Liberal Forum

ROG62 » 18 Dec 2024, 5:55 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2024, 5:55 pm

 
 

Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2024, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2024, 2:26 pm

But it’s true.  Your girl lost.  Running on a Biden’s policies.

Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2024, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2024, 2:26 pm

clinger, best be careful as you're beginning to stink like that **** you eat...

ROG62 » 19 Dec 2024, 5:30 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2024, 5:30 pm

clinger, best be careful as you're beginning to stink like that **** you eat...

Savoring your tears, Rog....


 

Blackvegetable » 18 Dec 2024, 2:19 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2024, 2:19 pm

https://abcnews.go.com/US/da-suggests-g ... =116912319

DA suggests Georgia election interference case against Trump may continue

The DA's office urged an appeals court to reject Trump's immunity claim

 The filing argued that Trump's lawyers failed to demonstrate why a state prosecution would be subject to the Department of Justice memorandum prohibiting the prosecution of a sitting presidents -- which was cited by special counsel Jack Smith when he wound down his federal cases against Trump -- or impede Trump's duties as president.

 "Appellant does not specify or articulate how the appeal -- or indeed, any other aspect of this case -- will constitutionally impede or interfere with his duties once he assumes office," Fulton County Chief Senior Assistant District Attorney F. McDonald Wakeford wrote.

"The notice makes mention of these concepts without actually examining them or applying them to the present circumstances. In other words, Appellant has not done the work but would very much like for this Court to do so," the filing said.

The frequency with which this **** comes back to bite Yahoos is almost perverse...

Yeah........just a little problem there........the whole legal team was thrown off the case.  It is gonna take so long to put a new team to gather either the case will go away OR it people just won't care any more.

Good luck with your talking points, Richard.

*Huey » 19 Dec 2024, 6:09 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2024, 6:09 pm

Yeah........just a little problem there........the whole legal team was thrown off the case.  It is gonna take so long to put a new team to gather either the case will go away OR it people just won't care any more.

Good luck with your talking points, Richard.

Who is telling you to believe that?

Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2024, 6:10 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2024, 6:10 pm

Who is telling you to believe that?

you need better sources, idiot.


ATLANTA — The Georgia Court of Appeals ruled on Thursday that Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and her office have been disqualified from the election interference case involving President-elect Donald Trump.


https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/ga-cou ... JQG3MUOGM/

Jeez, you are an ill informed Moron.

*Huey » 20 Dec 2024, 7:05 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 7:05 am

you need better sources, idiot.

ATLANTA — The Georgia Court of Appeals ruled on Thursday that Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis and her office have been disqualified from the election interference case involving President-elect Donald Trump.

https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/ga-cou ... JQG3MUOGM/

Jeez, you are an ill informed Moron.

It is gonna take so long to put a new team to gather either the case will go away OR it people just won't care any more.

This ****, Tatty...

Blackvegetable » 20 Dec 2024, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 7:21 am

This ****, Tatty...

prove it.
Your predictions have sucked over the years.  And you have a link,  

 

*Huey » 20 Dec 2024, 8:15 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 8:15 am

prove it.
Your predictions have sucked over the years.  And you have a link,

This is what makes you a moron.

I ask where you get it....first you play Stupid, then you insist I must prove that something you predict is ****.

Now tell me where you got it.

Your predictions have sucked over the years.  And you have a link,

You run from your words.

I don't. 
 

Blackvegetable » 20 Dec 2024, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 8:37 am

This is what makes you a moron.

I ask where you get it....first you play Stupid, then you insist I must prove that something you predict is ****.

Now tell me where you got it.

You run from your words.

I don't.

Dum Dum, they need to put together a whole new legal team.  How stupid are you, Richard?

*Huey » 20 Dec 2024, 8:42 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 8:42 am

Dum Dum, they need to put together a whole new legal team.  How stupid are you, Richard?

And?

It doesn't mean it goes away.
 

Blackvegetable » 20 Dec 2024, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 8:44 am

And?

It doesn't mean it goes away.

I suggest you go back and reread what I wrote.  Try young the quote function.

*Huey » 20 Dec 2024, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 8:53 am

I suggest you go back and reread what I wrote.  Try young the quote function.

I quoted you verbatim, twice, Idiot.

Blackvegetable » 20 Dec 2024, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 8:55 am

*Huey » 20 Dec 2024, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 8:53 am

I suggest you go back and reread what I wrote.  Try young the quote function.

I quoted you verbatim, twice, Idiot.

 

No, you haven't.  Nor have you quoted me in context.  It was an either or comment, liar.  You are busted again.  Verbatim does not necessarily equal in context or truthfully.

I am beginning to think you are actually one of those dickhead reporters, Richard.  This is how they operate. 

*Huey » 19 Dec 2024, 6:09 pm » wrote: ↑

19 Dec 2024, 6:09 pm

Blackvegetable » 18 Dec 2024, 2:19 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2024, 2:19 pm

https://abcnews.go.com/US/da-suggests-g ... =116912319

DA suggests Georgia election interference case against Trump may continue

The DA's office urged an appeals court to reject Trump's immunity claim

 The filing argued that Trump's lawyers failed to demonstrate why a state prosecution would be subject to the Department of Justice memorandum prohibiting the prosecution of a sitting presidents -- which was cited by special counsel Jack Smith when he wound down his federal cases against Trump -- or impede Trump's duties as president.

 "Appellant does not specify or articulate how the appeal -- or indeed, any other aspect of this case -- will constitutionally impede or interfere with his duties once he assumes office," Fulton County Chief Senior Assistant District Attorney F. McDonald Wakeford wrote.

"The notice makes mention of these concepts without actually examining them or applying them to the present circumstances. In other words, Appellant has not done the work but would very much like for this Court to do so," the filing said.

The frequency with which this **** comes back to bite Yahoos is almost perverse...

Yeah........just a little problem there........the whole legal team was thrown off the case.  It is gonna take so long to put a new team to gather either the case will go away OR it people just won't care any more.

Good luck with your talking points, Richard.

 

 

*Huey » 20 Dec 2024, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 8:58 am

No, you haven't.  Nor have you quoted me in context.  It was an either or comment, liar.  You are busted again.  Verbatim does not necessarily equal in context or truthfully.

I am beginning to think you are actually one of those dickhead reporters, Richard.  This is how they operate.

No, you haven't.  Nor have you quoted me in context

are these your words?

​It is gonna take so long to put a new team to gather either the case will go away OR it people just won't care any more.​​​​​​

Blackvegetable » 18 Dec 2024, 2:19 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Dec 2024, 2:19 pm

https://abcnews.go.com/US/da-suggests-g ... =116912319

DA suggests Georgia election interference case against Trump may continue

The DA's office urged an appeals court to reject Trump's immunity claim

 The filing argued that Trump's lawyers failed to demonstrate why a state prosecution would be subject to the Department of Justice memorandum prohibiting the prosecution of a sitting presidents -- which was cited by special counsel Jack Smith when he wound down his federal cases against Trump -- or impede Trump's duties as president.

 "Appellant does not specify or articulate how the appeal -- or indeed, any other aspect of this case -- will constitutionally impede or interfere with his duties once he assumes office," Fulton County Chief Senior Assistant District Attorney F. McDonald Wakeford wrote.

"The notice makes mention of these concepts without actually examining them or applying them to the present circumstances. In other words, Appellant has not done the work but would very much like for this Court to do so," the filing said.

The frequency with which this **** comes back to bite Yahoos is almost perverse...

Hummer as in bj?

BuckNaked » 20 Dec 2024, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 9:44 am

Hummer as in bj?

I guess we know why you need "woman" defined.

Blackvegetable » 20 Dec 2024, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 9:47 am

I guess we know why you need "woman" defined.

why?

Blackvegetable » 20 Dec 2024, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 9:27 am

are these your words?

Looks like them and they exactly what I said they are.  You always leave something out in your retellings.  Why is that?