Blackvegetable » Today, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑ I won't humiliate you and your source by asking you to name the Deficit Champ.
That would be inhumane.
Let me instead ask you to name the most fiscally responsible POTUS for whom you have voted......
****** bled what?
"Censorship!"
https://youtu.be/0ZATF7fIa6o?si=hdj0TEt30C_T96YP
****** thinks name calling justifies censorship?
Would that be around 2009?Fuelman » 15 Jan 2025, 9:47 am » wrote: ↑ I was "worried" when the Federal Debt was $ 8-10 trillion.
It's a number to look at and just shake your head. It's also has become quite entertaining to watch the best and brightest run this **** into the ground!
Why do you label poster with calumnies?Cannonpointer » 15 Jan 2025, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑ ****** thinks name calling justifies censorship?
Wowza.
No wonder you are roundly held in contempt, weakling.
The truth is never calumny, fruit.
No questions, dick sucker.Blackvegetable » 15 Jan 2025, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Did some forum, somewhere, not let you spew the unfiltered crap from the Covid Hearsay site?
Pull your little blue box full of ****?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom The OP is specifically talking about one President, Biden. Trump gets mentioned only because he held the record for the most federal debt accumulation and old Joe wouldn't let that stand!Blackvegetable » 15 Jan 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑ If not Fiscal Responsibility (or lack thereof) is not the point of the OP, what is?
Do you understand what a "structural deficit" is?Fuelman » 15 Jan 2025, 5:02 pm » wrote: ↑ The OP is specifically talking about one President, Biden. Trump gets mentioned only because he held the record for the most federal debt accumulation and old Joe wouldn't let that stand!
Given your profession, on this one issue, you should be able to say the number sucks.
You can stop right there.....Fuelman » 15 Jan 2025, 5:02 pm » wrote: ↑ The OP is specifically talking about one President, Biden. Trump gets mentioned only because he held the record for the most federal debt accumulation and old Joe wouldn't let that stand!
Given your profession, on this one issue, you should be able to say the number sucks.
You still can't give a comment on Joe's number but have plenty of excuses, telling!Blackvegetable » 15 Jan 2025, 7:41 pm » wrote: ↑ You can stop right there.....
If course it is about one man, Joe Biden.
Duh.
If it was about "deteriorating deficits", it would have to note Grifty bequeathed a far more deteriorating situation to Biden..
Because 1 data point, out of context, is a slogan.Fuelman » 16 Jan 2025, 10:01 am » wrote: ↑ You still can't give a comment on Joe's number but have plenty of excuses, telling!