Liberal Forum

*Huey » 20 Dec 2024, 3:13 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 3:13 pm

Prove you remember.  Maybe we can discuss it.  Or wait, you are not capable of topic based discussion, 5x.

:rofl:  

 

Blackvegetable » 20 Dec 2024, 3:18 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 3:18 pm

It is like when you post that comment I made about you posting a picture.  "If it is from behind, don't bother".  You claim that is not true.  

You have no recall whatsoever.

*Huey » 20 Dec 2024, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 3:20 pm

It is like when you post that comment I made about you posting a picture.  "If it is from behind, don't bother".  You claim that is not true.  

You have no recall whatsoever.

You claim that is not true.  

More fiction, Tiny.

You have no recall whatsoever

I remember the words I make you eat.

Blackvegetable » 20 Dec 2024, 3:22 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 3:22 pm

More fiction, Tiny.

I remember the words I make you eat.

Last time I told you it was about you posting a pic (a reference to your alleged Sawgrass Photo) you said I should stop the retellings.

You have no clue what the 3.5 references.

But do YOU remember what the 5x references?  I do.

*Huey » 20 Dec 2024, 3:24 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 3:24 pm

Last time I told you it was about you posting a pic (a reference to your alleged Sawgrass Photo) you said I should stop the retellings.

You have no clue what the 3.5 references.

But do YOU remember what the 5x references?  I do.

So why are you retelling it?

Geebus.

You have no clue what the 3.5 references.

No, YOU don't, Tatty.

Blackvegetable » 20 Dec 2024, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 3:27 pm

So why are you retelling it?

Geebus.

No, YOU don't, Tatty.

Mary, I already told you I don't.  You claim you do.  Enlighten me.  But you won't because you can't.

*Huey » 20 Dec 2024, 3:33 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 3:33 pm

Mary, I already told you I don't.  You claim you do.  Enlighten me.  But you won't because you can't.

Of course I can, Tiny...

But if I tell you, how will you know whether or not I'm lying?

So **** g'ddammned stupid 
 

Blackvegetable » 20 Dec 2024, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 11:17 am

If you can't tell me why rape is in quotation marks, you must stop presuming to explain Kaplan's filing.

Tell me why he wrote 59 pages rather than 61 pages.

ConsRule » 20 Dec 2024, 3:39 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 3:39 pm

Tell me why he wrote 59 pages rather than 61 pages.

My question is relevant.

Blackvegetable » 20 Dec 2024, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 3:36 pm

Of course I can, Tiny...

But if I tell you, how will you know whether or not I'm lying?

So **** g'ddammned stupid

Didn't think you were man enough.  You really are a coward.  All I recall is there was some dishonesty pertaining your side of whatever that issue is.  

But tell me, are you ready to Biden lied twice, when he mentioned 5x?  It was like you were sucking his dick you were protecting him so hard.

Speaking of bias....

Blackvegetable » 20 Dec 2024, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 3:43 pm

My question is relevant.

Relevant to you...mine is relevant to me.

 
Besides...his filing was not a ruling on the accusations made in the case.  The jury had already done that.  His filing was a ruling on the Trump appeal of the size of the judgement.  Thus, the entire filing is not relevant to the assertion that no JURY, anywhere on earth, has ever found Trump committed rape.

*Huey » 20 Dec 2024, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 3:44 pm

Didn't think you were man enough.  You really are a coward.  All I recall is there was some dishonesty pertaining your side of whatever that issue is.  

But tell me, are you ready to Biden lied twice, when he mentioned 5x?  It was like you were sucking his dick you were protecting him so hard.

Speaking of bias....

Why do you insist on turning the chain gun on your face?

But tell me, are you ready to Biden lied twice, when he mentioned 5x?  It was like you were sucking his dick you were protecting him so hard.

If that is "sucking dick", what's "2ndBesty"?

Blackvegetable » 20 Dec 2024, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 2:17 pm

Nothing I say is worth reading.

You're right, I am an imbecile.

Is this an ADMISSION?? Why of course it is!!

 

Blackvegetable » 20 Dec 2024, 3:49 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Dec 2024, 3:49 pm

Why do you insist on turning the chain gun on your face?

If that is "sucking dick", what's "2ndBesty"?

The question was who did I think was the best president of MY LIFETIME.  I said Reagan with Trump 2nd.  Just to keep you honest about the retelling.

3.5 did not have anything to do with the 30 mike mike discussion.  By the way, tell us your personal experience with a 30 MM.
 

He was convicted of sexual misconduct in a civil case.
Close enough.

 

Squatchman » 21 Dec 2024, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2024, 8:22 am

He was convicted of sexual misconduct in a civil case.
Close enough.

But he wasn't convicted of rape.

FJB » 21 Dec 2024, 8:27 am » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2024, 8:27 am

But he wasn't convicted of rape.

  Sexual misconduct in a civil court.
Close enough for everyone but the cult.


 

Squatchman » 21 Dec 2024, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2024, 8:32 am

  Sexual misconduct in a civil court.
Close enough for everyone but the cult.

NOT RAPE.... you assholes can reach all you want.... facts are facts

What does 3.5 refer to?

Squatchman » 21 Dec 2024, 8:32 am » wrote: ↑

21 Dec 2024, 8:32 am

  Sexual misconduct in a civil court.
Close enough for everyone but the cult.

The ONLY cult we see is that one YOU belong to. That TDS cult of MORONS and IDIOTS!!

Enjoy your day, micro-cock. I guess you call that a "foot long-er" too, huh?? Or is it just "close enough"???