cases, he can pardon himself next month.
He's finding hostile reception in Federal court.
Which brings us back to "doh".Hold your breath on the federal cases, he can pardon himself next month.
17 Dec 2024 12:22 pm
You're just wrong.Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2024, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑ He's done with NY Appellate courts.
He's finding hostile reception in Federal court.
Which brings us back to "doh".
17 Dec 2024 12:26 pm
Show me where...
But you can't just assert it.
17 Dec 2024 12:29 pm
You first. All you do is assert. You have no thoughts of your own. Ever. At all. Never. Like literally never.
17 Dec 2024 12:29 pm
Do you even wonder why the obvious hostile bias, or for that matter why everyone is fleeing the overall toxic environment that New York exhibits?Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2024, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑ He's done with NY Appellate courts.
He's finding hostile reception in Federal court.
The only thing they seem to attract is illegal migrants and criminals.
17 Dec 2024 12:30 pm
Will you believe NPR or CNN?
"Trump's lawyers are likely to appeal Merchan's Monday ruling, and have also sought to dismiss the case on other grounds."~~NPR
"Trump’s lawyers are likely to appeal Merchan’s decision"~~CNN
17 Dec 2024 12:33 pm
I got this. I feel like I'm in a battle of wits with an unarmed man at this point.Vegas » 17 Dec 2024, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑ You first. All you do is assert. You have no thoughts of your own. Ever. At all. Never. Like literally never.
Tell your wife I miss her.
17 Dec 2024 12:38 pm
That's about Immunity..Cedar » 17 Dec 2024, 1:30 pm » wrote: ↑ Will you believe NPR or CNN?
"Trump's lawyers are likely to appeal Merchan's Monday ruling, and have also sought to dismiss the case on other grounds."~~NPR
"Trump’s lawyers are likely to appeal Merchan’s decision"~~CNN
Not the case already decided
17 Dec 2024 12:38 pm
Cedar » 17 Dec 2024, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑ I got this. I feel like I'm in a battle of wits with an unarmed man at this point.
Tell your wife I miss her.
I know you do. I just enjoy pissing him off. It's so easy. He has the IQ of a gnat.
17 Dec 2024 12:42 pm
:rofl:Cedar » 17 Dec 2024, 1:33 pm » wrote: ↑ I got this. I feel like I'm in a battle of wits with an unarmed man at this point.
Tell your wife I miss her.
Here's an idea..
Post your source....you've fulfilled our expectations.
17 Dec 2024 12:45 pm
What is this thread about again? You should know, you started it.Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2024, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑ That's about Immunity..
Not the case already decided
17 Dec 2024 12:45 pm
What source would you like, Sally.Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2024, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑
Here's an idea..
Post your source....you've fulfilled our expectations.
17 Dec 2024 12:49 pm
Yesterday's decision.Cedar » 17 Dec 2024, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑ What is this thread about again? You should know, you started it.
You've yet to establish a case for an appeal on Civil Rights grounds.
17 Dec 2024 12:50 pm
17 Dec 2024 1:02 pm
You're confused, Sir. What I said was Merchan may be sentenced before Trump, for violating his civil rights. That's independent of anything Trumps been convicted of. he still has appeals on the conviction.Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2024, 1:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Yesterday's decision.
You've yet to establish a case for an appeal on Civil Rights grounds.
17 Dec 2024 1:28 pm
Cedar » 17 Dec 2024, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑ You're confused, Sir. What I said was Merchan may be sentenced before Trump, for violating his civil rights. That's independent of anything Trumps been convicted of. he still has appeals on the conviction.
He's been upheld at both state and federal level...I'm reasonably certain that judges are immune from civil liability for decisions taken in the course of their duties. The best you can do is overturn them.What I said was Merchan may be sentenced before Trump, for violating his civil rights
If this idea IS your baby, it died in utero.
17 Dec 2024 1:33 pm
This **** moron thinks the judge outranks the Supreme Court.Blackvegetable » 16 Dec 2024, 6:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Judge rules Trump does not have immunity from hush money conviction
https://www.cnn.com/2024/12/16/politics ... index.html
Looks like SCOTUS is gonna have to do some more rewritin'
The judge will be lucky to keep his law license once the appeals are done with him. Who is online
In total there are 11545 users online :: 3 registered, 13 bots, and 11529 guests
Bots: Bolt, MicroMessenger, GPTBot, proximic, ADmantX, YandexBot, facebookexternalhit, Googlebot, Applebot, curl/7, Mediapartners-Google, bingbot, CriteoBot