Because you lie.FJB » 08 Jan 2025, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑ Again, answer this question. Why do you have to make deals to answer questions?
Blackvegetable » 08 Jan 2025, 7:41 am » wrote: ↑ Because you lie.
You were just answered again, Slizzy
I just did.
Yes...you failed to answer the question again, Duck.
Blackvegetable » 08 Jan 2025, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑ Yes...you failed to answer the question again, Duck.
Squatchman » 08 Jan 2025, 8:58 am » wrote: ↑ It was a good shoot.
She **** around and found out.
When someone is pointing a gun at you and you keep moving towards them what do you think will happen?
This video has been out for 4 years.
The right wing media didn't play it because it actually shows trump supporters being violent and didn't fit in with their narrative.
There's more of the same thing if you aren't afraid of the truth.
You looking at something different than Skans did?FJB » 08 Jan 2025, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑ THE VIDEO SAYS DIFFERENT... **** *** BRYD WILL BE DOING THE PERP WALK SOON.
I tend to agree with that - he was a cop, standards are different for a cop when one or a number of angry people are trying to advance on him. He will not be convicted of any crime, even if charged.
Yes, she did.She **** around and found out.
While I've seen similar videos, I haven't seen this one.This video has been out for 4 years.
If there truly were, videos to support Democrats' claims of insurrection, you would have posted it in this thread by now.There's more of the same thing if you aren't afraid of the truth.
It does show supporters trashing the place.Skans » 08 Jan 2025, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑ I tend to agree with that - he was a cop, standards are different for a cop when one or a number of angry people are trying to advance on him. He will not be convicted of any crime, even if charged.
Yes, she did.
While I've seen similar videos, I haven't seen this one.
This video certainly doesn't support any coordinated effort with Donald Trump to engage in an insurrection. Quite to the contrary, it shows a few (3) individuals acting violently and damaging government property. However, nothing compared to the damage BLM rioters and looters did to government and private property.
If there truly were, videos to support Democrats' claims of insurrection, you would have posted it in this thread by now.
He was responsible for the safety of the people behind him. He could certainly reasonably fear for THEIR safety, and that would justify shooting an unarmed intruder. Because really, she was not unarmed. She was armed with a gang enacting violence against the property in a clear attempt to gain entry and gain access to the people and property he was charged with protecting.RebelGator » 07 Jan 2025, 6:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Do you believe the cop feared for his life from an unarmed woman? He sounds like a coward to me, and I don't throw that term around loosely.
Squatchman » 08 Jan 2025, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑ You looking at something different than Skans did?
Or are you just refusing to see what's real?
It's all there.
Byrd will live a long and fruitful life. He did nothing wrong.
Babbitt on the other hand............?
It is extremely awkward. You are the very last person to talk about shielding one's eyes from evidence, effeminate groomer.Blackvegetable » 07 Jan 2025, 8:39 pm » wrote: ↑ You wouldn't believe some of the sworn testimony before the Jan 6th committee...
Wait...you refused to...
This is awkward.
It was about protecting the people he was hired to protect, and stopping the forward movement of a mob.
People testifying with a gun to their heads are generally not granted a great deal of consideration.Blackvegetable » 08 Jan 2025, 7:16 am » wrote: ↑ If seeing the evidence informs your view of Babbitt imagine what seeing Grifty's own legal counsel testifying under oath would do to your perspective.
It's tough to critically consider that which you've determined to ignore.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!
It showed 3 protesters doing damage to the Capital.Squatchman » 08 Jan 2025, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑ It does show supporters trashing the place.
There are many more videos of trump supporters acting violently. Especially assaulting police.
Also I never post links or video to this site.
Nor do I click on them.
It isn't worth the effort.
Well, you still haven't posted any in this thread.There are many more videos of trump supporters acting violently.
This doesn't make sense. The links to videos supporting your assertions would come from OTHER sites.Also I never post links or video to this site.
Of course, that's your choice. You just aren't very convincing when you say many more videos are out there showing trump supporters acting violently.It isn't worth the effort.
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!Blackvegetable » 08 Jan 2025, 7:38 am » wrote: ↑ I show that you're lying, and you turn yourself in to the FBI for being a multi state groomer.
Deal?
NO QUESTIONS, DICK SUCKER!