Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 12 Jan 2025, 11:43 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2025, 11:43 am

Uninformed opinion has no value.

My time does.
 

Uniformed opinions between generation gaps of ancestral lineages are nurtured after birth, not developed ancestors since conceived.

Squatchman » Yesterday, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 7:56 am

  Unanimous jury convictions seldom get overturned.
 Grifty also can't apoeal to the supreme court.

His conviction will stand.

Political conviction by traitors like you.

murdock » 12 Jan 2025, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2025, 2:02 pm

Political conviction by traitors like you.

You keep defending living to die being a character of your context learned after birth than the genetic results being alive since conception as eternally separated in plain sight daily.

Squatchman » 12 Jan 2025, 9:58 am » wrote: ↑

12 Jan 2025, 9:58 am

  The law TFG violated wasn't unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court won't even consider looking at it.
That would be taking states rights away and open them up to thousands of appeals.
TFG will forever remain a convict.

You ain't real **** smart, 

The "crime" that Bragg alleged was a FEDERAL CAMPAIGN VIOLATION. TRY to read into what Bragg said Trump did that made his little BOOKKEEPING ERROR a magical FELONLY!!

IN THAT CASE, THE STATE OF NEW YORK BEARS NO JURISDICTION OVER FEDERAL CAMPAIGN FINANCE VIOLATIONS!! NONE, ****, not a hint. THAT makes what Bragg did an UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND ILLEGAL ACTION in trying to persecute Trump. IF he was going to use THAT NY statute that was the UNDERLYING CRIME made it a felony, he HAD TO PROVE THAT AN UNDERLYING CRIME OCCURRED, which he didn't, and the FEDS HAD ALREADY DETERMINED THAT TRUMP HAD COMMITTED NO CAMPAIGN FINANCE VIOLATIONS!!

AND since you don't know, MERCHAN refused to allow ANY Testimony that would have PROVEN Trump did not commit any CAMPAIGN FINANCE "crime". TOTALLY A VIOLATION OF TRUMP'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!!

SO ASSHOLE, you got CURB STOMPED with this **** OF YOURS and you need to SHUT THE **** UP!!

 
 

*Beekeeper » 13 Jan 2025, 6:21 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 6:21 am

You ain't real **** smart, 

The "crime" that Bragg alleged was a FEDERAL CAMPAIGN VIOLATION. TRY to read into what Bragg said Trump did that made his little BOOKKEEPING ERROR a magical FELONLY!!

IN THAT CASE, THE STATE OF NEW YORK BEARS NO JURISDICTION OVER FEDERAL CAMPAIGN FINANCE VIOLATIONS!! NONE, ****, not a hint. THAT makes what Bragg did an UNCONSTITUTIONAL AND ILLEGAL ACTION in trying to persecute Trump. IF he was going to use THAT NY statute that was the UNDERLYING CRIME made it a felony, he HAD TO PROVE THAT AN UNDERLYING CRIME OCCURRED, which he didn't, and the FEDS HAD ALREADY DETERMINED THAT TRUMP HAD COMMITTED NO CAMPAIGN FINANCE VIOLATIONS!!

AND since you don't know, MERCHAN refused to allow ANY Testimony that would have PROVEN Trump did not commit any CAMPAIGN FINANCE "crime". TOTALLY A VIOLATION OF TRUMP'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!!

SO ASSHOLE, you got CURB STOMPED with this **** OF YOURS and you need to SHUT THE **** UP!!

did that made his little BOOKKEEPING ERROR

34 "errors", idiot.

IN THAT CASE, THE STATE OF NEW YORK BEARS NO JURISDICTION OVER FEDERAL CAMPAIGN FINANCE VIOLATIONS!! NONE, ****, not a hint

NY hasn't assumed federal jurisdiction. You don't understand a **** thing. He faces no sanction from the state for federal campaign violations.

THAT NY statute that was the UNDERLYING CRIME made it a felony, he HAD TO PROVE THAT AN UNDERLYING CRIME OCCURRED, which he didn't, and the FEDS HAD ALREADY DETERMINED THAT TRUMP HAD COMMITTED NO CAMPAIGN FINANCE VIOLATIONS!!

More uninformed ****. 

We KNOW a "crime occurred" because Cohen stipulated as part of his conviction.

The FEC was stacked, and failed to sanction Grifty as it should have.

AND since you don't know, MERCHAN refused to allow ANY Testimony that would have PROVEN Trump did not commit any CAMPAIGN FINANCE "crime". TOTALLY A VIOLATION OF TRUMP'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS!! 

This is ****.

Fondler,


You're an idiot.

Shut the **** up.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2025, 7:23 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 7:23 am

34 "errors", idiot.

NY hasn't assumed federal jurisdiction. You don't understand a **** thing. He faces no sanction from the state for federal campaign violations.

More uninformed ****. 

We KNOW a "crime occurred" because Cohen stipulated as part of his conviction.

The FEC was stacked, and failed to sanction Grifty as it should have.

This is ****.

Fondler,

You're an idiot.

Shut the **** up.

^^^ AND THIS is what an ATTEMPTED DEFLECTION from the MASSIVE CURB STOMPING BV just got looks like!!

Funny as **** watching the ASSHOLE PRICK try to squirm out of the FACT that TRUMP'S CONVICTION WILL BE OVERTURNED ON MULTIPLE ERRORS DURING TRIAL!! INCLUDING the one where NO CAMPAIGN FINANCE VIOLATIONS WAS EVER PROVEN TO HAVE OCCURRED!! Which IS a necessary element of "proving" that 34 BOOKKEEPING ERRORS WERE A "felony"!!

Sucks huh, ASSHOLE SUCKER??

Oh, and ASSHOLE SUCKER, you can READ what one of your side's rags had to say about the FACT THAT WITNESS TESTIMONY WAS EITHER RESTRICTED OR DENIED!! ESPECIALLY on ELECTION FINANCE LAWS!!

Judge limits scope of testimony from Trump's planned expert witness - Live Updates - POLITICO

 

*Beekeeper » 13 Jan 2025, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 8:12 am

^^^ AND THIS is what an ATTEMPTED DEFLECTION from the MASSIVE CURB STOMPING BV just got looks like!!

Funny as **** watching the ASSHOLE PRICK try to squirm out of the FACT that TRUMP'S CONVICTION WILL BE OVERTURNED ON MULTIPLE ERRORS DURING TRIAL!! INCLUDING the one where NO CAMPAIGN FINANCE VIOLATIONS WAS EVER PROVEN TO HAVE OCCURRED!! Which IS a necessary element of "proving" that 34 BOOKKEEPING ERRORS WERE A "felony"!!

Sucks huh, ASSHOLE SUCKER??

Oh, and ASSHOLE SUCKER, you can READ what one of your side's rags had to say about the FACT THAT WITNESS TESTIMONY WAS EITHER RESTRICTED OR DENIED!! ESPECIALLY on ELECTION FINANCE LAWS!!

Judge limits scope of testimony from Trump's planned expert witness - Live Updates - POLITICO

Funny as **** watching the ASSHOLE PRICK try to squirm out of the FACT that TRUMP'S CONVICTION WILL BE OVERTURNED

This is how **** stupid you are, BGroomer.

NO CAMPAIGN FINANCE VIOLATIONS WAS EVER PROVEN TO HAVE OCCURRED!! 

Item 30.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/michael-cohen-pleads-guilty-manhattan-federal-court-eight-counts-including-criminal-tax&ved=2ahUKEwjwntSj5vKKAxV9AHkGHaYkHjEQFnoECBoQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3NZH_DUq0NBwb4q-ou0krC

THAT WITNESS TESTIMONY WAS EITHER RESTRICTED OR DENIED

you can read why the witness in question was denied.

Not that you will understand it.

BV **** getting his *** kicked once again

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2025, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 8:31 am

This is how **** stupid you are, BGroomer.

Item 30.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/michael-cohen-pleads-guilty-manhattan-federal-court-eight-counts-including-criminal-tax&ved=2ahUKEwjwntSj5vKKAxV9AHkGHaYkHjEQFnoECBoQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3NZH_DUq0NBwb4q-ou0krC

you can read why the witness in question was denied.

Not that you will understand it.

https://i.postimg.cc/XqD4DDBg/pointing-laughing.jpg

COHEN"S CONVICTION isn't TRUMPS CRIME, DICKBREATH!! THAT IS COHEN who LIED LIKE A **** RUG AND WAS FOUND GUILTY OF HIS OWN CRIMINAL ACTS!! OF WHICH THERE WAS MANY!! AND THAT DOES NOT PROVE THAT TRUMP COMMITTED ANY CRIME REGARDING CAMPAIGN FINANCE VIOLATIONS!!

HOW **** STUPID DID YOU GET OVER THE WEEKEND, ASSHOLE SUCKER???

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2025, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 8:31 am

This is how **** stupid you are, BGroomer.

Item 30.

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&opi=89978449&url=https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/michael-cohen-pleads-guilty-manhattan-federal-court-eight-counts-including-criminal-tax&ved=2ahUKEwjwntSj5vKKAxV9AHkGHaYkHjEQFnoECBoQAQ&usg=AOvVaw3NZH_DUq0NBwb4q-ou0krC

you can read why the witness in question was denied.

Not that you will understand it.

OH, and ***-SUCKY, here is the RULING on MORE OF THE WHY Merchan wasn't going to allow TESTIMONY of the Campaign Finance laws....


But the judge ruled this morning that allowing Smith to testify expansively on that topic would supplant the judge's role to determine what the law is.


IN OTHER WORDS, the ARROGANCE ASSHOLE CALLED "Judge Merchan" couldn't further TWIST THE LAWS INTO A PRETZEL IN ORDER TO GET THE PRE-ORDAINED CONVICTION he personally wanted!!

AND THAT is a complete violation of Trump's CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO AN IMPARTIAL JUDGE AND JURY!!
 

*Beekeeper » 13 Jan 2025, 11:44 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 11:44 am

OH, and ***-SUCKY, here is the RULING on MORE OF THE WHY Merchan wasn't going to allow TESTIMONY of the Campaign Finance laws....

But the judge ruled this morning that allowing Smith to testify expansively on that topic would supplant the judge's role to determine what the law is.

IN OTHER WORDS, the ARROGANCE ASSHOLE CALLED "Judge Merchan" couldn't further TWIST THE LAWS INTO A PRETZEL IN ORDER TO GET THE PRE-ORDAINED CONVICTION he personally wanted!!

AND THAT is a complete violation of Trump's CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT TO AN IMPARTIAL JUDGE AND JURY!!

Because, as you've been told before, the judge is the law in his/her courtroom.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2025, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 11:56 am

Because, as you've been told before, the judge is the law in his/her courtroom.

Doesn’t matter any more.  In 7 days and a wake up Trump will be 47.

*Huey » 13 Jan 2025, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 12:08 pm

Doesn’t matter any more.  In 7 days and a wake up Trump will be 47.

You have no idea what does, or does not, matter..

It's why you watch The Five. 
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2025, 12:12 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 12:12 pm

You have no idea what does, or does not, matter..

It's why you watch The Five.

Umm, I know that in seven days and a wake up Trump will be 47.  All the lawfare you creamed yourself over failed.  And I love it.  I will rub that on your face as long as you attack trump and the fight.

*Huey » 13 Jan 2025, 12:16 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 12:16 pm

Umm, I know that in seven days and a wake up Trump will be 47.  All the lawfare you creamed yourself over failed.  And I love it.  I will rub that on your face as long as you attack trump and the fight.

over failed.

He lost them all.

And I love it. I will rub that on your face as long as you attack trump and the fight.

You don't like anyone criticizing Trumpybear?

Or "the fight"?

 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2025, 12:18 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 12:18 pm

He lost them all.

You don't like anyone criticizing Trumpybear?

Or "the fight"?

LMAO!  You are not a very person.  The purpose of the lawfare, dum dum, was to prevent him from ever holding office again.  As I said, and you clearly quoted, it failed.    

He didn’t lose the  documents case.  .  
 

*Huey » 13 Jan 2025, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 12:21 pm

LMAO!  You are not a very person.  The purpose of the lawfare, dum dum, was to prevent him from ever holding office again.  As I said, and you clearly quoted, it failed.    

He didn’t lose the  documents case.  .

LMAO!  You are not a very person.  The purpose of the lawfare, dum dum, 

No, sockpuppet...

These cases were No Contest.

He didn’t lose the  documents case.

only because the repeatedly corrected Judge Aileen declared the sheriff void.

We'll see if it survives appeal.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2025, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 12:34 pm

No, sockpuppet...

These cases were No Contest.

only because the repeatedly corrected Judge Aileen declared the sheriff void.

We'll see if it survives appeal.

Cut the ****, Legacy.  The purpose of those cases, and even you stated it, was to keep Trump out of elected office.  They were **** to begin.  

And you are still not suing sockpuppet correctly.  I think it is kind of funny, Huckleberry.

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2025, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 7:46 am

In spite of the last minute call to his flunky on the bench...

The proceedings are set to begin at 9:30 a.m. Though the president-elect is expected to avoid jail time, his sentencing on 34 counts will formalize his status as a felon and make him the first to carry that distinction into the White House.

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/01/10 ... sentencing

"But the Narod!.....(....sniff....)"....snot bubble bursts.

**** you ya *** traitor bastard.

*Huey » 13 Jan 2025, 12:41 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 12:41 pm

Cut the ****, Legacy.  The purpose of those cases, and even you stated it, was to keep Trump out of elected office.  They were **** to begin.  

And you are still not suing sockpuppet correctly.  I think it is kind of funny, Huckleberry.

Tiny,

10,400 minutes of Distilled FOXaganda every year has a corrosive effect on Reason. You've repeatedly confirmed that you understand neither the particulars or the law.

You must stop asserting what is.

You have no idea.