Go **** yourself with a wood chipper.
Censorship, loser.
the day your brain engages again is closer than you believe possible.
Because you are an equal role model participating in distracting every brain from recognizing why they exist mutually evolving when timed apart now as specifically genetically here so far.Blackvegetable » 14 Jan 2025, 7:54 am » wrote: ↑ :rofl:
Your stupid is all over this place...
Entirely unmolested.
Yes yes, fruity. Censorship is a big laugh - and anyone who opposes it is "stupid."Blackvegetable » 14 Jan 2025, 7:54 am » wrote: ↑![]()
Your stupid is all over this place...
Entirely unmolested.
You haven't been censored, **** idiot.Cannonpointer » 14 Jan 2025, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑ Yes yes, fruity. Censorship is a big laugh - and anyone who opposes it is "stupid."
You long ago lost the purse that held your tiny berries.
Lying queer.
Queer lost a bet - STILL sniveling.
Oh, you have a NARRATIVE of persecution...Cannonpointer » 14 Jan 2025, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑ Lying queer.
Of course I was censored - repeatedly. Any post I ever made outside this sewer was taken down as "anti-science" or "misinformation."
Queer lost a bet - STILL sniveling.
You said persecution, weakling. I said censorship.Blackvegetable » 14 Jan 2025, 9:26 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, you have a NARRATIVE of persecution...
You improvised a bit on the conditions, Vic
I understand how censorship works blocking almost all attempts of instinctive honesty in any medium transferring information between ancestries living by a code of honoring hypothetical tomorrows that there never has been a genetic tomorrow by clock and calendar facts journaling human behavior every generation gap lived so far.Cannonpointer » 14 Jan 2025, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑ Yes yes, fruity. Censorship is a big laugh - and anyone who opposes it is "stupid."
You long ago lost the purse that held your tiny berries.
You girls created the conditions, piss-poor loser.
Lying cowardly ****..Cannonpointer » 14 Jan 2025, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑ You girls created the conditions, piss-poor loser.
I followed them to a T.
You lose badly - which is odd. As much as you do it, one might expect you to get better at it.
HAHAHA....
Sniveling whiny bitch.
How many soks are you currently employing to hand out negative rep points?Cannonpointer » 14 Jan 2025, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑ You said persecution, weakling. I said censorship.
Censorship and persecution are different things. Trying to shift the narrative because you know your position is laughable won't slide here, fruitcake.
You are a loud member of team censorship. You suck.
But what is he lying about and the rest is accurate?
Just your mom, I believe. But any and all can be pressed into service.Blackvegetable » 14 Jan 2025, 2:36 pm » wrote: ↑ How many soks are you currently employing to hand out negative rep points?