Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Felon in Residence....
Felon in Residence....
By Blackvegetable
10 Jan 2025 6:46 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
10 Jan 2025 5:23 pm
10 Jan 2025 5:23 pm
Electoral college.Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2025, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑ In spite of the last minute call to his flunky on the bench...
The proceedings are set to begin at 9:30 a.m. Though the president-elect is expected to avoid jail time, his sentencing on 34 counts will formalize his status as a felon and make him the first to carry that distinction into the White House.
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/01/10 ... sentencing
"But the Narod!.....(....sniff....)"....snot bubble bursts.
Popular vote.
You must have really sucked some ***, to lose to a felon.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
10 Jan 2025 6:18 pm
Coming from someone as stupid as you...the post isn't worth further comment.
10 Jan 2025 6:28 pm
just chew on this brown...
34 felony convictions, unconditional discharge...
it's an epic fail, brown...EPIC!
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
10 Jan 2025 6:29 pm
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
10 Jan 2025 6:32 pm
...vanity fair...Kaplan...*Huey » 10 Jan 2025, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑ He'll never admit it. He still can't admit he was wrong about Russia Russia Trump.
one thing for sure, brown knows how to cling...like stink to ****...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
10 Jan 2025 6:33 pm
let's hope...Fuelman » 10 Jan 2025, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑ Stay tuned for "Lawfare Part 2"!
I suspect in part 2, someone actually goes to jail.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
10 Jan 2025 6:35 pm
Cedar » 10 Jan 2025, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑ No need to cope.
You get to stroke yourself for a few months calling your President a felon, until the conviction is overturned. The fantasy is usually better than the ****, this seems almost impotent. "We got him this time" But what did you actually get, a new President?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
10 Jan 2025 6:40 pm
above joe....
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..." 
11 Jan 2025 5:11 am
Right, the TDS may not be what put Trump back in the white house (that would be the scary woke cackling alternative) but it sure didn't hurt..DeezerShoove » 10 Jan 2025, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑ I see it that way. They sure didn't hurt.
Like his first campaign. The stupid media's hate on display was major publicity.
Stupid prosecutor's hate helped last campaign.
I think "45-47" will be the hallmark before "felon president" even has a chance.
(Felon president still sounds better than **** Joe Biden!)
In memory of Pumpkins
11 Jan 2025 6:03 am
You can call "****" all you want, NOW BACK IT UP, ASSHOLE!!
I can, but since you are the "intelligent one", FIND THE LINKS AND POST THEM!!
YOUR CLAIM, YOU NEED TO PROVE IT!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
11 Jan 2025 6:13 am
good luck on that one...the U.S. will have a balanced budget and the debt paid off before then...*Beekeeper » 11 Jan 2025, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑ You can call "****" all you want, NOW BACK IT UP, ASSHOLE!!
I can, but since you are the "intelligent one", FIND THE LINKS AND POST THEM!!
YOUR CLAIM, YOU NEED TO PROVE IT!!
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
11 Jan 2025 6:24 am
apparently you didn't "read the judge's filing"....ConsRule » 10 Jan 2025, 7:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Coming from someone as stupid as you...the post isn't worth further comment.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
11 Jan 2025 6:37 am
Hey @Blackvegetable DICKSUCK....*Beekeeper » 10 Jan 2025, 4:29 pm » wrote: ↑ The FIRST challenge will be the FAILURE of Merchan to require a unanimous verdict on the "underlying crime" that Bragg used to make it a felony!! This is COUNT 1 of violation of the Constitutional rights of a defendant.
Because NO EVIDENCE was introduced to PROVE any "underlying crime" happened NOR was any "underlying crime' even introduced in an indictment OR during the trial. Merchan SHOULD have completely dismissed this case based on that alone, but his HATE OF TRUMP clouded his mind and judgement. The US Constitution REQUIRES that element of a impartiality happen or it's a TOTAL **** trial!!
And the NEXT one will be Merchan donating to DEMOCRAT CANDIDATES and that is a TOTAL prohibition in NY STATE LAW!!
The list goes on and on, but that's 3 MAJOR defects in this case that WILL result in a complete DISMISSAL of this "conviction" and a TOSSING of the verdict by either the NY State Supreme court or the SCOTUS if it gets to them.
1. On points 1 and 2 above....Legal scholars say a defendant’s right to a fair trial and due process is undermined when the specific charge they are facing is not spelled out for them to defend properly.
That was what happened, some experts argue, when Judge Juan Merchan directed jurors that they didn’t need to — under New York law — find the defendant unanimously guilty of committing a felony to resurrect the misdemeanor recordkeeping charges that had expired under the statute of limitations.
The judge instructed jurors that they would have to find only that Mr. Trump committed bookkeeping infractions to conceal a campaign finance violation, tax law infraction or falsification of business records. They didn’t have to agree on the underlying crime to find the former president guilty.
“The issue of the absence of a second crime is exactly the kind of legal question that would be prime for appellate review,” said John Yoo, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and a former Justice Department official.
Thomas Hogan, a professor at South Texas College of Law Houston, said an appeals court would be suspect of such instructions.
“The fact that the prosecution has not been forced to identify specifically the underlying crime that would make this business records case a felony — and the jurors apparently are each permitted to choose their own underlying crime, with no unanimity required — certainly would get a skeptical look from an appellate court,” he said.
AND THEN on the 3rd Point...
New York, like most US jurisdictions, has adopted language from the American Bar Association Model Code of Judicial Conduct, which prohibits judges from “soliciting funds for, paying an assessment to, or making a contribution to a political organization or candidate.”
Now DICKSUCKER, your turn to PROVE IT IS "****" as you claim!!!
GO, ****!!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
11 Jan 2025 6:43 am
john yoo*Beekeeper » 11 Jan 2025, 7:37 am » wrote: ↑ Hey @Blackvegetable DICKSUCK....
1. On points 1 and 2 above....Legal scholars say a defendant’s right to a fair trial and due process is undermined when the specific charge they are facing is not spelled out for them to defend properly.
That was what happened, some experts argue, when Judge Juan Merchan directed jurors that they didn’t need to — under New York law — find the defendant unanimously guilty of committing a felony to resurrect the misdemeanor recordkeeping charges that had expired under the statute of limitations.
The judge instructed jurors that they would have to find only that Mr. Trump committed bookkeeping infractions to conceal a campaign finance violation, tax law infraction or falsification of business records. They didn’t have to agree on the underlying crime to find the former president guilty.
“The issue of the absence of a second crime is exactly the kind of legal question that would be prime for appellate review,” said John Yoo, a professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and a former Justice Department official.
Thomas Hogan, a professor at South Texas College of Law Houston, said an appeals court would be suspect of such instructions.
“The fact that the prosecution has not been forced to identify specifically the underlying crime that would make this business records case a felony — and the jurors apparently are each permitted to choose their own underlying crime, with no unanimity required — certainly would get a skeptical look from an appellate court,” he said.
AND THEN on the 3rd Point...
New York, like most US jurisdictions, has adopted language from the American Bar Association Model Code of Judicial Conduct, which prohibits judges from “soliciting funds for, paying an assessment to, or making a contribution to a political organization or candidate.”
Now DICKSUCKER, your turn to PROVE IT IS "****" as you claim!!!
GO, ****!!!
:rofl:
where's your LINK?
11 Jan 2025 6:46 am
Roger,
On what grounds did Team Grifty petition for relief of the $2 million awarded Grifty's victim?
11 Jan 2025 6:47 am
NOT NEEDED since YOU HAVE PROVEN NOTHING IN YOUR CLAIM!!!
Sucks, huh, that MORE CURB STOMPINGS ARE FORTHCOMING your way!!
NOW, DICKSUCK, PROVE IT'S ****!! I PROVED IT WASN'T!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
11 Jan 2025 6:57 am
Are these your words?*Beekeeper » 11 Jan 2025, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑ NOT NEEDED since YOU HAVE PROVEN NOTHING IN YOUR CLAIM!!!
Sucks, huh, that MORE CURB STOMPINGS ARE FORTHCOMING your way!!
NOW, DICKSUCK, PROVE IT'S ****!! I PROVED IT WASN'T!!
You can call "****" all you want, NOW BACK IT UP, ASSHOLE!! I can, but since you are the "intelligent one", FIND THE LINKS AND POST THEM!!
11 Jan 2025 6:58 am
YOU posted NOTHING, so you can GO **** YOURSELF UNTIL YOU BACK UP YOUR "****" CLAIM!!
GO!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
11 Jan 2025 7:22 am
Who is online
In total there are 3260 users online :: 4 registered, 13 bots, and 3243 guests
Bots: DuckDuckBot, TTD-Content, proximic, Mojeek, ADmantX, CriteoBot, YandexBot, Mediapartners-Google, Applebot, facebookexternalhit, bingbot, curl/7, Googlebot