One that understands self evident time living as eternally separated since conceived changing form daily here now never same total sum again as the heartbeat before each one arriving next, or not.Blackvegetable » 05 Jan 2025, 11:05 am » wrote: ↑ Then define "being a mature adult".
So "everything" will be clear.
Unless you define it we'll only have your word for it, Pilgrim...ConsRule » 05 Jan 2025, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑ If you need "being a mature adult" defined for you, you will never be one...in my opinion.
Carry on.
OK, Jane Wayne.Blackvegetable » 05 Jan 2025, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Unless you define it we'll only have your word for it, Pilgrim...
If you had balls we'd be done by now.ConsRule » 05 Jan 2025, 1:41 pm » wrote: ↑ OK, Jane Wayne.
If you were capable of independent though, you would be able to come up with a definition of your own.
If you would stop sexually abusing small animals the world would be a better place.
Grand Juries are NOTORIOUS for being the PAWNS, of the CORRUPT !
Trump is and always will be a convicted felon in the annals of history.ConservativeWave » 05 Jan 2025, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Grand Juries are NOTORIOUS for being the PAWNS, of the CORRUPT !
YOU IGNORAMUS !!
Squatchman » 06 Jan 2025, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ Trump is and always will be a convicted felon in the annals of history.
Quite the legacy huh?
Trumps conviction is becoming more and more OBVIOUSLY an example of the Democrats WEAPONIZATION of the legal system... The puppet Judges and Lawyers are trying to SAVE the conviction... but TRUMP will win in the end... either by the case being dropped (less likely now), or on appeal (after the sentence is formalized). HOWEVER, REST ASSURED... the Democrats WEAPONIZATION of the Federal legal system will be INVESTIGATED... HONESTLY and THOROUGHLY, and the HEADS the Judges and Lawyers involved will ROLL !!Squatchman » 06 Jan 2025, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑ Trump is and always will be a convicted felon in the annals of history.
Quite the legacy huh?
I never heard please post the commentsBlackvegetable » 05 Jan 2025, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑ I bet you never heard the comment of the grand juror to whom the evidence was presented.
NOR WILL he be... after the appeal is WON !
“Any good prosecutor can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich.”
does that make everyone indicted innocent, Sheilagh?*Huey » 06 Jan 2025, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑ “Any good prosecutor can get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich.”
Since when?ConservativeWave » 05 Jan 2025, 5:10 pm » wrote: ↑ Grand Juries are NOTORIOUS for being the PAWNS, of the CORRUPT !
YOU IGNORAMUS !!
KeyBoard Komando,Blackvegetable » 06 Jan 2025, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ does that make everyone indicted innocent, Sheilagh?
Is that your point?
No more than it makes everyone indicted guilty.does that make everyone indicted innocent, Sheilagh?
*Huey » 06 Jan 2025, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑ KeyBoard Komando,
Nope & nope.
No more than it makes everyone indicted guilty.
and you believe this ******* **** is "clever .No more than it makes everyone indicted guilty.
Blackvegetable » 06 Jan 2025, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ and you believe this ******* **** is "clever .
Grand juries don't determine guilt.
So **** g'ddammned stupid
Blackvegetable » 06 Jan 2025, 11:10 am » wrote: ↑ and you believe this ******* **** is "clever .
Grand juries don't determine guilt.
So **** g'ddammned stupid
Duh. I never said they did, KK.Grand juries don't determine guilt.
*Huey » 06 Jan 2025, 11:28 am » wrote: ↑ Duh. I never said they did, KK.
ANd Typically, there is no defense lawyer or defense witnesses.
explain why you believe that matters.ANd Typically, there is no defense lawyer or defense witnesses.