Liberal Forum

Skans » 14 Jan 2025, 4:59 pm » wrote: ↑

14 Jan 2025, 4:59 pm

Barry is going without her.  Maybe he'll be taking the gay Uber ......if only he can find where he left that Cocaine.

In the whitehouse....  
 

nefarious101 » 15 Jan 2025, 12:47 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jan 2025, 12:47 pm

She can't show up....when you gets around Trump she gets a "Boner"

Its ok if Michelle Obama disagrees with Trump and does not want to attend. I would think that you would want the spotlight on Trump and not someone in the audience.

impartialobserver » 15 Jan 2025, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jan 2025, 4:22 pm

Its ok if Michelle Obama disagrees with Trump and does not want to attend. I would think that you would want the spotlight on Trump and not someone in the audience.

LBJ was sworn in with just a few witnesses. Who gives a **** who is there or not?
Spotlight or not, the point is taking the oath of office, is it not?

Then the world can move on from this ****.   

impartialobserver » 15 Jan 2025, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jan 2025, 4:22 pm

Its ok if Michelle Obama disagrees with Trump and does not want to attend. I would think that you would want the spotlight on Trump and not someone in the audience.

It would be very refreshing to see you apply your belief system and your standards evenly if the roles were reversed. 
If Mikey was to be sworn in and Trump refused to attend you would be calling him a racist or at least a Sore Loser.
You know it and  I know it.

 
 

tRump didn’t attend bidens

Who gives a ****?

I would skip it if I were tRump

A body double or a hologram

If he does go

Once he is sworn in, he should start ducking

he needs to worry about the people that put him in 
 

Mrkelly » 15 Jan 2025, 6:02 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jan 2025, 6:02 pm

tRump didn’t attend bidens

Who gives a ****?

I would skip it if I were tRump

A body double or a hologram

If he does go

Once he is sworn in, he should start ducking

he needs to worry about the people that put him in

Yeah I would skip the inauguration of a member of my own race without any worries of being called a racist by the [[[JWO]]] MSM.....jeezus dude...please get a clue....  

*GHETTOBLASTER » 15 Jan 2025, 5:04 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jan 2025, 5:04 pm

It would be very refreshing to see you apply your belief system and your standards evenly if the roles were reversed. 
If Mikey was to be sworn in and Trump refused to attend you would be calling him a racist or at least a Sore Loser.
You know it and  I know it.

Well then it should be easy to find where I have called Trump a racist. If Michelle Obama was being sworn in as President and Trump did not attend... pretty sure that life goes on. He would be free to attend or not. 

DeezerShoove » 15 Jan 2025, 4:28 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jan 2025, 4:28 pm

LBJ was sworn in with just a few witnesses. Who gives a **** who is there or not?
Spotlight or not, the point is taking the oath of office, is it not?

Then the world can move on from this ****. 

Folks are always trying to find a way to stir the pot. John Doe says X... Well then that you have something against X. Such is the nature of today's political circus. I could not care less who attends. 

impartialobserver » 16 Jan 2025, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 12:49 pm

Folks are always trying to find a way to stir the pot. John Doe says X... Well then that you have something against X. Such is the nature of today's political circus. I could not care less who attends.

You're under the assumption there is nothing fundamentally wrong with a Democrat.   

RebelGator » 16 Jan 2025, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 1:13 pm

You're under the assumption there is nothing fundamentally wrong with a Democrat. 

Back to the topic... does it truly matter if she attends or not?  Will the process cease because she is not there? 

It’s gonna be too **** cold for her

impartialobserver » 16 Jan 2025, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 1:16 pm

Back to the topic... does it truly matter if she attends or not?  Will the process cease because she is not there?

Nah, it do't matter.  Sometime after 1100 Trump will be 47 whether she is there or not.  Trump skipped Biden's inauguration.  

*Huey » 16 Jan 2025, 1:20 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 1:20 pm

Nah, it do't matter.  Sometime after 1100 Trump will be 47 whether she is there or not.  Trump skipped Biden's inauguration.

Exactly. So in short.. contrived drama. 

Trump better have better security than he did from the first assassination attempt on him. He will be in the open.

impartialobserver » 16 Jan 2025, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 1:25 pm

Exactly. So in short.. contrived drama.

Plus, and I am no fan of the Obamas, if I was in Hawaii there is no way I would want to willing go to DC where it is projected to be the coldest inauguration in 40 years.

*Huey » 16 Jan 2025, 1:29 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 1:29 pm

Plus, and I am no fan of the Obamas, if I was in Hawaii there is no way I would want to willing go to DC where it is projected to be the coldest inauguration in 40 years.

to add on that.. dealing with all of those people and the traffic. No wonder that they would pass. Well the Obamas are the past anyway. 

impartialobserver » 16 Jan 2025, 12:46 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 12:46 pm

Well then it should be easy to find where I have called Trump a racist.

So now your deflection is to say that it should be easy to find a case of Trump refusing to attend a Black politician's inauguration...............  .
 

impartialobserver » Yesterday, 4:22 pm » wrote: ↑

Yesterday, 4:22 pm

Its ok if Michelle Obama disagrees with Trump and does not want to attend. I would think that you would want the spotlight on Trump and not someone in the audience.

Who gives a **** if she is there?

murdock » 16 Jan 2025, 3:16 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 3:16 pm

Who gives a **** if she is there?

wow, your mind and my brain can agree on something about a single event in a series parallel existence in the middle of 8.2 billion reproduced humans occupying time today.