Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Hey BV, ask Stephypoopolous WHAT HAPPENS when you CLAIM TRUMP'S a RAPIST!!
Hey BV, ask Stephypoopolous WHAT HAPPENS when you CLAIM TRUMP'S a RAPIST!!
By *Beekeeper
19 Dec 2024 5:04 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
19 Dec 2024 6:03 pm
ConsRule » 19 Dec 2024, 6:24 pm » wrote: ↑ I agree. The judge lied about the jury finding. He would probably spin it by pointing out he used the common parlance definition. Unfortunately, juries (and courts) are bound to based their decisions on what the law actually states.
The judge lied about the jury finding.
like talking to very stupid moss.Ask Kaplan...he wrote it.
19 Dec 2024 7:11 pm
What you apparently are too stupid to understand, in that filing by Kaplan he was NOT making a ruling on the issues of fact (the allegations) in the case of Carroll v Trump. He was ruling on the appeal by Trump on the size of the award. He offered his OPINION on the issue of rape and acknowledged it was based on common parlance definition and NOT BASED on NY Law. The findings on the allegations in the case had already been made by the jury. The mystery (in my opinion) is why he even addressed rape since not one single dollar of the award was related to rape. Primarily because a jury cannot award damages when they rule something was not proven.
19 Dec 2024 7:16 pm
Why do you presume to explain to me, lying bumpkin?ConsRule » 19 Dec 2024, 8:11 pm » wrote: ↑ What you apparently are too stupid to understand, in that filing by Kaplan he was NOT making a ruling on the issues of fact (the allegations) in the case of Carroll v Trump. He was ruling on the appeal by Trump on the size of the award. He offered his OPINION on the issue of rape and acknowledged it was based on common parlance definition and NOT BASED on NY Law. The findings on the allegations in the case had already been made by the jury. The mystery (in my opinion) is why he even addressed rape since not one single dollar of the award was related to rape. Primarily because a jury cannot award damages when they rule something was not proven.
19 Dec 2024 7:19 pm
Apparently, brown....you just don't grasp as to what degree of stupid you are...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
19 Dec 2024 7:24 pm
brown, why do you presume anyone here enjoys your perpetual display of too much stupid?Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2024, 8:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Why do you presume to explain to me, lying bumpkin?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
19 Dec 2024 9:06 pm
Show me ONE false statement in that post...link to proof required.Blackvegetable » 19 Dec 2024, 8:16 pm » wrote: ↑ Why do you presume to explain to me, lying bumpkin?
20 Dec 2024 4:51 am
ConsRule » 19 Dec 2024, 10:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Show me ONE false statement in that post...link to proof required.
Connie,
You have lied about the Judge. You invented a context for his comments in which you persist. Your assertions are supported by nothing but your reflexive anti-semitism and passion for Yam Jesus.
That the jury found Grifty liable for digitally penetrating the plaintiff is a FACT. That both the DoJ and DoD consider such an act of rape is a FACT. That you've lied about the Judge's motivation and reasoning is a FACT.
So why the **** are you whining.....other than because it is what MAGAts do?
20 Dec 2024 5:33 am
It'll cost you, SLAVE TRADER U!!Blackvegetable » 20 Dec 2024, 5:51 am » wrote: ↑ Connie,
You have lied about the Judge. You invented a context for his comments in which you persist. Your assertions are supported by nothing but your reflexive anti-semitism and passion for Yam Jesus.
That the jury found Grifty liable for digitally penetrating the plaintiff is a FACT. That both the DoJ and DoD consider such an act of rape is a FACT. That you've lied about the Judge's motivation and reasoning is a FACT.
So why the **** are you whining.....other than because it is what MAGAts do?
MAYBE your "special Series 24 powers" will fail you again!!
https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/car ... -800x0.jpg
Ask Stephypoopolous what calling Trump a RAPIST costs you!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
20 Dec 2024 5:34 am
Blackvegetable » 20 Dec 2024, 5:51 am » wrote: ↑ Connie,
You have lied about the Judge. You invented a context for his comments in which you persist. Your assertions are supported by nothing but your reflexive anti-semitism and passion for Yam Jesus.
That the jury found Grifty liable for digitally penetrating the plaintiff is a FACT. That both the DoJ and DoD consider such an act of rape is a FACT. That you've lied about the Judge's motivation and reasoning is a FACT.
So why the **** are you whining.....other than because it is what MAGAts do?
Here's the BOTTOM LINE, ASSWIPER....
https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
20 Dec 2024 5:47 am
I agree that the jury found Trump liable for digitally penetrating the plaintiff. What you do not have the intelligence and emotional strength to understand is that, at the time of the incident, that was the definition of sexual assault and NOT rape under NY law. That is why, if you had the courage to actually look at the jury verdict form, you would see the ruled "yes" on that charge and made an award. How the DOJ and DOD define rape is not relevant in the Carroll v Trump case as the case was a civil matter being tried under NY law.Blackvegetable » 20 Dec 2024, 5:51 am » wrote: ↑ Connie,
You have lied about the Judge. You invented a context for his comments in which you persist. Your assertions are supported by nothing but your reflexive anti-semitism and passion for Yam Jesus.
That the jury found Grifty liable for digitally penetrating the plaintiff is a FACT. That both the DoJ and DoD consider such an act of rape is a FACT. That you've lied about the Judge's motivation and reasoning is a FACT.
So why the **** are you whining.....other than because it is what MAGAts do?
Also, I have only given my opinion on the motivation of Kaplan. If you bothered to check that OED you boasted about having you would know an opinion, by definition, cannot be a lie.
Besides, you have not offered proof that anything I stated in that post was incorrect. Since you appear to have nothing, I accept your concession.
20 Dec 2024 5:55 am
ConsRule » 20 Dec 2024, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑ I agree that the jury found Trump liable for digitally penetrating the plaintiff. What you do not have the intelligence and emotional strength to understand is that, at the time of the incident, that was the definition of sexual assault and NOT rape under NY law. That is why, if you had the courage to actually look at the jury verdict form, you would see the ruled "yes" on that charge and made an award. How the DOJ and DOD define rape is not relevant in the Carroll v Trump case as the case was a civil matter being tried under NY law.
Also, I have only given my opinion on the motivation of Kaplan. If you bothered to check that OED you boasted about having you would know an opinion, by definition, cannot be a lie.
Besides, you have not offered proof that anything I stated in that post was incorrect. Since you appear to have nothing, I accept your concession.
Stop presuming to explain things to me, Connie.What you do not have the intelligence and emotional strength to understand is that, at the time of the incident,
You don't have the onions for that job.
Stop with your presumption.How the DOJ and DOD define rape is not relevant in the Carroll v Trump case as the case was a civil matter being tried under NY law.
If you are so **** smart, explain why Kaplan places rape in quotation marks.
No ****, just reasoning.
20 Dec 2024 5:58 am
His **** opinion... nothing more, nothing less. HOLDS NO WATERBlackvegetable » 20 Dec 2024, 6:55 am » wrote: ↑ Stop presuming to explain things to me, Connie.
You don't have the onions for that job.
Stop with your presumption.
If you are so **** smart, explain why Kaplan places rape in quotation marks.
No ****, just reasoning.
20 Dec 2024 6:06 am
Blackvegetable » 20 Dec 2024, 6:55 am » wrote: ↑ Stop presuming to explain things to me, Connie.
You don't have the onions for that job.
Stop with your presumption.
If you are so **** smart, explain why Kaplan places rape in quotation marks.
No ****, just reasoning.
The JURY put NOTHING in quotes.
TRUMP WAS NOT FOUND TO HAVE RAPED CARROLL!!
https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png
So UNLESS it was a BENCH TRIAL, which it WAS NOT, Kaplan's OPINION is about a valid as dog **** on your lips would be!!! A JUDGE does NOT have "the final say", but did give his OPINION and one based on ZERO JURY FINDINGS FACTS!!
See above for FACTS, DICKYSUCKYBOY!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
20 Dec 2024 6:14 am
ConsRule » 20 Dec 2024, 6:47 am » wrote: ↑ I agree that the jury found Trump liable for digitally penetrating the plaintiff. What you do not have the intelligence and emotional strength to understand is that, at the time of the incident, that was the definition of sexual assault and NOT rape under NY law. That is why, if you had the courage to actually look at the jury verdict form, you would see the ruled "yes" on that charge and made an award. How the DOJ and DOD define rape is not relevant in the Carroll v Trump case as the case was a civil matter being tried under NY law.
Also, I have only given my opinion on the motivation of Kaplan. If you bothered to check that OED you boasted about having you would know an opinion, by definition, cannot be a lie.
Besides, you have not offered proof that anything I stated in that post was incorrect. Since you appear to have nothing, I accept your concession.
So Megachurch Christian...Also, I have only given my opinion on the motivation of Kaplan. If you bothered to check that OED you boasted about having you would know an opinion, by definition, cannot be a lie
However, he chose to ignore (lie) about their verdict on question 1 (where they followed NY law) and redefine the parameters outside of NY law rather than focus on the things actually related to their award.
You see, the jury was using NY Penal Law (as they were required to do), but Kaplan decided to use a dictionary and other codes until he found a reason to call it rape. The odd part is, the appeal was about the judgement and, because they found Trump did not commit rape, none of the award was related to rape.
And the filing is completely irrelevant.
By the way, none of the jury award was related to rape. Which makes me wonder why Kaplan felt the need to lie about that portion of the case.
I could go on...The opinion has no legal authority.
20 Dec 2024 6:55 am
You could, but your CURB STOMPINGS would continue and only get WORSE!!
Try SHUTTING THE **** UP for a change and take your *** KICKING like a MAN instead of the ****** YOU ARE!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
20 Dec 2024 6:57 am
:rofl:*Beekeeper » 20 Dec 2024, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑ You could, but your CURB STOMPINGS would continue and only get WORSE!!
Try SHUTTING THE **** UP for a change and take your *** KICKING like a MAN instead of the ****** YOU ARE!!
20 Dec 2024 6:58 am
So Megachurch Christian...
However, he chose to ignore (lie) about their verdict on question 1 (where they followed NY law) and redefine the parameters outside of NY law rather than focus on the things actually related to their award.
You see, the jury was using NY Penal Law (as they were required to do), but Kaplan decided to use a dictionary and other codes until he found a reason to call it rape. The odd part is, the appeal was about the judgement and, because they found Trump did not commit rape, none of the award was related to rape.
And the filing is completely irrelevant.
By the way, none of the jury award was related to rape. Which makes me wonder why Kaplan felt the need to lie about that portion of the case.
I could go on...The opinion has no legal authority.
____________________________________
So tell us, with link(s) to proof, which of the above is incorrect.
20 Dec 2024 6:58 am
https://i.postimg.cc/Pf04sdrF/****.jpg
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
20 Dec 2024 7:04 am
Connie,ConsRule » 20 Dec 2024, 7:58 am » wrote: ↑ So Megachurch Christian...
I could go on...
____________________________________
So tell us, with link(s) to proof, which of the above is incorrect.
We've gone through that exercise...
It is time for you to explain why you are entitled to lie.
20 Dec 2024 7:07 am
So, you have nothing.Blackvegetable » 20 Dec 2024, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑ Connie,
We've gone through that exercise...
It is time for you to explain why you are entitled to lie.
I accept your surrender.
Who is online
In total there are 5151 users online :: 12 registered, 14 bots, and 5125 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Squatchman, ROG62, RebelGator, Beekeeper, nefarious101, sole, Fuelman, PoliticalPopUp
Bots: Bolt, okhttp, ADmantX, MicroMessenger, proximic, YandexBot, Applebot, CriteoBot, facebookexternalhit, Googlebot, bingbot, curl/7, Mediapartners-Google, Baiduspider