Liberal Forum

  Yes. 
Hunter Biden was.

Squatchman » 26 Dec 2024, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

26 Dec 2024, 9:22 am

  Yes. 
Hunter Biden was.

If he did so, sure.  

Squatchman » 26 Dec 2024, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

26 Dec 2024, 9:22 am

  Yes. 
Hunter Biden was.

You're a **** IDIOT of the best kind!!



 A federal appeals court on Wednesday ruled that a decades-old law prohibiting users of illegal drugs from owning firearms was unconstitutional as applied to the case of a marijuana user, the latest fallout from a U.S. Supreme Court ruling last year that expanded gun rights.

A three-judge panel of the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the federal law violated a Mississippi man's right to "keep and bear arms" under the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment.

The man, Patrick Daniels, had been convicted under that law after law enforcement found a pistol and a semi-automatic rifle in his vehicle during a traffic stop along with marijuana cigarette butts.

The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration did not administer a drug test, though Daniels admitted he sometimes smoked marijuana, which federal law prohibits. He was sentenced to nearly four years in prison.

Drug user cannot be barred from owning guns, US court rules | Reuters


Enjoy your *** KICKING, DICKBREATH!!
         
 

Squatchman » 26 Dec 2024, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

26 Dec 2024, 9:22 am

  Yes. 
Hunter Biden was.

You know, *******, you should PROBABLY spend 20 seconds researching your DUMBASSERY before you post **** that can EASILY be proven as a LIE!!

But then again, you are a **** DEMOCRAT IDIOT that believes any and all **** your handlers shove up that NASTY *** of yours.

 

*Beekeeper » 26 Dec 2024, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

26 Dec 2024, 9:36 am

You know, *******, you should PROBABLY spend 20 seconds researching your DUMBASSERY before you post **** that can EASILY be proven as a LIE!!

But then again, you are a **** DEMOCRAT IDIOT that believes any and all **** your handlers shove up that NASTY *** of yours.

WILMINGTON, Del. (AP) — Hunter Biden was convicted Tuesday of all three felony charges related to the purchase of a revolver in 2018 when, prosecutors argued, the president’s son lied on a mandatory gun-purchase form by saying he was not illegally using or addicted to drugs.


what point were you trying to make?

Blackvegetable » 26 Dec 2024, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑

26 Dec 2024, 9:47 am

WILMINGTON, Del. (AP) — Hunter Biden was convicted Tuesday of all three felony charges related to the purchase of a revolver in 2018 when, prosecutors argued, the president’s son lied on a mandatory gun-purchase form by saying he was not illegally using or addicted to drugs.

what point were you trying to make?

Ever heard of Ex Post Facto??

Nice try, but a complete fail. Again.

 

*Beekeeper » 26 Dec 2024, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

26 Dec 2024, 9:51 am

Ever heard of Ex Post Facto??

Nice try, but a complete fail. Again.

Imbecile,

Bruen was a piece of **** which is causing problems everywhere. Courts, even the notorious 5th Circuit,  are writing decisions consistent with Bruen that wind up back in front of SCOTUS.

Ammosexuals can't figure out where they are at....they want Hunter, but they want their Bruen too.

Assuming you wanted Hunter "on principle", you should be accepting of the same sanctions applying to the Grifty's fellow sex offender
 
 

*Beekeeper » 26 Dec 2024, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑

26 Dec 2024, 9:34 am

You're a **** IDIOT of the best kind!!



 A federal appeals court on Wednesday ruled that a decades-old law prohibiting users of illegal drugs from owning firearms was unconstitutional as applied to the case of a marijuana user, the latest fallout from a U.S. Supreme Court ruling last year that expanded gun rights.

A three-judge panel of the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the federal law violated a Mississippi man's right to "keep and bear arms" under the U.S. Constitution's Second Amendment.

The man, Patrick Daniels, had been convicted under that law after law enforcement found a pistol and a semi-automatic rifle in his vehicle during a traffic stop along with marijuana cigarette butts.

The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration did not administer a drug test, though Daniels admitted he sometimes smoked marijuana, which federal law prohibits. He was sentenced to nearly four years in prison.

Drug user cannot be barred from owning guns, US court rules | Reuters


Enjoy your *** KICKING, DICKBREATH!!
         
 

 

The question is still on ATF 4473.  Just filled one out last week.  

Squatchman » 26 Dec 2024, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

26 Dec 2024, 9:22 am

  Yes. 
Hunter Biden was.

Sure...
If he committed a crime...

Yes
 

Blackvegetable » 26 Dec 2024, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

26 Dec 2024, 9:57 am

Imbecile,

Bruen was a piece of **** which is causing problems everywhere. Courts, even the notorious 5th Circuit,  are writing decisions consistent with Bruen that wind up back in front of SCOTUS.

Ammosexuals can't figure out where they are at....they want Hunter, but they want their Bruen too.

Assuming you wanted Hunter "on principle", you should be accepting of the same sanctions applying to the Grifty's fellow sex offender

And there you go again!! ALLEGATIONS without a shred of evidence presented in ANY court of law!!! You and your ILK are just ITCHING for another of those DEFAMATION LAWSUITS aren't you!!

FACT- Hunty was at the time of his PURCHASE a PROVEN DRUG ADDICT and actively USING. A LOT OF DOPE. He LIED on the form.

There is ZERO EVIDENCE GIVEN that Gaetz purchased ANY firearms that you can show at ANYTIME that he may have used something recreationally. So either BRING YOUR EVIDENCE or SHUT THE **** UP!!

And if Hunty thinks his "conviction" was WRONGLY REACHED, then he can APPEAL IT as this case I cited was appealed.

OH WAIT!! Daddy made SURE that Hunty got of SCOT FREE with that 10-year retroactive PARDON he got for ALL CRIMES THE BIDEN CRIME INC OPERATIVE COMMITTED!!

Blackvegetable » 26 Dec 2024, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

26 Dec 2024, 9:57 am

Imbecile,

Bruen was a piece of **** which is causing problems everywhere. Courts, even the notorious 5th Circuit,  are writing decisions consistent with Bruen that wind up back in front of SCOTUS.

Ammosexuals can't figure out where they are at....they want Hunter, but they want their Bruen too.

Assuming you wanted Hunter "on principle", you should be accepting of the same sanctions applying to the Grifty's fellow sex offender

Oh, are they winding back up in front of the SCOTUS on appeals by your GUN GRABBING DOJ, right, ****??

You really need to shut the **** up and get some FACTS before you open that PIE HOLE of yours that CONSTANTLY LIES!! So which CASES are "winding back up in front of the SCOTUS" that you can cite. Try finding us a few BEFORE you make claims your *** CAN'T PROVIDE PROOF OF!!

Next *** KICKING administered!! GRANDLY AND WITH GUSTO AT THAT!!

 

Blackvegetable » 26 Dec 2024, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑

26 Dec 2024, 9:47 am

WILMINGTON, Del. (AP) — Hunter Biden was convicted Tuesday of all three felony charges related to the purchase of a revolver in 2018 when, prosecutors argued, the president’s son lied on a mandatory gun-purchase form by saying he was not illegally using or addicted to drugs.

what point were you trying to make?

So he lied on the paperwork...which is a felony.

Maybe read your cut and paste before clicking submit.

 

Squatchman » 26 Dec 2024, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

26 Dec 2024, 9:22 am

  Yes. 
Hunter Biden was.

Hey "Bigfoot in a dress"...


Didn't you get the memo....progressive opinions don't matter anymore....Americans don't trust you all.....at all!

Squatchman » 26 Dec 2024, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

26 Dec 2024, 9:22 am

  Yes. 
Hunter Biden was.

sure. Then Trump can pardon him!

Squatchman » 26 Dec 2024, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

26 Dec 2024, 9:22 am

  Yes. 
Hunter Biden was.

You people do it every day....in droves.

 
 

Blackvegetable » 26 Dec 2024, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

26 Dec 2024, 9:57 am

Imbecile,

Bruen was a piece of **** which is causing problems everywhere. Courts, even the notorious 5th Circuit,  are writing decisions consistent with Bruen that wind up back in front of SCOTUS.

Ammosexuals can't figure out where they are at....they want Hunter, but they want their Bruen too.

Assuming you wanted Hunter "on principle", you should be accepting of the same sanctions applying to the Grifty's fellow sex offender

The Bruen decision by Thomas was not the wrong decision.  Having to prove a need to carry was burdensome in NYC.  And the rest of law is still in place.  How Thomas said he arrived at the decision, looking at the history of laws.  

Blackvegetable » 26 Dec 2024, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

26 Dec 2024, 9:57 am

Imbecile,

Bruen was a piece of **** which is causing problems everywhere. Courts, even the notorious 5th Circuit,  are writing decisions consistent with Bruen that wind up back in front of SCOTUS.

Ammosexuals can't figure out where they are at....they want Hunter, but they want their Bruen too.

Assuming you wanted Hunter "on principle", you should be accepting of the same sanctions applying to the Grifty's fellow sex offender

We're STILL WAITING on all those CASES winding back at the SCOTUS there ASSWIPER!!

Can't produce any?? Awww, imagine that.

Squatchman » 26 Dec 2024, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

26 Dec 2024, 9:22 am

  Yes. 
Hunter Biden was.

No.  Hunter Biden went free. This is no longer a crime in America.
 

Squatchman » 26 Dec 2024, 9:22 am » wrote: ↑

26 Dec 2024, 9:22 am

  Yes. 
Hunter Biden was.

if he did something criminally...
 

*Beekeeper » 26 Dec 2024, 9:36 am » wrote: ↑

26 Dec 2024, 9:36 am

You know, *******, you should PROBABLY spend 20 seconds researching your DUMBASSERY before you post **** that can EASILY be proven as a LIE!!

But then again, you are a **** DEMOCRAT IDIOT that believes any and all **** your handlers shove up that NASTY *** of yours.