Liberal Forum

*Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Thank god!  You idiots act like the only thing he ever did was work for FOX.

Tens of thousands of majors..

It wasn't what qualified him for the Grifty administration. 

Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Tens of thousands of majors..

It wasn't what qualified him for the Grifty administration. 

 

If you say so....    

*Huey » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

If you say so....  

How many majors do you believe there are?

Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

Tens of thousands of majors..

It wasn't what qualified him for the Grifty administration.

So someone that lied about fighting in Vietnam is qualified to question Hegseth's patriotism?

Yeah...
That's liberalism for you..

Like Squatchman said...
Lying is "freedom of speech"
 

HarperLee » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

So someone that lied about fighting in Vietnam is qualified to question Hegseth's patriotism?

Yeah...
That's liberalism for you..

Like Squatchman said...
Lying is "freedom of speech"

What exactly did he question?

Why don't you fund your source and quote this scoundrel, verbatim?

Lying is "freedom of speech"

The FOXNews credo.

How many hours, Hole?

Blackvegetable » Today, 11:21 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:21 am

We do not. We live in a soap opera country. We live in a social media/cable TV country. In our culture you don’t want to focus on boring policy questions; you want to engage in the kind of endless culture war that gets voters riled up. You don’t want to focus on topics that would require study; you focus on images and easy-to-understand issues that generate instant visceral reactions. You don’t win this game by engaging in serious thought; you win by mere attitudinizing — by striking a pose. Your job is not to advance an argument that might help the country; your job is to go viral.

 Hegseth is, of course, the living, breathing embodiment of this culture. The world is on fire, and what’s his obsession? Wokeness in the military. I went through high school trying to bluff my way through class after doing none of the reading, and in Hegseth, I recognize a master of the craft. During the hearing he repeatedly said he was going to defend the meritocracy. In what kind of meritocracy is being a Fox TV host preparation for being secretary of defense? Maybe in the one Caligula fancied when he contemplated making his horse a consul.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/01/15/opin ... =url-share

I believe what Dave is getting at is that America deserves an Infotainment administration as good as its dumbasses on the margin.

Dave must be another regular reader of "The Blackvegetable Review"

No thoughts, etc...copy/paste. 

Vegas » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

No thoughts, etc...copy/paste.

Two months earlier....

https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=92204



Stuff like this makes chicks moist.

Blackvegetable » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Two months earlier....

https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=92204



Stuff like this makes chicks moist.

 

Prediction?  LMAO!  He already started naming his picks.


 

*Huey » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

Prediction?  LMAO!  He already started naming his picks.

How many?

Blackvegetable » 9 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

9 minutes ago

Two months earlier....

https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=92204

Stuff like this makes chicks moist.

Your still posting this ****? God you are so **** redundant. And you wonder how I have 100% accuracy on you. 

This prediction is not impressive. Trump has been friends with media personalities for decades. He used to have his own reality show. Why is it a surprise that he would choose them? It's not. 

Stop pretending your prediction was so profound. 

*Huey » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

12 minutes ago

Prediction?  LMAO!  He already started naming his picks.

I sense resignation in bVegetated's posts.....has he finally figured out the coronation is upon him?  

Vegas » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

5 minutes ago

Your still posting this ****? God you are so **** redundant. And you wonder how I have 100% accuracy on you. 

This prediction is not impressive. Trump has been friends with media personalities for decades. He used to have his own reality show. Why is it a surprise that he would choose them? It's not. 

Stop pretending your prediction was so profound.

we could go further back to making the point that no one of consequence would serve in his administration.

you, on the other hand, struggle with yesterday.
 

Blackvegetable » 1 minute ago » wrote: ↑

1 minute ago

we could go further back to making the point that no one of consequence would serve in his administration.

you, on the other hand, struggle with yesterday.

Your prediction is stupid. None of his choices should be a shock to anyone. Come up with something more profound. 

Blackvegetable » 30 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

30 minutes ago

What exactly did he question?

Why don't you find your source and quote this scoundrel, verbatim?

The FOXNews credo.

How many hours, Hole?

There's a video of the Democrat who LIED about going to Vietnam questioning Hegseth.

And it was Squatchman that stated lying is "freedom of speech"
 

5. Sen. Richard BlumenthalHow this guy even shows his face at a confirmation hearing is truly something to behold. Blumenthal, you may recall, lied repeatedly about serving in Vietnam despite never setting foot outside U.S. soil at the time. The Connecticut Democrat even went so far as to say he and other soldiers suffered "physical abuse" upon returning to the U.S. "I do not believe that you can tell this committee or the people of America that you are qualified to lead them. I would support you as a spokesperson for the Pentagon," Blumenthal piously said to Hegseth, without a hint of self-awareness, an actual veteran who served in Iraq and Afghanistan on multiple tours and earned two Bronze Stars and a Combat Infantryman Badge.

Blackvegetable » 11 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

11 minutes ago

How many?

 

That's like trying to place a pregame parlay after the game starts. 

Hey BV...
So Pete isn't qualified..??

How about these two?
Biden hired them


 

Blackvegetable » Today, 11:59 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 11:59 am

Well, it beats payroll contraction...

Thanks for the admission!

Fuelman » 40 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

40 minutes ago

Thanks for the admission!

It's something you would need to admit....


were you even vaguely familiar with the data.....you've been rewarding it.
 

*Huey » Today, 1:09 pm » wrote: ↑

Today, 1:09 pm

That's like trying to place a pregame parlay after the game starts.

How many?

Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

7 minutes ago

How many?

 

Nah, I am not getting into it with you.  As you just proved on the other thread you will lie and make **** up to divert and disrupt.  You want something post do it your **** self.