Is that how you cope with your self debasement?Cedar » 10 Jan 2025, 11:20 am » wrote: ↑ For now.
But let's face it the entire reason for this case (and all the others for that matter) was to keep Trump out of the White House.
It failed
You failed.
Better luck next time, loser.
**chuckle**
It's why you're always running.*Huey » 10 Jan 2025, 12:04 pm » wrote: ↑ I am not running from anything. When make a point or take a stand, elet me. I'll be right here.
Again?
Try this...
For what was Grifty convicted?
No need to cope.
I didn't ask that...
every March only last 31 days a year. Every March is 2/3rd of the planet changing opposite seasons. in either winter to spring or summer to fall same rotations of the planet.Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2025, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑ A march of 1000 miles begins with a single stagger.
*Huey » 10 Jan 2025, 12:31 pm » wrote: ↑ Well, it is the answer you got and shows I know what he was convicted for. And, beekeeper summed it nicely:
viewtopic.php?p=2681909#p2681909
Surely why he spent so much money trying to stop it.Cedar » 10 Jan 2025, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑ No need to cope.
You get to stroke yourself for a few months calling your President a felon, until the conviction is overturned. The fantasy is usually better than the ****, this seems almost impotent. "We got him this time" But what did you actually get, a new President?![]()
Any sane person would defend themselves.Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2025, 12:34 pm » wrote: ↑ Surely why he spent so much money trying to stop it.
He had that opportunity.Cedar » 10 Jan 2025, 12:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Any sane person would defend themselves.
If it makes you feel any worse, these fraudulent trials probably put Trump back in the White House.
**chuckle**
Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2025, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑ it shows you running from answering honestly.
Had you done so, the debate would have been over.
Yup, he was. Shrug.Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2025, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑ He had that opportunity.
He was convicted.
On all counts, in little more time than it took to read them.
Debating possibilities for tomorrow 24/7 isn't discussing self evident results evolving in plain sight each rotation achieved so far.Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2025, 12:33 pm » wrote: ↑ it shows you running from answering honestly.
Had you done so, the debate would have been over.
When all is said and done, you'll find yourself on the wrong side of history again.Blackvegetable » 10 Jan 2025, 12:39 pm » wrote: ↑ He had that opportunity.
He was convicted.
On all counts, in little more time than it took to read them.