Liberal Forum

ROG62 » 10 Jan 2025, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 10:36 am

*GHETTO BLASTER+26 minutes ago*Huey+29 minutes ago

Are you morons calling Steve Bannon a liar?

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2025, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 10:47 am

Are you morons calling Steve Bannon a liar?

meaningless. No teeth.

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2025, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 10:44 am

A march of 1000 miles begins with a single stagger.

 

The march is about over.  You didn't fare so well.  

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2025, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 8:08 am

He'll be FOTUS.

merchan us a **** joke... karma is coming for him

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2025, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 10:44 am

He IS a felon...

You got your victory!

And we have our president 
 

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2025, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 10:44 am

He IS a felon...

And......You know where he will be Jan 20th.  

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2025, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 10:12 am

Elon spent massive sums trolling for morons...it bought him his seat at the table.

I see your Musk and raise you a Soros.
 

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2025, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 8:39 am

Try this...

For what was Grifty convicted?

Easy.....

A BOOKKEEPING ENTRY that Bragg didn't like and contorted a "law" into a felony to escape the Statute of Limitations. And then used the "testimony" of a CONVICTED PERJUROR AND FELON to "prove' something that never existed. AND THE JUDGE then MASSIVELY ERRED with his "jury instructions" that they didn't have to have total agreement on some UNPROVEN UNDERLYING CRIME that "might have been committed". AND THAT is a complete disregard for the RULE OF LAW and the CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS of ANY defendant.

See, simple. Because you can go to the BANK with a MILLION TO ONE ODDS that THIS WILL BE OVERTURNED TOTALLY IN THE END!!

PERIOD!!!

There are WELL OVER A DOZEN ERRORS in this case that will REQUIRE an appeal to be heard and ruled in TRUMPS FAVOR. Just stick around for it and then you can get served up ONE MASSIVELY BIG PLATE OF CROW YOU'LL BE EATING WHOLE!!

Sucks, huh??

*Beekeeper » 10 Jan 2025, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 11:04 am

Easy.....

A BOOKKEEPING ENTRY that Bragg didn't like and contorted a "law" into a felony to escape the Statute of Limitations. And then used the "testimony" of a CONVICTED PERJUROR AND FELON to "prove' something that never existed. AND THE JUDGE then MASSIVELY ERRED with his "jury instructions" that they didn't have to have total agreement on some UNPROVEN UNDERLYING CRIME that "might have been committed". AND THAT is a complete disregard for the RULE OF LAW and the CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS of ANY defendant.

See, simple. Because you can go to the BANK with a MILLION TO ONE ODDS that THIS WILL BE OVERTURNED TOTALLY IN THE END!!

PERIOD!!!

There are WELL OVER A DOZEN ERRORS in this case that will REQUIRE an appeal to be heard and ruled in TRUMPS FAVOR. Just stick around for it and then you can get served up ONE MASSIVELY BIG PLATE OF CROW YOU'LL BE EATING WHOLE!!

Sucks, huh??

He'll never admit it.  He still can't admit he was wrong about Russia Russia Trump.  

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2025, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 10:47 am

Are you morons calling Steve Bannon a liar?      

Richard....you're not taking your very humiliating defeat very well......     
At this point all we can ask is that you  choose a nice wide tree way out in the country to act as a back stop / splatter shield before you pull the trigger....   

https://x.com/TheAlexStrenger/status/18 ... 1433178234
 
 

*Huey » 10 Jan 2025, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 11:07 am

He'll never admit it.  He still can't admit he was wrong about Russia Russia Trump.

He doesn't have to "admit it". But the APPELLATE COURTS WILL and that's the one that actually counts.

He's going to eat a TON OF PLATES OF CROW on this "braggadociousness" he exhibits on an hourly basis.
 

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2025, 7:46 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 7:46 am

In spite of the last minute call to his flunky on the bench...

The proceedings are set to begin at 9:30 a.m. Though the president-elect is expected to avoid jail time, his sentencing on 34 counts will formalize his status as a felon and make him the first to carry that distinction into the White House.

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/01/10 ... sentencing

"But the Narod!.....(....sniff....)"....snot bubble bursts.

This will not tarnish the president (a temporary position) nearly as much as the DOJ for encouraging this fakery.
Pretty much all of the accusations about left-leaning courts and media are proven before our eyes.
Hint: the last election is a big tell.

ps
One REAL felony would have been better. Sprinkles of fakes just didn't cut it.   

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2025, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 10:44 am

He IS a felon...

For now.

But let's face it the entire reason for this case (and all the others for that matter) was to keep Trump out of the White House. 

It failed

You failed.

Better luck next time, loser.

**chuckle**
 
 

Stay tuned for "Lawfare Part 2"!

I suspect in part 2, someone actually goes to jail.

Fuelman » 10 Jan 2025, 11:23 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 11:23 am

Stay tuned for "Lawfare Part 2"!

I suspect in part 2, someone actually goes to jail.

Like when TRUMP orders a RAID on Biden's "homes" for CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS that he STOLE from the WHITE HOUSE on departing??

Yeah, I can see that happening. Only THIS time, Biden won't get off with the "he's senile old man" crap!!

 

*Beekeeper » 10 Jan 2025, 11:27 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 11:27 am

Like when TRUMP orders a RAID on Biden's "homes" for CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS that he STOLE from the WHITE HOUSE on departing??

Yeah, I can see that happening. Only THIS time, Biden won't get off with the "he's senile old man" crap!!

I believe Pam Bondi will be taking a hard look at the connection between these Trump cases and the DOJ/Whitehouse.
 

" I wanna be a gangsta "

*Huey » 10 Jan 2025, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 10:50 am

The march is about over.  You didn't fare so well.

The landscape isn't moving....you are.

Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2025, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 11:38 am

The landscape isn't moving....you are.

Actually, 312 will be in office in 10 days.  

*Huey » 10 Jan 2025, 11:41 am » wrote: ↑

10 Jan 2025, 11:41 am

Actually, 312 will be in office in 10 days.

And you'll be running then, too.