Liberal Forum

RebelGator » Today, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:48 am

You run with idiots, you think like an idiot....you just needed someone to bitch-slap some sense into your head in your learning years.
 

Ever watch the movie "Cool Hand Luke". I know how humanity makes every brain get into its right mind.

Blackvegetable » 20 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

20 minutes ago

JUST POST YOUR SOURC3S

LMAO1

*Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

LMAO1

We all know what they are, right?

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

We all know what they are, right?

Nah, I really don't care.  Whatever they may be you believe him anyway.  Considering you are not even trying to prove him wrong I gotta with he is correct.

Carry on.

*Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Nah, I really don't care.  Whatever they may be you believe him anyway.  Considering you are not even trying to prove him wrong I gotta with he is correct.

Carry on.

Dumb little ****,

It isn't about "I assert, you must disprove".

It's about how ashamed you are about where you go to stoke your hate.
 

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Dumb little ****,

It isn't about "I assert, you must disprove".

It's about how ashamed you are about where you go to stoke your hate.

I am not ashamed at all about my sources.  Here ya go:

Straight from my sig box:

Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152

Add WAPO to the list if it is not there.  

For you it is about disruption.  

1.  You attack a source, real or perceived.

2.  You attack the poster.

3.  You whine that the post is a liar.

4.  You play whataboutism with something about Trump.

5.  You demand answers to irrelevant questions.


That is your posting style.



 

*Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

I am not ashamed at all about my sources.  Here ya go:

Straight from my sig box:

Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152

Add WAPO to the list if it is not there.  

For you it is about disruption.  

1.  You attack a source, real or perceived.

2.  You attack the poster.

3.  You whine that the post is a liar.

4.  You play whataboutism with something about Trump.

5.  You demand answers to irrelevant questions.

That is your posting style.

I asked Coozie for his sources....why are you here yapping?

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

I asked Coozie for his sources....why are you here yapping?

Sad you cant answer simple questions

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

I asked Coozie for his sources....why are you here yapping?

All I posted was LMAO!  Then you started to reply to me.

Stop playing Victim, Huckleberry.

But someone.  Give a brother some credit.  I ailed your posting style.  ;) 

This is gonna be a great 4 years.

3 days and a wake up, Huck.

FJB » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Sad you cant answer simple questions

*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

All I posted was LMAO!  Then you started to reply to me.

Stop playing Victim, Huckleberry.

But someone.  Give a brother some credit.  I ailed your posting style.   

This is gonna be a great 4 years.

3 days and a wake up, Huck.

You're a **** idiot 

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

You're a **** idiot

You are in the "attack the poster" phase....what number is that...

I thought the oligarch part of the speech was hilarious.  Do you think anyone checked that speech or they said **** it, it is only Joe?

*Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

You are in the "attack the poster" phase....what number is that...

I thought the oligarch part of the speech was hilarious.  Do you think anyone checked that speech or they said **** it, it is only Joe?

are you contesting the poiint?

then at worst I'm laboring the obvious. 
 

*Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

You are in the "attack the poster" phase....what number is that...

I thought the oligarch part of the speech was hilarious.  Do you think anyone checked that speech or they said **** it, it is only Joe?

very dark speech no joy 

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

are you contesting the poiint?

then at worst I'm laboring the obvious.

When you make a point, maybe.....

BuckNaked » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

3 minutes ago

very dark speech no joy

He is very bitter.  His legacy is ****.  Even 150 plus left leaning eggheads will be able to save it.

*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

When you make a point, maybe.....

What was "the point" of "LMAO!"?

Blackvegetable » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

What was "the point" of "LMAO!"?

I have to explain that?  LMAO!  

That is one of your 5 0r 6 tactics to avoid actual debate and discussion.  I was laughing because you continue to prove me right.

Are you ready to discuss the OP?

*Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

I have to explain that?  LMAO!  

That is one of your 5 0r 6 tactics to avoid actual debate and discussion.  I was laughing because you continue to prove me right.

Are you ready to discuss the OP?

How does that explain "LMAO"?

*Huey » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

He is very bitter.  His legacy is ****.  Even 150 plus left leaning eggheads will be able to save it.

Will or won’t?