Oh, good. We DO get to go a little more granular, then.Skans » 15 Jan 2025, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑ No. I was merely explaining the primary reason for Russia's current military expenditures. As opposed to what was being insinuated, i.e. that America is a country of Squishes that are scared to spend money in its military. Well, some of America are squishes, I can't deny that - hopefully Trump's administration deletes them from our military.
News flash, Skippy. Your claims about the efficacy of the Glorious Airfarce of Eunuchraine is at odds with the facts on the ground.ConservativeWave » 15 Jan 2025, 8:03 am » wrote: ↑ YOU might want to consider the following:
1) Russia was supposed to have air defense systems that rival ours to (the S300 & S400)... BUT... Ukraine and Israel have been blowing them up REGULARLY... with Israel destroying so many of them in Iran recently, that it's pretty much a well known fact that Iran CAN NOT protect itself from Israeli attacks any longer..and are just WAITING for their Nuclear sites to be destroyed... which is coming !!
2) Russia was supposed to have some of the best Fighter Jets in the world... until Ukraine has taken so many of them out, that most of whats left have been moved WELL behind the lines, and out of harms way... BUT, Ukraine is STILL destroying them !

Skans 'blahing' again without any grasp of the issue at hand.Cannonpointer » 15 Jan 2025, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, good. We DO get to go a little more granular, then.
Either you are incorrect on what was being insinuated, or the person making that insinuation is an idiot. I find it LAUGHABLE that anyone would suggest the US is bashful when it comes to enriching the parasitic MIC. I suspect that it is you who is incorrect about the insinuation.
What is being alluded to - and what I will now clarify, bringing it out of the background and into the foreground so that it become a charge and not an insinuation - is that the U.S. MIC has only one purpose, and that is to turn a profit. The defense of this nation is entirely outside of its core mission.
The RUSSIAN MIC belongs to the state. It does not exist to turn a profit, but to defend the nation. AS A RESULT OF THESE FACTS, Russia's production capacities are directed by the needs of the state. AS ANOTHER RESULT OF THESE FACTS, The US production capacities - and those of its NATO vassals - are directed by the needs of the parasitic corporations determining what materials are ordered and what production capacities are maintained through THEIR vassals in congress.
This puts the NATO nations at a major disadvantage - being their respective MICs' bitches. After the NATO sissies emptied the shelves of their artillery, they could not produce enough, quickly enough, to give Ukraine what it needed on its long front in the current bitch-slapping it is undergoing.
And be clear what I mean by "NATO sissies." I mean mother **** who wear dresses, deciding how things ought to be. You back em. I don't.
LOL.Cannonpointer » 15 Jan 2025, 11:33 am » wrote: ↑ News flash, Skippy. Your claims about the efficacy of the Glorious Airfarce of Eunuchraine is at odds with the facts on the ground.
Zelensky just got busted out for mass-transfers of the useless, failing airmen in his air farce to the INFANTRY, to plug holes from desertions, defections, and deletions (KIAs).
And y'know how little voldemort always runs to the camera and never lets anyone else get in front of it? Well, well - that isn't happening today. No sir. TODAY, he has ordered his subordinates to explain it away. He is suddenly camera shy.
The soldiers of an air farce that is accomplishing these great feats that men in dresses have convinced you of does not have to worry about being gutted of personnel to plug holes in the infantry, you dufus.
https://newsukraine.rbc.ua/news/zelensk ... 85830.html
Lol. A military that is dominating the skies doesn't cannibalize its air farce. But conwave DOES dominate his diaper.
Cannonpointer » 15 Jan 2025, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑ Russia's arms sales are to nations whose armies have not left their own borders in a hundred years, for the purpose of DEFENDING against countries whose armies have not been WITHIN their borders for a hundred years.
I call that a distinction that makes a difference.
Now we're down to military surplus for consumer use, FFS? Isn't that just a TAD off the topic?DeezerShoove » 15 Jan 2025, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑ Lots of Russian and Chinese ammo here in the US.
I even have a Russian monocular (decent quality) I paid $15 for...
Whores are whores.
Cannonpointer » 15 Jan 2025, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑ Now we're down to military surplus for consumer use, FFS? Isn't that just a TAD off the topic?
Who ate they selling MISSILES to? Tanks?
lolDeezerShoove » 15 Jan 2025, 12:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Anybody that will buy them.
Final answer.
.
Did I get it?
WORD.Cannonpointer » 15 Jan 2025, 11:45 am » wrote: ↑ Lol. A military that is dominating the skies doesn't cannibalize its air farce. But conwave DOES dominate his diaper.

What makes that statistically true while complete inaccurate for lack of complete explanation how that fact was created in translations of daily events?Sumela » 14 Jan 2025, 12:58 pm » wrote: ↑ And yet NATO produces more LGBTQ troops than the whole world combined.![]()
EU economy is in tatters...and the Elites wanna quadruple ""defense"" spending.![]()
https://x.com/i/status/1878857918722011209
It's like he shares a diaper with nefcuck.Sumela » 15 Jan 2025, 12:08 pm » wrote: ↑ WORD.
Remember when LOON ConWave went through his various cucked phases....
All fed to him by Biden Regime....and he happily gulped and spewed.
The lil guy is fully dedicated to FAKE NEWS. That kind of loyalty is really gay,
"Putin said Kiev would fall in 3 days"
"Russia will run out of ammo within 3-6 months"
"Russia is out of missiles"
"Putin will soon be overthrown"
"Russia nearing collapse and a violent revolution"
"Russia is down to fighting with shovels"
"Russia is cannibalizing washing machines for parts"
.....poor lil guy is wearing himself out![]()
Damn, that poor poor nurse.


HA!! I'm sure MOST of what they build Russia NEEDS THEMSELVES !! ...anyway, WHO would buy Russian arms NOW? After the colossal FAILURE that most have been against UKRAINE?Cannonpointer » 15 Jan 2025, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑ Russia's arms sales are to nations whose armies have not left their own borders in a hundred years, for the purpose of DEFENDING against countries whose armies have not been WITHIN their borders for a hundred years.
I call that a distinction that makes a difference.
Fruit, Russia got rid of its soviet era weapons. Their shelves are now stocked with the new stuff - including their hypersonic missiles.ConservativeWave » 15 Jan 2025, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑ HA!! I'm sure MOST of what they build Russia NEEDS THEMSELVES !! ...anyway, WHO would buy Russian arms NOW? After the colossal FAILURE that most have been against UKRAINE?
I think it's a distinction that CAN'T make a difference... because it's NOT APPLICABLE !!
Where did that mouthy little *** slink off to?Cannonpointer » 14 Jan 2025, 10:21 pm » wrote: ↑Are you retarded?RebelGator » 14 Jan 2025, 10:15 pm » wrote: ↑ No, you're the one that's stupid....if you're going to quote me, respond with something that addresses what I posted......not some off the wall **** that's not even pertinent.
You said, and I COPY PASTE: "Tell Lord Bebo that the total dollar value of boats in our coastal city's marinas would dwarf Pootie's GDP...."
So, again, you weak-minded little queer, EXPLAIN HOW THIS WEAK COUNTRY HAS HELD OFF FORTY NATIONS AND SANCTIONS FOR THREE YEARS, ALL WHILE GAINING GROUND.
Go, fruity. GO!