You don't know what our treaty with Panama says, do you?Sumela » 30 Dec 2024, 10:25 pm » wrote: ↑ China LEGALLY in Panama
has triggered FAT EMPIRE TRUMPY.
GLORIOUS!
I know that Panama is a sovereign country.
Yeah, the Russians.*Beekeeper » 28 Dec 2024, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑ Wait!! Can Denmark stop us from OCCUPYING IT if we desire??
Uh, they DEPEND ON THE US of A to keep the RUSSIANS out of their nation, so you need to CLOSE THAT RUNNY **** MOUTH HOLE OF YOURS!!
Why do you call him Fraudy, Vern?ROG62 » 28 Dec 2024, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑ fraudy, I recall after the election you were "giving Trump a chance"...
did you forget?
were you full of ****?
did something happen that changed your mind?
Real quick, explain what "acting like asshole dictators" means.PhiloBeddo » 28 Dec 2024, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑ We gave it to them in good faith. If they want to act like asshole dictators and abuse their power, take it back.
You'd respond if YOU weren't a runner.
This dick sucker ^ is going to be pro-Putin and anti-Ukraine the minute Trump tells him to be.nefarious101 » 29 Dec 2024, 6:27 am » wrote: ↑ Hey Dickhead who calls himself "Sumela a ***'s ***"....
Panama will do what Trump tells them to do...just like Pootin' will.
RT is the link.....it's the CNNLOL SAYS of Russia
caught you spreading Pootin' propaganda again
he's not, frank...Cannonpointer » 30 Dec 2024, 10:48 pm » wrote: ↑ Why do you call him Fraudy, Vern?
He's real **** straight with HIS ****. Unlike some.
Know what I mean?
Get ready to move over little dog - a big dog's moving in.*Beekeeper » 29 Dec 2024, 9:12 pm » wrote: ↑ You MIGHT want to EDUCATE yourself so you don't look so **** STUPID CONSTANTLY!!!
What is China’s influence in the Panama Canal?A2: Chinese companies have been heavily involved in infrastructure-related contracts in and around the Canal in Panama’s logistics, electricity, and construction sectors. These projects fit naturally with China’s BRI vision, onto which Panama was the first Latin American country to sign in 2018. This, along with Panama’s recognition of China, boosted China’s already existent footprint in the Canal, and Chinese companies have since positioned themselves at either end of the Panama Canal through port concession agreements. In 2016, in a $900 million deal, the China-based Landbridge Group acquired control of Margarita Island, Panama’s largest port on the Atlantic side and in the Colón Free Trade Zone, the largest free trade zone in the Western Hemisphere. The deal established the Panama-Colón Container Port (PCCP) as a deep-water port for megaships, and the construction and expansion was carried out by the China Communications Construction Company (CCCC), a company also active in China’s island-building initiatives in the South China Sea, and the China Harbor Engineering Company (CHEC). The location of the port on the Canal has since allowed China to capitalize on Canal expansion. Additionally, in March 2021 the Panamanian government began the process of renewing the lease of Hutchison Ports PPC, a subsidiary of Hong Kong–based CK Hutchison Holdings, which serves as operator for the ports of Balboa and Cristobal, two major hubs of the Canal’s Pacific and Atlantic outlets, respectively.
Furthermore, in 2018, a Chinese consortium led by CHEC and CCCC announced it was awarded a $1.4 billion contract for the Canal’s fourth bridge, which then-president Varela called “the fifth most important project in the history of the country.” More recently, China Construction Americas finished the Amador Convention Center along the Pacific side of the Canal, a project contracted under the Varela government and funded by Chinese loans. China has also invested in energy-related facilities along the Canal. For example, the Chinese group Shanghai Gorgeous invested $900 million to build a natural gas–fired electricity generation facility. As an economic foothold into Latin America, the Panama Canal is no doubt an important gateway for China’s bid for broader presence and a logistical hub for Chinese goods entering the region.
Psst. Building bridges doesn't threaten any of that. Take a powder or something, princess.*Beekeeper » 30 Dec 2024, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑ No, DICKFACE, they can't "do with it as they please". IF anything Panama does to affect NEUTRALITY OF SHIPPING through the canal, or another FOREIGN NATION POSES A THREAT TO DO THE SAME, the US CAN ACT!!
The TREATY that give them back "control" ALSO has a provision that IF they **** up and let adversaries come into play WE CAN TAKE IT BACK!!
And one AGAIN, you show how **** STUPID YOU ARE and that the **** that dribbles out your PIE HOLE is nothing but more lefty dibble **** without an iota of knowledge or FACTUAL INFORMATION!! Just LEFTY DRIBBLE **** flowing from your COCK HOLSTER!!
“The Treaty Concerning the Permanent Neutrality and Operation of the Panama Canal, or the Neutrality Treaty, stated that the United States could use its military to defend the Panama Canal against any threat to its neutrality, thus allowing perpetual U.S. usage of the Canal,” the State Department says.
And the IRONY of that is, that's from your boy BYE-DUMB's State Department!!
Sucks, huh that you just got your *** CURB STOMPED!!
https://i.postimg.cc/XqD4DDBg/pointing-laughing.jpg
Well, you've taken it on yourself to call him fraudy. So give us your evidence that he's committed some fraud. That him speakum with forked tongue.ROG62 » 30 Dec 2024, 10:53 pm » wrote: ↑ he's not, frank...
he's made specious comments that I've called him out on...IOW, he doesn't back up HIS ****...
ROG62 » 27 Dec 2024, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑ he’s says **** to trigger people…you and brown, two peas on the opposite ends of a pod…
well, if the **** search engine “worked”…Cannonpointer » 30 Dec 2024, 10:58 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, you've taken it on yourself to call him fraudy. So give us your evidence that he's committed some fraud. That him speakum with forked tongue.
That shouldn't be hard.
Guaranteed he does in which he clickbait’s the media into a handwringing frenzy triggering the opposition…I learned soon after his 2016 inauguration, his comments need to be taken with a salt block….impartialobserver » 31 Dec 2024, 11:09 am » wrote: ↑ This is most likely correct. Trump says these hare-brained things in order to get people worked up. I guess we could take over the Canal but everything has a cost. Greenland, I would strongly oppose the US taking over Greenland. They have been trying to be independent for years.. so therefore not under the thumb of the US or Denmark.
Uh huh.
Putin is in possession of 20% of Ukraine, in spite of the best efforts of 40 nations to prevent that, you stupid old woman.nefarious101 » 29 Dec 2024, 6:27 am » wrote: ↑ Hey Dickhead who calls himself "Sumela a ***'s ***"....
Panama will do what Trump tells them to do...just like Pootin' will.
****...oh, and nice dodge...
Cannonpointer » 01 Jan 2025, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑ Putin is in possession of 20% of Ukraine, in spite of the best efforts of 40 nations to prevent that, you stupid old woman.
What Trump will tell Putin to do is keep the change in Ukraine, bitch. So, YEAH. Putin WILL do what Trump says.
He will remain in Ukraine and Make Russia Large Again.