Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Just so you know, VOTERS want to PUNCH YOU DEMOCRATS IN THE FACE, not join you!!
Just so you know, VOTERS want to PUNCH YOU DEMOCRATS IN THE FACE, not join you!!
By *Beekeeper
15 Jan 2025 6:59 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
Today 7:28 am
Just post the numbers.*Huey » 44 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Please explain, in your own words, why I have to post the popular vote totals pertaining to what I posted about whether or not the dem party is over.
Today 7:30 am
I need to know why you are so insistent on making this on issue concerning a part of a conversation I was having. I need to ensure you understand what my position on it is.
BV sleep survey don't give a ****. viewtopic.php?p=2588518#p2588518
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV Absolves USSS: viewtopic.php?p=2585544#p2585544
The answer viewtopic.php?p=2573481#p2573481
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV Absolves USSS: viewtopic.php?p=2585544#p2585544
The answer viewtopic.php?p=2573481#p2573481
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Today 7:32 am
Post the numbers, THEN ask.*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I need to know why you are so insistent on making this on issue concerning a part of a conversation I was having. I need to ensure you understand what my position on it is.
Today 7:34 am
Why do you needs numbers...haven't you been watching the confirmation hearings?
The Democrats have been destroyed by the appointees at every turn......America has seen the problems Democrats have created and want nothing to do eith the lying, hypocritical scum.
Today 7:36 am
Literacy is only useful to those who can think.
And those who can think do not skirt hike and flee when asked questions pertinent to their sundry theses.
You are not a thinker, brown. You're a parroter of other things' ideas.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Today 7:39 am
Trump won the popular vote - in spite of a tsunami of lawfare that began precisely when he announced, and in spite of billions of dollars worth of indirect campaign contributions for camela through fake news and through soft balls and through fake "debates" and through bringing every child molester in hollywood to preen and badmouth trump and his voters.Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 4:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
This "debate" is a fraud...
To see why, post the popular vote totals.
The country said **** you - and you still parrot the **** the country said **** you to.
**** you, brown. You're a clown.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Today 7:40 am
Like when camela had speakers in her ears AND the questions in advance AND the "moderators" on her side.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Today 7:48 am
Nope, because it has NOTHING to do with what I was discussing. When you formulate an argument I might oblige you IF it has anything to do with my points.
BV sleep survey don't give a ****. viewtopic.php?p=2588518#p2588518
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV Absolves USSS: viewtopic.php?p=2585544#p2585544
The answer viewtopic.php?p=2573481#p2573481
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV Absolves USSS: viewtopic.php?p=2585544#p2585544
The answer viewtopic.php?p=2573481#p2573481
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Today 7:49 am
The vote totals speak to the history of the democrat party, you **** fingered midway rube - not to its future. Like I said before - you are not a thinker.
AFTER the loss comes the reckoning - not before the loss.
Many who voted dem did so ONLY because they because they believed it to be effective against the repukes - NOT because they felt represented by it. They saw it as the lesser evil. So the votes do not speak to what they will do next time - only to what they did last time.
The bernie bros could peel off. The greens could peel off. Now that the party is seen as incompetent to win even a totally fixed election in which the equivalent of BILLIONS in lawfare and BILLIONS in star power and BILLIONS in fake news and transparently fixed debates were given to the cackling blowjob queen, new patterns might just arise among the dems formerly captive base.
When fear and loathing of the other guy is the motive of a big percentage of your voters, you have to deliver or face defections, you level one fruitcake. The issue now is not WHETHER democrats will defect, but on how large a scale - you clown.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Today 7:49 am
America doesn't need a toothless sibling **** speaking for it.RebelGator » 18 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Why do you needs numbers...haven't you been watching the confirmation hearings?
The Democrats have been destroyed by the appointees at every turn......America has seen the problems Democrats have created and want nothing to do eith the lying, hypocritical scum.
Post the vote totals.
Today 7:50 am
At today's egg prices that sounds like a good deal for the people you barter with. Quite resourceful.Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑ No, I use eggs as currency. I give them to people who are hooking me up with stuff. For example, the local meat processor gives me free organ meat that customers decline. And the local coffee house gives me grounds that I use in my hen house. I have sand - not chips - under their roosts, and I add in coffee. I clean it out each morning with a cat litter shovel. The coffee grounds are super absorbent and get rid of odors.
Today 7:50 am
Blackvegetable » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ America doesn't need a toothless sibling **** speaking for it.
Post the vote totals.
Trump won the popular vote and the electoral vote.... deal with it libby
Today 7:50 am
How do you know?*Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Nope, because it has NOTHING to do with what I was discussing. When you formulate an argument I might oblige you IF it has anything to do with my points.
Post the thread title, followed by the vote totals.
Today 7:51 am
Today 7:52 am
COLOSTOMY LEAK ON AISLE 5!Cannonpointer » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ The vote totals speak to the history of the democrat party, you **** fingered midway rube - not to its future. Like I said before - you are not a thinker.
AFTER the loss comes the reckoning - not before the loss.
Many who voted dem did so ONLY because they because they believed it to be effective against the repukes - NOT because they felt represented by it. They saw it as the lesser evil. So the votes do not speak to what they will do next time - only to what they did last time.
The bernie bros could peel off. The greens could peel off. Now that the party is seen as incompetent to win even a totally fixed election in which the equivalent of BILLIONS in lawfare and BILLIONS in star power and BILLIONS in fake news and transparently fixed debates were given to the cackling blowjob queen, new patterns might just arise among the dems formerly captive base.
When fear and loathing of the other guy is the motive of a big percentage of your voters, you have to deliver or face defections, you level one fruitcake. The issue now is not WHETHER democrats will defect, but on how large a scale - you clown.
Today 7:52 am
I was in a discussion with another poster. I will not post anything you demand until you formulate an argument and explain how the numbers apply to my points.Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ How do you know?
Post the thread title, followed by the vote totals.
BV sleep survey don't give a ****. viewtopic.php?p=2588518#p2588518
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV Absolves USSS: viewtopic.php?p=2585544#p2585544
The answer viewtopic.php?p=2573481#p2573481
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV Absolves USSS: viewtopic.php?p=2585544#p2585544
The answer viewtopic.php?p=2573481#p2573481
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
Today 7:54 am
The evidence of whether the dem party is over. You don't seem to be reading his posts, either.*Huey » Today, 6:02 am » wrote: ↑ Evidence of what? I am telling you your lack or reading skills is embarrassing you and proving you are nothing. But a troll.
The fact is, this thread is speculative. But the speculation is not out of nowhere. There is good cause for a suspicion that the democrat party could be seriously damaged by this failure.
No deck has ever been more stacked, from the billions worth of star power to the billions worth of lawfare to the billions worth of fake news to the well remembered threats of street violence and press-driven/cop-ignored city burnings to the fixed debates in which the blowjob queen had the questions in advance, the mods on her side, and a prompter in her ear.
Trump still winning against all of that election interference and corruption has absolutely endangered the future of the party. Speculating on what they will do and whether it will mitigate the damage is a perfectly reasonable conversation.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Today 7:55 am
Post the thread title.*Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ I was in a discussion with another poster. I will not post anything you demand until you formulate an argument and explain how the numbers apply to my points.
Today 7:55 am
You have demonstrated innumeracy over and over again, brown.Blackvegetable » Today, 7:03 am » wrote: ↑ blah, blah, blah....
Post the vote totals...I'll do the math for you.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Today 7:56 am
Blackvegetable » Today, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑ I suggest you strive for coherence...
Then answer the question.
"Because I SAY I am" is fallacy, not science
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not your friend
An opinion you won't defend is not yours. It's someone else's.
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe.
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge.
Only religions declare heresy; only lies require protection.
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
Who is online
In total there are 841 users online :: 19 registered, 23 bots, and 799 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, HarperLee, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, ConservativeWave, *GHETTO BLASTER, FJB, *Beekeeper, Skans, murdock, LowIQTrash, PhiloBeddo, Cannonpointer, nefarious101, 31st Arrival, Fuelman
Bots: Go-http-client, DuckDuckBot, TTD-Content, facebookexternalhit, proximic, MQQBrowser, Feedfetcher-Google, Minefield, Not, YisouSpider, Baidu, app.hypefactors.com, YandexBot, Mediapartners-Google, ADmantX, semantic-visions.com, Applebot, Twitterbot, trendictionbot, linkfluence.com, curl/7, bingbot, Googlebot