Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 15 Jan 2025, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑

15 Jan 2025, 8:01 am

Post the popular vote total.

Why??????????????????? you wont accept the fact that Trump won the popular vote...

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2025, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 8:54 am

The evidence of whether the dem party is over. You don't seem to be reading his posts, either. 

The fact is, this thread is speculative. But the speculation is not out of nowhere. There is good cause for a suspicion that the democrat party could be seriously damaged by this failure.

No deck has ever been more stacked, from the billions worth of star power to the billions worth of lawfare to the billions worth of fake news to the well remembered threats of street violence and press-driven/cop-ignored city burnings to the fixed debates in which the blowjob queen had the questions in advance, the mods on her side, and a prompter in her ear.

Trump still winning against all of that election interference and corruption has absolutely endangered the future of the party. Speculating on what they will do and whether it will mitigate the damage is a perfectly reasonable conversation.

I know that is what he wants.  I am reading his posts.  I suggested he read the entire discussion I had because he would of learned that I don't believe the dem party is over.  I am about to show that to him.  So it is a waste of time to get into a manufactured argument with him because he is embarrassed to admit he his wrong.  

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2025, 8:55 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 8:55 am

You have demonstrated innumeracy over and over again, brown.

Post the numbers, then you can dance away the heartache....

What did the voters say to Kamala?

Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2025, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 8:49 am

America doesn't need a toothless sibling **** speaking for it.

Yup.

Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2025, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 8:59 am

Post the numbers, then you can dance away the heartache....

You know the fact that Trump beat Harris in the popular vote...

*Huey » 16 Jan 2025, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 1:05 pm

When Bush won in 04 it was the end of the Dems.

When Obama won it was the end of the Pubs.

When the GOP won the house in 2010 it was the end of the Dems.

In most elections of the last decade it was the end of the losing party.

 

@Blackvegetable  

Fuelman » 17 Jan 2025, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 8:50 am

At today's egg prices that sounds like a good deal for the people you barter with. Quite resourceful.

Indeed. I have a commodity that is currently overvalued - that does help with relationships.

Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2025, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 8:50 am

How do you know?

Post the thread title, followed by the vote totals.

You are stuck on this stupid idea that what the dems' voters did in the last election is some kind of evidence of what they will do in the next. That is not a well thought out position. People are a tad upset that a promised rout turned into a rout in the other direction. They trusted the corrupt, smirking machine holding all the cards to deliver - and it failed. NOW comes the reaction - not BEFORE the failure, you mediocre midwit. 
 
 

*Huey » 17 Jan 2025, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 8:59 am

I know that is what he wants.  I am reading his posts.  I suggested he read the entire discussion I had because he would of learned that I don't believe the dem party is over.  I am about to show that to him.  So it is a waste of time to get into a manufactured argument with him because he is embarrassed to admit he his wrong.

Tiny,

We KNOW many are your stands...

It is why I rarely ask you to do anything but confirm objective facts.
 

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2025, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 9:02 am

You are stuck on this stupid idea that what the dems' voters did in the last election is some kind of evidence of what they will do in the next. That is not a well thought out position. People are a tad upset that a promised rout turned into a rout in the other direction. They trusted the corrupt, smirking machine holding all the cards to deliver - and it failed. NOW comes the reaction - not BEFORE the failure, you mediocre midwit.

No.

You're wrong.

**** off now.
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2025, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 9:03 am

Tiny,

We KNOW many are your stands...

It is why I rarely ask you to do anything but confirm objective facts.

Not our problem you can't accept the FACT that Trump won the popular vote.

FJB » 17 Jan 2025, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 8:51 am

BV can't handle the fact that Trump won the popular vote and the electoral vote

No, it's worse than that. He thinks the number of democrat votes in the last election testifies to the party's relevance in the next. 

And it might. And it bloody well might not. A lot of those voters gave their votes grudgingly and unhappily in a "lesser evil" mindset. Now that they see the dems are incompetent to win with everything fixed in their direction, a goodly number of disaffected leftists could very well say enough is enough.The wedge issue of abortion is worthless now - it is a post roe world, so, "THEY'LL OVERTURN ROE" is not an effective cudgel. 

They used "TRUMP IS LITERALLY HITLER" three times - and it never worked. They only won once on that slogan, and even their voters know they cheated to do it. 

The dem party could fail - and when it does, the repuke party will not be far behind. 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2025, 9:03 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 9:03 am

Tiny,

We KNOW many are your stands...

It is why I rarely ask you to do anything but confirm objective facts.
 

 

Actually, you didn't know because you refused to read the entire conversation.  You got a well deserved curb stomping on this.

You have been running around demanding people post the numbers for weeks now.  When are you going to learn to do it yourself?  Next, I am NOT going to waste my time posting those numbers when it has nothing to do with my posts on the topic.  No, idiot, the dem party is not dying.  If you weren't so lazy you wouldn't have my time with this smack.  

You want to discuss those nubers, YOU Post them.  Then tell us how much they fell from 2020.  

Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2025, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 8:52 am

COLOSTOMY LEAK ON AISLE 5!

What a brilliant rejoinder to the first post which actually understood and responded thoughtfully to your feces, fruitcake.

This is what earns you all that respect.
 

*Huey » 17 Jan 2025, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 8:59 am

I know that is what he wants.  I am reading his posts.  I suggested he read the entire discussion I had because he would of learned that I don't believe the dem party is over.  I am about to show that to him.  So it is a waste of time to get into a manufactured argument with him because he is embarrassed to admit he his wrong.

Yeah, I realized that right after I responded to you. I DID read your posts, and I agree that nothing in those vote totals would confute a word you have uttered.

The truth is, they would not confute a word ANYONE has uttered, including those predicting dem-demolition. The number who voted dem when it appeared competent to beat LITERALLY HITLER CONVICTED RAPIST PUTIN PUPPET INSURRECTIONIST is not predictive of how many will vote for the party that got BEATEN by LITERALLY HITLER CONVICTED RAPIST PUTIN PUPPET INSURRECTIONIST. Especially with the advantages of rampant lawfare, a friendly press, billions in the war chest, fixed debates, the remembered threats of burning and looting assisted by authorities, and every star in hollywood endorsing their cackling blowjob queen. 

He is simply too stupid to understand that in the case of a failure of this magnitude, past is not necessarily prologue. The dem party didn't just lose. They lost to Trump, after staking everything they had - after going ALL IN. That will absolutely leave a mark. 

The fact that he is attacking someone who agrees with him that the dem party is safe going forward only shows how stupid he is - not how right you are. I'm hiding and watching, myself. Because I see the magnitude of the dems' failure, and I see the need for a serious re-ordering to forestall a major split in that party. 

Things are in come to Jesus mode at this moment. We shall see the response moving forward. I'm sure they have crisis management teams in play. That doesn't always guarantee success, though. There's many a slip 'twixt cup and lip. 
 
 

*Huey » 17 Jan 2025, 9:06 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 9:06 am

Actually, you didn't know because you refused to read the entire conversation.  You got a well deserved curb stomping on this.

You have been running around demanding people post the numbers for weeks now.  When are you going to learn to do it yourself?  Next, I am NOT going to waste my time posting those numbers when it has nothing to do with my posts on the topic.  No, idiot, the dem party is not dying.  If you weren't so lazy you wouldn't have my time with this smack.  

You want to discuss those nubers, YOU Post them.  Then tell us how much they fell from 2020.

I do know.

You ALWAYS take several stands on the same issue.

It is why, when confronted with your words, you are challenged to accept authorship.

I'm not that interested in sequential dismemberment....I'm aborting the entire premise informing the vast bulk of post election yapping.

Now you've been told.

post the number.
 

Cannonpointer » 17 Jan 2025, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 9:07 am

What a brilliant rejoinder to the first post which actually understood and responded thoughtfully to your feces, fruitcake.

This is what earns you all that respect.

You aren't close.

Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2025, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 9:14 am

You aren't close.

Yet you keep making stupid demands...

Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2025, 9:14 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 9:14 am

I do know.

You ALWAYS take several stands on the same issue.

It is why, when confronted with your words, you are challenged to accept authorship.

I'm not that interested in sequential dismemberment....I'm aborting the entire premise informing the vast bulk of post election yapping.

Now you've been told.

post the number.
 

 

That's the point.  I only took one stand.  Now you are lying because you **** up. No, I will not post any numbers.  I don't now, nor did I think after the election, the dem party is over.  Go argue with those that do.  

 

Blackvegetable » 17 Jan 2025, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑

17 Jan 2025, 8:59 am

Post the numbers, then you can dance away the heartache....

The number of people who voted dem to defeat LITERALLY HITLER CONVICTED RAPIST PUTIN PUPPET INSURRECTIONIST is not relevant to how many will defect now that the party proved itself ineffective against LITERALLY HITLER CONVICTED RAPIST PUTIN PUPPET INSURRECTIONIST.

Dumb ***.