Tiny,*Huey » 22 Dec 2024, 12:28 pm » wrote: ↑ No, it is not about us. Although you always try to do that. It is about the OP.
Waiting on you….Blackvegetable » 22 Dec 2024, 12:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
You yapped.
Now you've joined Coozie on the run.
No, you aren't.
QED.
Blackvegetable » 22 Dec 2024, 12:52 pm » wrote: ↑ QED.
You have no idea....and no right to comment - under your own rule.
Rog,ROG62 » 22 Dec 2024, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑ You're supposed to have the best vocabulary money can buy. Use it, lazy asswipe.
You can stop yapping...
I said I saw her testimony, Tatty.
Tiny,*Huey » 22 Dec 2024, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Wonderful. Since you have no point or stand on what is wrong with the OP there is no need to continue, Troll.
Blackvegetable » 22 Dec 2024, 1:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
You don't know because you didn't watch the testimony.
I know because I did.
*Huey » 22 Dec 2024, 1:12 pm » wrote: ↑ I'm happy for you. No move along. You saw what they wanted you to see.
I am very curious about the witness transcripts that were not made public. Aren't you?
You would have no idea...you didn't see it.You saw what they wanted you to see.
Please don't be so vague...I am very curious about the witness transcripts that were not made public. Aren't you?
Blackvegetable » 22 Dec 2024, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑ You would have no idea...you didn't see it.
Please don't be so vague...
Blackvegetable » 22 Dec 2024, 1:14 pm » wrote: ↑ You would have no idea...you didn't see it.
Please don't be so vague...
That's vague.*Huey » 22 Dec 2024, 1:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Try reading the article in the OP. I'll wait. You are in this thread spewing BS and you have no clue what is I the article. Par for the course
But you aren't...you're vague.*Huey » 22 Dec 2024, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Not vague at all. The article is very specific. Get back to me when you are more informed on the OP.