Liberal Forum

Squatchman » 16 Jan 2025, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 8:50 am

  I already did once.
You were nowhere to be found.
Not surprising,you being a supporter of TFG.
Notorious cowards and bitches.

Now that's a **** LIE!!

So where was I supposed to show up to, DICKSUCKER?? AND WHEN!!!

You *** are NOTORIOUS for inventing **** that never happened, so now PROVE THAT I DIDN'T SHOW AND WHERE WAS I SUPPOSED TO BE!!

GO!!

Because I can tell you know, kicking YOUR *** would have been more than a **** pleasure and one you would NOT be here talking about since you wouldn't ever be here afterwards!!

Sucks huh??

Blackvegetable » 16 Jan 2025, 7:05 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 7:05 am

Read something more elevated than SPAM...

Yours are not the only posts I read, you idiot. 

Talk about self-obsessed. You're a true fruitcake.   

Fuelman » 16 Jan 2025, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 9:33 am

That's a lot of eggs! Making dog food?

No, I use eggs as currency. I give them to people who are hooking me up with stuff. For example, the local meat processor gives me free organ meat that customers decline. And the local coffee house gives me grounds that I use in my hen house. I have sand - not chips - under their roosts, and I add in coffee. I clean it out each morning with a cat litter shovel. The coffee grounds are super absorbent and get rid of odors. 
 

What Maher says does make sense. All organisms will try to survive. As for this one loss spelling the end of the Dem Party.. I will believe it when I see it. Every time that they have lost.. I hear the same thing and then later on, they win.

impartialobserver » 16 Jan 2025, 12:57 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 12:57 pm

What Maher says does make sense. All organisms will try to survive. As for this one loss spelling the end of the Dem Party.. I will believe it when I see it. Every time that they have lost.. I hear the same thing and then later on, they win.

When Bush won in 04 it was the end of the Dems.

When Obama won it was the end of the Pubs.

When the GOP won the house in 2010 it was the end of the Dems.

In most elections of the last decade it was the end of the losing party.

*Huey » 16 Jan 2025, 1:05 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 1:05 pm

When Bush won in 04 it was the end of the Dems.

When Obama won it was the end of the Pubs.

When the GOP won the house in 2010 it was the end of the Dems.

In most elections of the last decade it was the end of the losing party.

Exactly. No matter the exact form that it takes, there will always be a younger and/or more affluent portion of the electorate that leans left and the older and usually less affluent/urban (but not necessarily poor) that leans right. Neither part of the population is going to cease to exist. It just happens that in a given election, one candidate swings the balance one way or the other. 

impartialobserver » 16 Jan 2025, 1:08 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 1:08 pm

Exactly. No matter the exact form that it takes, there will always be a younger and/or more affluent portion of the electorate that leans left and the older and usually less affluent/urban (but not necessarily poor) that leans right. Neither part of the population is going to cease to exist. It just happens that in a given election, one candidate swings the balance one way or the other.

Pedophilia could break them, though. People are done with that ****. 
 


The whigs DID go out of business. It CAN happen. 

Cannonpointer » 16 Jan 2025, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 1:13 pm

Pedophilia could break them, though. People are done with that ****. 

The whigs DID go out of business. It CAN happen.

It could or the dems will move away from the positions that don't play well with the public.  DEI and the trans agenda being one of them.

Cannonpointer » 16 Jan 2025, 1:13 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 1:13 pm

Pedophilia could break them, though. People are done with that ****. 

The whigs DID go out of business. It CAN happen.

Hell, I remember the LWNJs telling us in this LAST election that MURDERING BABIES would be THE deciding factor in KommieLA winning!!

And that trannism and LBGTQ "rights" would be another BIG thing Democrats would win on.

Well, how'd that work out for them??

I can name names of the IDIOTS HERE than made those incessant **** claims too!!

*Huey » 16 Jan 2025, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 1:16 pm

It could or the dems will move away from the positions that don't play well with the public.  DEI and the trans agenda being one of them.

DEI and the trans agenda being one of them.

The mind reels.

Blackvegetable » 16 Jan 2025, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 3:36 pm

DEI and the trans agenda being one of them.

The mind reels.

How did that work out for your side?  And why do you have try and **** up a decent conversation?  Like I said, this all about disruption for you, Troll.

Blackvegetable » 16 Jan 2025, 3:36 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 3:36 pm

DEI and the trans agenda being one of them.

The mind reels.

*******!!

In case you missed it, the "trannie ****" and DEI are INTERLINKED and basically ONE IN THE SAME!! You can't have one without the other.

SHUT THE **** UP YOU PATHETIC PIECE OF **** MORON!!

*Beekeeper » 16 Jan 2025, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 3:40 pm

*******!!

In case you missed it, the "trannie ****" and DEI are INTERLINKED and basically ONE IN THE SAME!! You can't have one without the other.

SHUT THE **** UP YOU PATHETIC PIECE OF **** MORON!!

So **** g'ddammned stupid 
 

Blackvegetable » 16 Jan 2025, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 3:42 pm

I am so **** g'ddammned stupid

We know

*Huey » 16 Jan 2025, 3:40 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 3:40 pm

How did that work out for your side?  And why do you have try and **** up a decent conversation?  Like I said, this all about disruption for you, Troll.

Adult literacy?

I prefer it to the darkness of the alternative. 

A "decent conversation"?

It was an exchange of slogans.
 

Blackvegetable » 16 Jan 2025, 4:02 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 4:02 pm

Adult literacy?

I prefer it to the darkness of the alternative. 

A "decent conversation"?

It was an exchange of slogans.

Yawn.  Bring something to the table.  

Obviously, you did not read my entire conversation.  Par for the course.  Keep disrupting, Huckleberry.  I knew this would happen.  And you showed up...so predictable.

 

*Huey » 16 Jan 2025, 4:05 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 4:05 pm

Yawn.  Bring something to the table.  

Obviously, you did not read my entire conversation.  Par for the course.  Keep disrupting, Huckleberry.  I knew this would happen.  And you showed up...so predictable.

Tiny,

This "debate" is a fraud...

To see why, post the popular vote totals.

Blackvegetable » 16 Jan 2025, 4:07 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 4:07 pm

Tiny,

This "debate" is a fraud...

To see why, post the popular vote totals.

Nah, not here to discuss that.  I was discussing whether or not the dem party is dead.  

*Huey » 16 Jan 2025, 4:18 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 4:18 pm

Nah, not here to discuss that.  I was discussing whether or not the dem party is dead.

You're here for fraudulent debate.

Blackvegetable » 16 Jan 2025, 4:43 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Jan 2025, 4:43 pm

You're here for fraudulent debate.

Prove you aren't.