Vegas » Yesterday, 3:42 pm » wrote: ↑ You are intentionally avoiding the point like the coward you are. How about you address his tantrum and acting like a 6th grader instead of bringing up the rant? A truly intelligent man with a high emotional IQ would simply have a discussion and intelligent debate about the disagreement. Musk is a child...like you. Period.
Instead , you prefer to defend his behavior.
I bet you perform fellatio on Musk daily. Do you also offer him prostate massages?
I win again. You lose.
Buffalo chips. defamation of character role playing cradle to grave. You dare expose anyone pretending now isn't eternity humanity will erase that person from history and current events not necessarily in that order.*Beekeeper » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Since when is a "rant" and a "tantrum" not one in the same with a different word attached?? Isn't your claim that they are different??
Fact is, Musk kicked Harris' *** and without ANY REAL EVIDENCE, Harris pulled a tantrum with some expose' that has ZERO real anything to support it EXCEPT some invented "text messages"!! You don't "win" with that kind of shoddy ****!! SCREENSHOTS and you might have something. OTHERWISE, you have Harris' word and that doesn't fly in ANY court of law!!
*Beekeeper » Today, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑ Since when is a "rant" and a "tantrum" not one in the same with a different word attached?? Isn't your claim that they are different??
Fact is, Musk kicked Harris' *** and without ANY REAL EVIDENCE, Harris pulled a tantrum with some expose' that has ZERO real anything to support it EXCEPT some invented "text messages"!! You don't "win" with that kind of shoddy ****!! SCREENSHOTS and you might have something. OTHERWISE, you have Harris' word and that doesn't fly in ANY court of law!!
Rhetorical Question,
Vegas » Today, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑ Look idiot, I don't know how else to say this. A person who says "**** YOU IN THE FACE" has the emotional IQ of a middle schooler still going through puberty. Period.
Musk - Middle schooler.*Beekeeper » Today, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑ YOU do??
Well, I won't argue against that one about you!!
Taking someone's invent "text messages" as "fact" when Harris is a KNOWN DOPER who loves his trips on dope, you REALLY have a problem. One that apparently isn't capable of being seen due TO your hate for Musk.
NO ONE can fix that one. So now, YOU LOSE!!
Vegas » Today, 12:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Musk - Middle schooler.
You lose, I win again. I curb stomped you three times now.
*Beekeeper » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You couldn't curb stomp a piss ant with arthritis, *******!!
Once AGAIN, where is your EVIDENCE that Musk actually sent those texts?? Oh wait, you have NOTHING. EVERYTHING you are claiming is based on what Harris WROTE, not actual screenshots of texts!! UNTIL THEN, you LOSE, *******!!
Now we call that a MASSIVE curb stomp that you are on the bottom!!
Wanna go for another round??