Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Liz Cheney Says Oversight Committee Is Lying, Loudermilk Drops The Transcripts [WATCH
Liz Cheney Says Oversight Committee Is Lying, Loudermilk Drops The Transcripts [WATCH
By Majik
21 Dec 2024 8:41 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
23 Dec 2024 2:51 pm
the law
------------------------------------
A "conflict of interest" for a lawyer occurs when their personal interests or their representation of another client could potentially interfere with their ability to fully and ethically represent the current client's best interests, often requiring them to disclose the conflict and seek informed consent from the client before proceeding with representation
23 Dec 2024 3:31 pm
No, The lawyer hasn't been reprimanded ...jerrab » 23 Dec 2024, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑ the law
------------------------------------
A "conflict of interest" for a lawyer occurs when their personal interests or their representation of another client could potentially interfere with their ability to fully and ethically represent the current client's best interests, often requiring them to disclose the conflict and seek informed consent from the client before proceeding with representation
so, who put the false notion in her head that her lawyer was being unethical?
Was it Cheney ?
Or the lawyer Cheney Introduced her to?
WHO made that determination ?
Because she didn't....
23 Dec 2024 3:39 pm
Cassidy Hutchinson CAUGHT in Handwriting LIEjerrab » 23 Dec 2024, 3:51 pm » wrote: ↑ the law
------------------------------------
A "conflict of interest" for a lawyer occurs when their personal interests or their representation of another client could potentially interfere with their ability to fully and ethically represent the current client's best interests, often requiring them to disclose the conflict and seek informed consent from the client before proceeding with representation
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source= ... eyhi02JCSx
she is a proven liar....
23 Dec 2024 3:40 pm
it is a fact of law. a lawyer should have not s conflict of interest regarding his client and yet he was retained by a TRUMP PAC.Majik » 23 Dec 2024, 4:31 pm » wrote: ↑ No, The lawyer hasn't been reprimanded ...
so, who put the false notion in her head that her lawyer was being unethical?
Was it Cheney ?
Or the lawyer Cheney Introduced her to?
WHO made that determination ?
Because she didn't....
23 Dec 2024 3:48 pm
-----------------------------------------------Majik » 23 Dec 2024, 4:31 pm » wrote: ↑ No, The lawyer hasn't been reprimanded ...
so, who put the false notion in her head that her lawyer was being unethical?
Was it Cheney ?
Or the lawyer Cheney Introduced her to?
WHO made that determination ?
Because she didn't....
Here are three key takeaways from the Passantino matter:
First, witness intimidation has become increasingly normalized -- and needs to be stopped. Trump and others in his orbit regularly threaten witnesses, prosecutors, lawyers, and others associated with the myriad investigations into the former President. We don't know why Hutchinson decided not to cooperate in these investigations, but we do know that the normalization and acceptance of this kind of conduct is a serious threat to the proper functioning of our system of justice. Laws against this kind of intimidation must be enforced.
23 Dec 2024 4:32 pm
Majik » 23 Dec 2024, 4:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Cassidy Hutchinson CAUGHT in Handwriting LIE
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source= ... eyhi02JCSx
she is a proven liar....
did she lie about the name of her lawyer?
23 Dec 2024 4:33 pm
23 Dec 2024 6:03 pm
cassidy reached out to her. it was cheney's function to gather evidence and testimony. passantino was blocking her testimony- very very unethical.Majik » 23 Dec 2024, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ The other issue I have with your accusation above is how does anybody know what was stated between her and her lawyer because of client attorney privilege .....
And Cheney talking to her privately while being a commitee member during an investigation is indeed criminal.....
do you disagree?
And why?
-----------------------------------------------------That testimony, though, came about only after Hutchinson went through an internal struggle described in her 2023 book “Enough.” Hutchinson was a loyal Trump supporter and, as such, was provided by Trump’s team with an attorney, Stefan Passantino, when the select committee first subpoenaed her in January 2022.She sat for two depositions with committee staffers in February and March of that year. Following Passantino’s advice, she didn’t volunteer information that would cast Trump in a negative light. But she began to have qualms about this approach, later reaching out to her former colleague Alyssa Farah for advice on how to proceed. Farah helped orchestrate a third deposition, in May 2022, during which Hutchinson was able to speak more freely. Her attorney was not pleased, and neither was Trumpworld.In early June, Passantino recommended that Hutchinson stop complying with the committee’s efforts, including an anticipated fourth interview. In her book, she writes that she expected but “dreaded” Passantino forcing the issue, worried that she would be putting herself at risk of contempt charges. So, soon after, she contacted Cheney directly. Two months ago, Loudermilk’s subcommittee released some information about this communication, framing it in ethical, not legal, terms.
23 Dec 2024 6:07 pm
that was directed at you bitch...
23 Dec 2024 6:41 pm
Now, why are you so concerned with this .....?jerrab » 23 Dec 2024, 7:03 pm » wrote: ↑ cassidy reached out to her. it was cheney's function to gather evidence and testimony. passantino was blocking her testimony- very very unethical.
-----------------------------------------------------That testimony, though, came about only after Hutchinson went through an internal struggle described in her 2023 book “Enough.” Hutchinson was a loyal Trump supporter and, as such, was provided by Trump’s team with an attorney, Stefan Passantino, when the select committee first subpoenaed her in January 2022.She sat for two depositions with committee staffers in February and March of that year. Following Passantino’s advice, she didn’t volunteer information that would cast Trump in a negative light. But she began to have qualms about this approach, later reaching out to her former colleague Alyssa Farah for advice on how to proceed. Farah helped orchestrate a third deposition, in May 2022, during which Hutchinson was able to speak more freely. Her attorney was not pleased, and neither was Trumpworld.In early June, Passantino recommended that Hutchinson stop complying with the committee’s efforts, including an anticipated fourth interview. In her book, she writes that she expected but “dreaded” Passantino forcing the issue, worried that she would be putting herself at risk of contempt charges. So, soon after, she contacted Cheney directly. Two months ago, Loudermilk’s subcommittee released some information about this communication, framing it in ethical, not legal, terms.
Because it doesn't mean jack **** now .....
and never will ....Now.
So why are you so hung up with the soap opera ?
You should be more worried about the Kurds.
23 Dec 2024 6:51 pm
Majik » 23 Dec 2024, 7:41 pm » wrote: ↑ Now, why are you so concerned with this .....?
Because it doesn't mean jack **** now .....
and never will ....Now.
So why are you so hung up with the soap opera ?
You should be more worried about the Kurds.
you sound scared. yep this just might backfire.
23 Dec 2024 6:54 pm
WHEN will you post the TESTIMONY you claim you want to make a point about DICKHEAD??
OTHERWISE, you're a **** IDIOT that no one knows what you are talking about. After all, she had HOURS of testimony according to the Committee's report.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
23 Dec 2024 7:05 pm
Why? It'll just make you look stupid...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
23 Dec 2024 7:15 pm
so he can't. gotcha
23 Dec 2024 9:37 pm
-------------------------------Majik » 23 Dec 2024, 4:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Cassidy Hutchinson CAUGHT in Handwriting LIE
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source= ... eyhi02JCSx
she is a proven liar....
Yes, a lawyer can be disbarred for a conflict of interest, especially if the conflict is severe enough and the lawyer knowingly represents a client while having a conflicting interest, potentially jeopardizing the client's representation and breaching ethical duties; this could lead to disciplinary actions including suspension or disbarment from practicing law
23 Dec 2024 9:38 pm
Scared?
hardly....
You need ro get help for your many mental impediments...
Just Saying......
23 Dec 2024 9:39 pm
Thank you cliff craven....jerrab » 23 Dec 2024, 10:37 pm » wrote: ↑ -------------------------------
Yes, a lawyer can be disbarred for a conflict of interest, especially if the conflict is severe enough and the lawyer knowingly represents a client while having a conflicting interest, potentially jeopardizing the client's representation and breaching ethical duties; this could lead to disciplinary actions including suspension or disbarment from practicing law
you now have relevance....
What's next...
23 Dec 2024 11:21 pm
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
23 Dec 2024 11:21 pm
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
23 Dec 2024 11:22 pm
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Who is online
In total there are 9534 users online :: 6 registered, 12 bots, and 9516 guests
Bots: DuckDuckBot, proximic, curl/7, Bolt, facebookexternalhit, YandexBot, Applebot, Googlebot, ADmantX, Mediapartners-Google, bingbot, CriteoBot