Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2025, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 12:39 pm

He had that opportunity. 

He was convicted.

On all counts, in little more time than it took to read them.

Your peers convicted him, not his.....you know the types......buckwheats, queers, trannies, dog humpers, and other assorted ***, you know...like Democrats. 

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2025, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 11:56 am

Is that how you cope with your self debasement?

 

Obviously you posting here is how you handle your own self debasing your body, from your mind. Shame your brain was the nucleus of your specific fertilized cell.

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2025, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 12:39 pm

He had that opportunity. 

He was convicted.

On all counts, in little more time than it took to read them.

Now the appeals process can begin.

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2025, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 11:56 am

Is that how you cope with your self debasement?

Hey BV,  You don't have to be so lonely anymore:
Sexy life-size AI robot that talks, expresses emotion can be your girlfriend for a hefty price: ‘It remembers who you are’



https://nypost.com/2025/01/10/tech/sexy ... o-you-are/
 
 

Cedar » 10 Jan 2025, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 12:37 pm

Any sane person would defend themselves.

If it makes you feel any worse, these fraudulent trials probably put Trump back in the White House.

**chuckle**

I see it that way. They sure didn't hurt.
Like his first campaign. The stupid media's hate on display was major publicity.

Stupid prosecutor's hate helped last campaign.

I think "45-47" will be the hallmark before "felon president" even has a chance.
(Felon president still sounds better than **** Joe Biden!)

ConsRule » 10 Jan 2025, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 1:11 pm

Now the appeals process can begin.

Where Grifty has, historically, done so weĺl.

RebelGator » 10 Jan 2025, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 1:04 pm

Your peers convicted him, not his.....you know the types......buckwheats, queers, trannies, dog humpers, and other assorted ***, you know...like Democrats.

men who spend a great deal of time on their hair and makeup?

Probably groomed by sodomites...

*Huey » 10 Jan 2025, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 12:44 pm

Yup, he was.  Shrug.

Jan 20 you now where he will be.

Below Buchanan? 

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2025, 2:15 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 2:15 pm

Below Buchanan?

312 Will become 47.   

Fuelman » 10 Jan 2025, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 11:32 am

I believe Pam Bondi will be taking a hard look at the connection between these Trump cases and the DOJ/Whitehouse.

There is no doubt that is in the mix. And when she finds felonious acts, she WILL PROSECUTE THEM!! And there won't be any delay in it happening either. She's one tough cookie and pretty damn easy on the eyes too. LOL.

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2025, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 7:46 am

In spite of the last minute call to his flunky on the bench...

The proceedings are set to begin at 9:30 a.m. Though the president-elect is expected to avoid jail time, his sentencing on 34 counts will formalize his status as a felon and make him the first to carry that distinction into the White House.

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/01/10 ... sentencing

"But the Narod!.....(....sniff....)"....snot bubble bursts.

Lying **** traitor ***.

*Beekeeper » 10 Jan 2025, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 2:17 pm

There is no doubt that is in the mix. And when she finds felonious acts, she WILL PROSECUTE THEM!! And there won't be any delay in it happening either. She's one tough cookie and pretty damn easy on the eyes too. LOL.

I would love to see her make Garland cry!

Not too far off from the 10 year anniversary of Trump coming down the escalator. Just about anything and everything has been thrown at Trump and he's still standing. That's impressive considering the extraordinary effort put up by the Democrat machine and damn near all the media.

I believe more people than ever have a close eye on what is about to transpire.
 

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2025, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 2:05 pm

Where Grifty has, historically, done so weĺl.

I have a feeling the first move will be to challenge the constitutionality of the law.

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2025, 2:05 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 2:05 pm

Where Grifty has, historically, done so weĺl.

**** you ya lying traitor ***.

*Beekeeper » 10 Jan 2025, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 2:17 pm

There is no doubt that is in the mix. And when she finds felonious acts, she WILL PROSECUTE THEM!! And there won't be any delay in it happening either. She's one tough cookie and pretty damn easy on the eyes too. LOL.

What changes between Biden saying he won't pardon Hunter and Trump saying he won't go after politicians abusing their office and when he does it won't be just because they went after him since November 2016. the DOJ and this country's whole court system has been working that way decades before the 20216 election.

I know from family experience how the whole charade operates since 2005 when the media went after a sibling of mine nationally for a local county legal matter. It was what created my ambition to get even with the whole system, not just one department in 5 levels governing people cradle to grave..

ConsRule » 10 Jan 2025, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 3:37 pm

I have a feeling the first move will be to challenge the constitutionality of the law.

The FIRST challenge will be the FAILURE of Merchan to require a unanimous verdict on the "underlying crime" that Bragg used to make it a felony!! This is COUNT 1 of violation of the Constitutional rights of a defendant.

Because NO EVIDENCE was introduced to PROVE any "underlying crime" happened NOR was any "underlying crime' even introduced in an indictment OR during the trial. Merchan SHOULD have completely dismissed this case based on that alone, but his HATE OF TRUMP clouded his mind and judgement. The US Constitution REQUIRES that element of a impartiality happen or it's a TOTAL **** trial!!

And the NEXT one will be Merchan donating to DEMOCRAT CANDIDATES and that is a TOTAL prohibition in NY STATE LAW!!

The list goes on and on, but that's 3 MAJOR defects in this case that WILL result in a complete DISMISSAL of this "conviction" and a TOSSING of the verdict by either the NY State Supreme court or the SCOTUS if it gets to them. 
 

*Beekeeper » 10 Jan 2025, 4:29 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 4:29 pm

The FIRST challenge will be the FAILURE of Merchan to require a unanimous verdict on the "underlying crime" that Bragg used to make it a felony!! This is COUNT 1 of violation of the Constitutional rights of a defendant.

Because NO EVIDENCE was introduced to PROVE any "underlying crime" happened NOR was any "underlying crime' even introduced in an indictment OR during the trial. Merchan SHOULD have completely dismissed this case based on that alone, but his HATE OF TRUMP clouded his mind and judgement. The US Constitution REQUIRES that element of a impartiality happen or it's a TOTAL **** trial!!

And the NEXT one will be Merchan donating to DEMOCRAT CANDIDATES and that is a TOTAL prohibition in NY STATE LAW!!

The list goes on and on, but that's 3 MAJOR defects in this case that WILL result in a complete DISMISSAL of this "conviction" and a TOSSING of the verdict by either the NY State Supreme court or the SCOTUS if it gets to them.

That is why there were "experts" saying the law is unconstitutional while the trial was in process.  Since Trump is the only person to be prosecuted under this law, someone now has legal standing to challenge it's constitutionality.
 

ConsRule » 10 Jan 2025, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 4:55 pm

That is why there were "experts" saying the law is unconstitutional while the trial was in process.  Since Trump is the only person to be prosecuted under this law, someone now has legal standing to challenge it's constitutionality.

Even CNN's Honig is saying that this entire trial was FRAUGHT with errors and Constitutional violations.

When HE goes that far, it's doomed as to this conviction holding water.

ConsRule » 10 Jan 2025, 4:55 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 4:55 pm

That is why there were "experts" saying the law is unconstitutional while the trial was in process.  Since Trump is the only person to be prosecuted under this law, someone now has legal standing to challenge it's constitutionality.

Since Trump is the only person to be prosecuted under this law, someone now has legal standing to challenge it's constitutionality.

****.

*Beekeeper » 10 Jan 2025, 4:29 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 4:29 pm

The FIRST challenge will be the FAILURE of Merchan to require a unanimous verdict on the "underlying crime" that Bragg used to make it a felony!! This is COUNT 1 of violation of the Constitutional rights of a defendant.

Because NO EVIDENCE was introduced to PROVE any "underlying crime" happened NOR was any "underlying crime' even introduced in an indictment OR during the trial. Merchan SHOULD have completely dismissed this case based on that alone, but his HATE OF TRUMP clouded his mind and judgement. The US Constitution REQUIRES that element of a impartiality happen or it's a TOTAL **** trial!!

And the NEXT one will be Merchan donating to DEMOCRAT CANDIDATES and that is a TOTAL prohibition in NY STATE LAW!!

The list goes on and on, but that's 3 MAJOR defects in this case that WILL result in a complete DISMISSAL of this "conviction" and a TOSSING of the verdict by either the NY State Supreme court or the SCOTUS if it gets to them.

The FIRST challenge will be the FAILURE of Merchan to require a unanimous verdict on the "underlying crime" that Bragg used to make it a felony

****.

Because NO EVIDENCE was introduced to PROVE any "underlying crime" happened NOR was any "underlying crime' even introduced in an indictment OR during the trial. Merchan SHOULD have completely dismissed this case based on that alone,

****.

And the NEXT one will be Merchan donating to DEMOCRAT CANDIDATES and that is a TOTAL prohibition in NY STATE LAW!!

 ****.