Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2025, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2025, 1:36 pm

Allow me to make my case....

the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design

how many families? 

How many designs?

NO QUESTIONJS, DICK SUCKER!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif

 

Cannonpointer » 03 Jan 2025, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 10:39 am

NO QUESTIONJS, DICK SUCKER!

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/be/10/d3 ... fb8c8a.gif

Just curious….do you know how many times a poster is obligated to answer the same question over the years
 

Blackvegetable » 02 Jan 2025, 1:56 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2025, 1:56 pm

Some people process and synthesize information much faster than others.

 

Synthesizing information is statistical averaging the whole population of ancestral lineages existing in specific generation gaps into incomplete parts claiming a missing link in evolving daily here as genetically eternally separated in plain sight.

Factual accounting of life cradle to grave beyond time adapting since conceived to decomposed is factual not actually accurate any rotation forward since dawn of civilization calculated to around 7,000 years ago.

*Huey » 02 Jan 2025, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2025, 12:24 pm

We got a couple of those around here.

https://studyfinds.org/science-confirms ... hey-think/

Watch how the Know-It-All dispenses with citations in favor of his own idea of "proof"..

By all means, first tell us your experience firing both weapons and then answer the challenge.  If there was only one design there would not be at least two lists.  Military and civilian.  And remember, The BATF disagrees with you.  

Your refusal to take the challenge ad back up your argument is proof you lost.

 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2025, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 12:49 pm

Watch how the Know-It-All dispenses with citations in favor of his own idea of "proof"..

Wrong thread.  But since you are here let me show you how a man does it with a link:

*Huey
Proud PFC
      
Posts: 24,317Politics: LiberaconContact: 
Contact *HueyMoney: 224,308                    

•  
•  
•  
•  
•  

Blackvegetable »  11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
11 minutes ago
If you can make the case that it is relevant to the text of the citation.

The citation, dum dum, is from the citation I posted in the challenge.  You are a perfect example of the theory put forth in the know it all thread.  You have only PART of the information and you are making decisions based on a lack of info.


viewtopic.php?p=2678893#p2678893


Than you for proving the point of the OP.  You still don't realize you are using MY link.

*Huey » 02 Jan 2025, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2025, 12:24 pm

We got a couple of those around here.

https://studyfinds.org/science-confirms ... hey-think/

The citation, dum dum, is from the citation I posted in the challenge.  You are a perfect example of the theory put forth in the know it all thread.  You have only PART of the information and you are making decisions based on a lack of info.

The citation contains all the info I need..


This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design


The citation is unambiguous...

1 family, 1 design.


What other information is necessary?
 

*Huey » 03 Jan 2025, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 12:58 pm

Wrong thread.  But since you are here let me show you how a man does it with a link:

*Huey
Proud PFC
      
Posts: 24,317Politics: LiberaconContact: 
Contact *HueyMoney: 224,308                    

•  
•  
•  
•  
•  

The citation, dum dum, is from the citation I posted in the challenge.  You are a perfect example of the theory put forth in the know it all thread.  You have only PART of the information and you are making decisions based on a lack of info.

viewtopic.php?p=2678893#p2678893

Than you for proving the point of the OP.  You still don't realize you are using MY link.

It was never YOUR link...you can't even read it.

Were you capable of so doing, you would immediately understand why you are completely wrong, Know-It-All...

Here the Know-It-All asserts OWNERSHIP of the citation with which he is in direct conflict.

No, actually, dum dum, what you are posting is the beginning of the wiki page I gave you from year ago.  Now answer the challenge, accept your loss, and NEVER bring this **** of yours up again.

Ownership, you see, includes the right to freely interpret the words contained within. All rules of syntax must be abandoned in favor of the Narrative.

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2025, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 1:04 pm

*Huey » 03 Jan 2025, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 12:58 pm

Wrong thread.  But since you are here let me show you how a man does it with a link:

*Huey
Proud PFC
      
Posts: 24,317Politics: LiberaconContact: 
Contact *HueyMoney: 224,308                    

•  
•  
•  
•  
•  

The citation, dum dum, is from the citation I posted in the challenge.  You are a perfect example of the theory put forth in the know it all thread.  You have only PART of the information and you are making decisions based on a lack of info.

viewtopic.php?p=2678893#p2678893

Than you for proving the point of the OP.  You still don't realize you are using MY link.

It was never YOUR link...you can't even read it.

Were you capable of so doing, you would immediately understand why you are completely wrong, Know-It-All...

 

I gave you the citation you have been posting, du dum.  

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2025, 1:01 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 1:01 pm

*Huey » 02 Jan 2025, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Jan 2025, 12:24 pm

We got a couple of those around here.

https://studyfinds.org/science-confirms ... hey-think/

The citation, dum dum, is from the citation I posted in the challenge.  You are a perfect example of the theory put forth in the know it all thread.  You have only PART of the information and you are making decisions based on a lack of info.

The citation contains all the info I need..


This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design


The citation is unambiguous...

1 family, 1 design.


What other information is necessary?
 

 

Yet, multiple lists and models.  Take the challenge, coward.   

*Huey » 03 Jan 2025, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 1:36 pm

I gave you the citation you have been posting, du dum.  

Yet, multiple lists and models.  Take the challenge, coward.

I challenge you to read the introduction to "your" citation.

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design have been produced by numerous manufacturers and have been used by nations around the world, some of which created their own variations. The tables here are split into a variety of categories and provide an overview of different subtypes. For purposes of these tables, bold model numbers are weapons used (or previously used) by the U.S. Military while italic model numbers are weapons for commercial or export sale. See Glossary of terms for an explanation of each column

Watch, as the Know-It-All once again dismisses evidence in favor of its narrative.

This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design have been produced by numerous manufacturers and have been used by nations around the world, some of which created their own variations. The tables here are split into a variety of categories and provide an overview of different subtypes. For purposes of these tables, bold model numbers are weapons used (or previously used) by the U.S. Military while italic model numbers are weapons for commercial or export sale. See Glossary of terms for an explanation of each column

viewtopic.php?p=2678930#p2678930

Answer the challenge.  That is the only way you will win.  

Notice how THE ONLY way to the Truth of the matter (easily established by reading the citation) is through the consent of the Know-It-All. 

 

Cannonpointer » 03 Jan 2025, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 10:36 am

Sounds like an idiot savant. I have an older brother who is an idiot savant. He's bad at just about everything.

He's a genius at one thing - and one thing only. But we haven't figured out what that is, yet. 

Late bloomer, is my diagnosis.

LOL!  Hopefully he has a nice disposition and is not too difficult to be around. Nothing is worse than a mean idiot.
   
 

Here the cowardly Know-It-All rejects the authority of the citation over which he proclaims dominion....

Answering the challenge is how you provide said evidence.  The only thing honestly answering will cause you to lose is a little pride.  And I leave for a week.  

If there was only ONE design there would only be on list and everything on that list would have Been classified a machine gun by the BATF.

Objective fact is an offense to the Know-It-All because, as he knows, he knows it all. Objective fact has no reason to live. 

If there was only ONE design

There IS only one design. 

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2025, 3:55 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 3:55 pm

Here the cowardly Know-It-All rejects the authority of the citation over which he proclaims dominion....

Objective fact is an offense to the Know-It-All because, as he knows, he knows it all. Objective fact has no reason to live. 

There IS only one design.

Lmao!  From a cubicle dweller who had no experience with either weapon and who had a father who knew he couldn’t handle the military.

Next time, coward, quote me so I know you have something dumb to say.

you know where to find me ****, who I am, what I look like and my address.

i look forward to it.  Anywhere in a 35 mile radius except east.

*Huey » 03 Jan 2025, 5:30 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 5:30 pm

Lmao!  From a cubicle dweller who had no experience with either weapon and who had a father who knew he couldn’t handle the military.

Next time, coward, quote me so I know you have something dumb to say.

you know where to find me ****, who I am, what I look like and my address.

i look forward to it.  Anywhere in a 35 mile radius except east.

Huddling in the ruins of your failed thread...

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2025, 5:36 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 5:36 pm

Huddling in the ruins of your failed thread...

you are a failure for not even trying to answer questions.

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2025, 5:36 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 5:36 pm

Huddling in the ruins of your failed thread...

LMAO!  I huddle from no one.  That's your gig, Richard.  As I said, you know my name, what I look like, and my address.  I am sitting on the porch waiting for you to back up years of empty threats.

On this topic, you lost.  You had no clue that the citation you were posting was from the the link I posted in the challenge.  You [roved the study correct that idiots know it alls who have only partial info take ill informed stands.

Thanks for playing, Cubicle.  You lost the challenge and lost on this thread.

God, it is so easy to reel you in.  You don't think this was the plan all along?  LMAO!  I fucing own you, KK.

When you coming to Hampton Roads, TOUGH GUY. Tomorrow I will be at the Superior Gun and Pawn gun range in Hampton VA.  

Here is the Address and directions.  Show me what a tough guy you are:

https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Salem,+ ... FQAw%3D%3D
 

*Huey » 03 Jan 2025, 5:52 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 5:52 pm

LMAO!  I huddle from no one.  That's your gig, Richard.  As I said, you know my name, what I look like, and my address.  I am sitting on the porch waiting for you to back up years of empty threats.

On this topic, you lost.  You had no clue that the citation you were posting was from the the link I posted in the challenge.  You [roved the study correct that idiots know it alls who have only partial info take ill informed stands.

Thanks for playing, Cubicle.  You lost the challenge and lost on this thread.

God, it is so easy to reel you in.  You don't think this was the plan all along?  LMAO!  I fucing own you, KK.

When you coming to Hampton Roads, TOUGH GUY. Tomorrow I will be at the Superior Gun and Pawn gun range in Hampton VA.  

Here is the Address and directions.  Show me what a tough guy you are:

https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Salem,+ ... FQAw%3D%3D

Tiny,

ONE keystroke was too far today.

ONE.

Blackvegetable » 03 Jan 2025, 6:17 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 6:17 pm

*Huey » 03 Jan 2025, 5:52 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 5:52 pm

LMAO!  I huddle from no one.  That's your gig, Richard.  As I said, you know my name, what I look like, and my address.  I am sitting on the porch waiting for you to back up years of empty threats.

On this topic, you lost.  You had no clue that the citation you were posting was from the the link I posted in the challenge.  You [roved the study correct that idiots know it alls who have only partial info take ill informed stands.

Thanks for playing, Cubicle.  You lost the challenge and lost on this thread.

God, it is so easy to reel you in.  You don't think this was the plan all along?  LMAO!  I fucing own you, KK.

When you coming to Hampton Roads, TOUGH GUY. Tomorrow I will be at the Superior Gun and Pawn gun range in Hampton VA.  

Here is the Address and directions.  Show me what a tough guy you are:

https://www.google.com/maps/dir/Salem,+ ... FQAw%3D%3D

Tiny,

ONE keystroke was too far today.

ONE.

 

KK,

I answered those questions today, yesterday, and dozens of times in the past.  Once you put a numerical value on how many times I am obligated to answer those questions I will answer them one last time and add them to my sig box for when you forget yet again.

If you are too stupid to remember, to drug addled to remember, or just a a retard, let me know.  You have one more chance.  But you have to fulfill that one conditioin.

Now, you ow where to find me. Let me know when you are coming, Tough Guy.  I came to you and you huddled in fear.  

*Huey » 03 Jan 2025, 6:24 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Jan 2025, 6:24 pm

KK,

I answered those questions today, yesterday, and dozens of times in the past.  Once you put a numerical value on how many times I am obligated to answer those questions I will answer them one last time and add them to my sig box for when you forget yet again.

If you are too stupid to remember, to drug addled to remember, or just a a retard, let me know.  You have one more chance.  But you have to fulfill that one conditioin.

Now, you ow where to find me. Let me know when you are coming, Tough Guy.  I came to you and you huddled in fear.

No.

You are a contemptible coward...

You don't answer questions...not even

"Are these your words?"