No.....I mean lying.ConsRule » 11 Jan 2025, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑ You mean like saying markets price forward and markets price backwards?
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Blackvegetable » 11 Jan 2025, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑ You failed to heed your own rule.
Again.
You're a **** idiot.
One of those market pricing comments of yours is a lie, *******.
ConsRule » 11 Jan 2025, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑ One of those market pricing comments of yours is a lie, *******.
Doesn't matter!
ConsRule » 11 Jan 2025, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑ One of those market pricing comments of yours is a lie, *******.
that follows from such a comment cannot possibly be worth reading.Zeets2 » 11 Jan 2025, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Doesn't matter!
Anything and everything that got you idiots a kangaroo "conviction" will be overturned on appeal, and those appeals will continue grinding their way through what will now be a fair Dept. of Justice while Trump is free to ignore such nonsense and works tirelessly to end any semblance of Biden's existence that has wrecked the country!
And the award for Most Gullible Biden ***-Licker goes to you, dickhead:
Unanimous jury convictions seldom get overturned.Zeets2 » 11 Jan 2025, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑ Doesn't matter!
Anything and everything that got you idiots a kangaroo "conviction" will be overturned on appeal, and those appeals will continue grinding their way through what will now be a fair Dept. of Justice while Trump is free to ignore such nonsense and works tirelessly to end any semblance of Biden's existence that has wrecked the country!
And the award for Most Gullible Biden ***-Licker goes to you, dickhead:
When the law is unconstitutional, they get overturned all the time. That will probably be the first grounds for appeal. When that is the grounds of the appeal, he most certainly CAN appeal to the Supreme Court.Squatchman » 12 Jan 2025, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑ Unanimous jury convictions seldom get overturned.
Grifty also can't apoeal to the supreme court.
His conviction will stand.
Factual truths defend intentional denial of self evident time alive practiced by people rather die in character than be alive equally timed apart in plain sight daily.
The law TFG violated wasn't unconstitutional.ConsRule » 12 Jan 2025, 8:19 am » wrote: ↑ When the law is unconstitutional, they get overturned all the time. That will probably be the first grounds for appeal. When that is the grounds of the appeal, he most certainly CAN appeal to the Supreme Court.
No teeth to that ....Squatchman » 12 Jan 2025, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑ The law TFG violated wasn't unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court won't even consider looking at it.
That would be taking states rights away and open them up to thousands of appeals.
TFG will forever remain a convict.
You know all about no teeth don't you?
Says you. People with vastly more legal knowledge disagree.Squatchman » 12 Jan 2025, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑ The law TFG violated wasn't unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court won't even consider looking at it.
That would be taking states rights away and open them up to thousands of appeals.
TFG will forever remain a convict.
the irony here is those people with vastly more legal knowledge cannot explain simple self evident evolving in plain sight limiting every reproduciton existing now is eternally separated here since conception.ConsRule » 12 Jan 2025, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑ Says you. People with vastly more legal knowledge disagree.
Lying *** **** stain.Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2025, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑ In spite of the last minute call to his flunky on the bench...
The proceedings are set to begin at 9:30 a.m. Though the president-elect is expected to avoid jail time, his sentencing on 34 counts will formalize his status as a felon and make him the first to carry that distinction into the White House.
https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/01/10 ... sentencing
"But the Narod!.....(....sniff....)"....snot bubble bursts.
In your dreams!Squatchman » 12 Jan 2025, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑ Unanimous jury convictions seldom get overturned.
Grifty also can't apoeal to the supreme court.
His conviction will stand.
No doubt you'll continue your efforts of crossing out opinions you're unable to tolerate seeing when Trump's convictions are all overturned on appeal.Blackvegetable » 11 Jan 2025, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑ that follows from such a comment cannot possibly be worth reading.
Uninformed opinion has no value.Zeets2 » 12 Jan 2025, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ No doubt you'll continue your efforts of crossing out opinions you're unable to tolerate seeing when Trump's convictions are all overturned on appeal.
Till then, keep up the exercise you seem to need!
Yeah, God forbid if you are only able to hang around an opinion website like this for only 8 hours a day instead of your typical 12 hour rants of stupidity day after day!