Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2024, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 9:23 am

Cheddy.....

Stop making an *** of yourself and post your source

Once again...

"Lets make this easy for the retards in the room.

Google "Conspiracy to violate civil rights" and see what pops up.
Then it's as easy as putting U.S.C. Code into the Google.
There is my modus operandi for my "Source"

Like I said, stop being a retard.

**chuckle** "
 

Cedar » 17 Dec 2024, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 9:23 am

Oh please, mangle my argument, tell me where I'm wrong.

**chuckle**

To this point you have asserted something you've been told.

There's no associated argument.

Now let me read what your source told you.

Cedar » 17 Dec 2024, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 9:25 am

Once again...

"Lets make this easy for the retards in the room.

Google "Conspiracy to violate civil rights" and see what pops up.
Then it's as easy as putting U.S.C. Code into the Google.
There is my modus operandi for my "Source"

Like I said, stop being a retard.

**chuckle** "

Post your source, Cheddy.
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2024, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 9:25 am

To this point you have asserted something you've been told.

There's no associated argument.

Now let me read what your source told you.

OK...

Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to agree to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in the United States in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States or because of his or her having exercised such a right.Unlike most conspiracy statutes, §241 does not require, as an element, the commission of an overt act.The offense is always a felony, even if the underlying conduct would not, on its own, establish a felony violation of another criminal civil rights statute.  It is punishable by up to ten years imprisonment unless the government proves an aggravating factor (such as that the offense involved kidnapping aggravated sexual abuse, or resulted in death) in which case it may be punished by up to life imprisonment and, if death results, may be eligible for the death penalty.Section 241 is used in Law Enforcement Misconduct and Hate Crime Prosecutions. It was historically used, before conspiracy-specific trafficking statutes were adopted, in Human Trafficking prosecutions.

https://www.justice.gov/crt/statutes-en ... al-section

Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2024, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 9:26 am

Post your source, Cheddy.

**** YOU BITCH, YOU NEVER ANSWER QUESTION OR POST SOURCES

Cedar » 17 Dec 2024, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 9:24 am

Hey, whatever you're into, Pedo. I'll pray for your daughter.

Pray for your own.


 

Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2024, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 9:20 am

No, dumb **** tiny.

Cheddy is marginally better at carrying someone's water than you, but that's not worth much.

It takes me far less time to read and field dress his source than it takes him to mangle its argument.

Ya follah?

nope. All you have in your arsenal is questions and attacks on sources

Cedar » 17 Dec 2024, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 9:28 am

OK...

Section 241 makes it unlawful for two or more persons to agree to injure, threaten, or intimidate a person in the United States in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States or because of his or her having exercised such a right.Unlike most conspiracy statutes, §241 does not require, as an element, the commission of an overt act.The offense is always a felony, even if the underlying conduct would not, on its own, establish a felony violation of another criminal civil rights statute.  It is punishable by up to ten years imprisonment unless the government proves an aggravating factor (such as that the offense involved kidnapping aggravated sexual abuse, or resulted in death) in which case it may be punished by up to life imprisonment and, if death results, may be eligible for the death penalty.Section 241 is used in Law Enforcement Misconduct and Hate Crime Prosecutions. It was historically used, before conspiracy-specific trafficking statutes were adopted, in Human Trafficking prosecutions.

https://www.justice.gov/crt/statutes-en ... al-section

Cheddy,

Your cowardice is so tedious.

Your source has crafted an argument trying to tie this code to someone's behavior.

You aren't capable of prosecuting it.

Post your source.
 

BV YOU ARE THE TRUE COWARD HERE, ALWAYS RUNNING FROM ANSWERING A QUESTION OR DEFINING A TERM

Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2024, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 9:26 am

Post your source, Cheddy.

I don't know any other way to make your retarded *** understand, I've told you exactly how I found my info.

My source is Google, House.gov and Justice.gov.
 

*Huey » 17 Dec 2024, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 9:32 am

nope. All you have in your arsenal is questions and attacks on sources

That's ****, Tiny..

Just stroll the Boot Hill of your late influencers.

Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2024, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 9:37 am

That's ****, Tiny..

Just stroll the Boot Hill of your late influencers.

it is rare that you ever “Boot Hill” a topic.

Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2024, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 9:33 am

Cheddy,

Your cowardice is so tedious.

Your source has crafted an argument trying to tie this code to someone's behavior.

You aren't capable of prosecuting it.

Post your source.

Whether you believe me or not, what have I posted that is untrue?

Use your critical thinking skills if you have any, and tell me why I'm wrong.

Otherwise we're done here, **** or get off the pot.
 

Cedar » 17 Dec 2024, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 9:36 am

I don't know any other way to make your retarded *** understand, I've told you exactly how I found my info.

My source is Google, House.gov and Justice.gov.

I'll play along.

Ok..you've insisted there are "infringements of civil rights", posted code...whose civil rights were infringed by whom and how?

Simple bullet points.
 

Cedar » 17 Dec 2024, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 9:41 am

Whether you believe me or not, what have I posted that is untrue?

Use your critical thinking skills if you have any, and tell me why I'm wrong.

Otherwise we're done here, **** or get off the pot.

You've asserted unspecified "infringements"..


 

BV LOST AGAIN

*Huey » 17 Dec 2024, 9:39 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 9:39 am

it is rare that you ever “Boot Hill” a topic.

That's another lie.

You wouldn't have any way to know...

You don't "get into the weeds", 3.5
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2024, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 9:42 am

I'll play along.

Ok..you've insisted there are "infringements of civil rights", posted code...whose civil rights were infringed by whom and how?

Simple bullet points.

Donald Trumps 1st amendment rights were violated by Judge Merchan's illegal gag order, among other things.
 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Dec 2024, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 9:44 am

That's another lie.

You wouldn't have any way to know...

You don't "get into the weeds", 3.5
 

 

I am always willing to get in the weeds.  But I will sit back and watch you attempt to "Boot Hill" Cedar with facts.  

Cedar » 17 Dec 2024, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑

17 Dec 2024, 9:45 am

Donald Trumps 1st amendment rights were violated by Judge Merchan's illegal gag order, among other things.

https://www.npr.org/2024/09/12/g-s1-223 ... der-appeal


Done.


CYA!