Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2025, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 1:09 pm

Tiny,

10,400 minutes of Distilled FOXaganda every year has a corrosive effect on Reason. You've repeatedly confirmed that you understand neither the particulars or the law.

You must stop asserting what is.

You have no idea.

Don’t worry, I am digging up your words as we speak.  Before I do, to clarify, your stand is that these lawsuits where brought to make sure Trump never held office again.  Correct?

*Huey » 13 Jan 2025, 1:11 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 1:11 pm

Don’t worry, I am digging up your words as we speak.  Before I do, to clarify, your stand is that these lawsuits where brought to make sure Trump never held office again.  Correct?

Before I do, to clarify, your stand is that these lawsuits where brought to make sure Trump never held office again. Correct?

Clearly not, you tedious **** idiot.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2025, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 1:16 pm

Clearly not, you tedious **** idiot.

Then don't an I accept your surrender.
 

Blackvegetable » Today, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:09 pm

Tiny,

10,400 minutes of Distilled FOXaganda every year has a corrosive effect on Reason. You've repeatedly confirmed that you understand neither the particulars or the law.

You must stop asserting what is.

You have no idea.

Stop lying ya traitor *** bastard.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2025, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 12:34 pm

*Huey » 13 Jan 2025, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 12:21 pm

LMAO!  You are not a very person.  The purpose of the lawfare, dum dum, was to prevent him from ever holding office again.  As I said, and you clearly quoted, it failed.    

He didn’t lose the  documents case.  .

LMAO!  You are not a very person.  The purpose of the lawfare, dum dum, 

No, sockpuppet...

These cases were No Contest.

He didn’t lose the  documents case.

only because the repeatedly corrected Judge Aileen declared the sheriff void.

We'll see if it survives appeal.

 

Sure BV, no law fare:

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/202 ... tm-vpx.cnn

In Letitia James own words while running for office.  Show her the man, she will show your  the crime.

You can't attack the source on this on.
 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2025, 11:56 am » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 11:56 am

Because, as you've been told before, the judge is the law in his/her courtroom.

No, the JUDGE is not "the law in his/her courtroom" when his version of the law is WRONG!!

WHY THE **** do you think that APPEALS ARE WON IN HIGHER COURTS EVERY DAMN DAY, ASSHOLE??

Oh, that's right, YOU DON'T KNOW JACK **** OR HIS LITTLE BROTHER BULL ****!!

 

*Huey » 13 Jan 2025, 4:10 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 4:10 pm

Sure BV, no law fare:

https://www.cnn.com/videos/politics/202 ... tm-vpx.cnn

In Letitia James own words while running for office.  Show her the man, she will show your  the crime.

You can't attack the source on this on.

Groooooaaan.

He was indicted by grand juries, found liable and guilty by juries while represented by the best his credit could buy.

The only judge before whom he found favor has been reversed once, and used an entirely novel argument to stall the case before her.

 

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2025, 4:30 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 4:30 pm

Groooooaaan.

He was indicted by grand juries, found liable and guilty by juries while represented by the best his credit could buy.

The only judge before whom he found favor has been reversed once, and used an entirely novel argument to stall the case before her.

Yeah....Huckleberry, lets see how the appeals process goes, if needed.  The law fare lied about failed.  Say hi to 47!



This is gonna be a rough 4 years for you.  I will dig up as many of your old posts as possible to show what an ignorant rube you are.  It is gonna be fun.  Really fun.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2025, 4:30 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 4:30 pm

Groooooaaan.

He was indicted by grand juries, found liable and guilty by juries while represented by the best his credit could buy.

The only judge before whom he found favor has been reversed once, and used an entirely novel argument to stall the case before her.

Hey ****, GRAND JURIES DO NOT DETERMINE GUILT OR INNOCENCE!!

PERIOD!!!

Next CURB STOMPING ON IT'S WAY!!

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2025, 4:30 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 4:30 pm

Groooooaaan.

He was indicted by grand juries, found liable and guilty by juries while represented by the best his credit could buy.

The only judge before whom he found favor has been reversed once, and used an entirely novel argument to stall the case before her.

PS.  Did I mention ham sandwiches and indictments....nevermnd. I did the other day.

How is that GA case going?  Not to well.

Blackvegetable » 51 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

51 minutes ago

Groooooaaan.

He was indicted by grand juries, found liable and guilty by juries while represented by the best his credit could buy.

The only judge before whom he found favor has been reversed once, and used an entirely novel argument to stall the case before her.

Indeed, all by lying Democrat scum just like you! But don't worry, you traitors got 4 years to run and hide like the spineless little **** you are!

Trump's coming for you bitches!
 

*Huey » 13 Jan 2025, 4:39 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 4:39 pm

PS.  Did I mention ham sandwiches and indictments....nevermnd. I did the other day.

How is that GA case going?  Not to well.

Are you tak8ng the stand that all indicted people are victims?

What if it's different prosecutors but the same ham sandwich

**** idiot.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2025, 6:14 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 6:14 pm

Are you tak8ng the stand that all indicted people are victims?

What if it's different prosecutors but the same ham sandwich

**** idiot.

I'm laughing at you thinking a grand jury indictment indicates guile.  You are one silly, lil man, Huckleberry.

Just curious Capt Stuben, where did you come up with that 5"6" crap?  You proved your dad right.  You ae one dishonest loser.

Good night, Huckleberry, I hope you live thru the next four years.  You past words will continually come up.  No law fare? THat was the sign of a Rube.

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2025, 6:14 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 6:14 pm

Are you tak8ng the stand that all indicted people are victims?

What if it's different prosecutors but the same ham sandwich

**** idiot.

Trump is NOT a felon

Blackvegetable » 13 Jan 2025, 6:14 pm » wrote: ↑

13 Jan 2025, 6:14 pm

Are you tak8ng the stand that all indicted people are victims?

What if it's different prosecutors but the same ham sandwich

**** idiot.

Every other ham sandwich has a separate slices of ham. The whole is equal to total sum of its existing parts here now. When you separates parts of the parts you get further away from understanding the actual whole [process of evolving in plain sight mentally.

Doing the divide every generation gap after dividing the ancestral lineages first, the exponential effect ends up affecting everything living one way or another.