Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 29 Jan 2025, 7:00 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 7:00 am

Be quiet, ****..

You lied to Skans.

*Huey » 29 Jan 2025, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 8:20 am

You lied to Skans.

No...

You have no idea what happened. 

Now **** off.
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jan 2025, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 8:23 am

No...

You have no idea what happened. 

Now **** off.

Well, tell us your side, Retardo Suave.

Blackvegetable » 29 Jan 2025, 7:01 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 7:01 am

As the internet's punching bag, you aren't qualified to offer advice on Rhetoric.

nod.

*Huey avatar *Huey -1 8 minutes ago

Temperature's risin'...

BV is a **** POS liberal shill

*Huey » 29 Jan 2025, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 8:30 am

Well, tell us your side, Retardo Suave.

Why?

Blackvegetable » 29 Jan 2025, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 8:30 am

Temperature's risin'...

Nah, just civilly disagreeing with knowledge of the fact getting reddies pisses you off to the point you are gonna do that.  FUn to watch.

Blackvegetable » 29 Jan 2025, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 8:37 am

Why?

Just to see you take a stand concerning your implications.  
 

*Huey » 29 Jan 2025, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 8:37 am

Nah, just civilly disagreeing with knowledge of the fact getting reddies pisses you off to the point you are gonna do that.  FUn to watch.

:rofl:  

That's done with words....assuming you are capable. 

*Huey » 29 Jan 2025, 8:38 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 8:38 am

Just to see you take a stand concerning your implications.

**** off with that debunked crap, Tatty.

Tell ​​​​@Cannonpointer  to post the original page explaining the ban.

Blackvegetable » 29 Jan 2025, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 8:39 am

**** off with that debunked crap, Tatty.

Tell ​​​​@Cannonpointer  to post the original page explaining the ban.

look at bv the proven pathological liar crying... GOTTA LOVE IT

Blackvegetable » 29 Jan 2025, 8:38 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 8:38 am

 

That's done with words....assuming you are capable.

As  I have told you before that is a quick way to show disagreement without wasting forum space.  You want to post here put on your big boy pants.  
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jan 2025, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 8:39 am

**** off with that debunked crap, Tatty.

Tell ​​​​@Cannonpointer  to post the original page explaining the ban.

 

You are here throwing out these allegations.  That is your job, Lil Richard.

Cannonpointer » 28 Jan 2025, 7:40 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Jan 2025, 7:40 pm

He is lying outright. 

The R. Suave account is still perfectly functional.

He created the sok because he lost a foolish bet with Vegas and was banned for 30 days. When the 30 days were up, he went back to the beevee account.

I always find it interesting how few words it takes to state the truth.  The fewer words, the truer it likely is.
 
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jan 2025, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 8:39 am

**** off with that debunked crap, Tatty.

Tell ​​​​@Cannonpointer  to post the original page explaining the ban.

You post it if you want it posted, dick sucker.

No one fails to understand your transparent demands that others post for you.

Your intention is to imply that you have an argument, and that they know what it is. But if you HAD an argument, you'd MAKE the argument. Instead, you dishonestly imply that you COULD make an argument, if only your opponent would stop hiding the evidence.  
 

*Huey » 29 Jan 2025, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 8:52 am

You are here throwing out these allegations.  That is your job, Lil Richard.

He has no intention of making a case. He knows he's got nothing.

He wants to imply that there is a case to be made - that's as close to a W as the no-chops homo can get. 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 29 Jan 2025, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 10:11 am

You post it if you want it posted, dick sucker.

No one fails to understand your transparent demands that others post for you.

Your intention is to imply that you have an argument, and that they know what it is. But if you HAD an argument, you'd MAKE the argument. Instead, you dishonestly imply that you COULD make an argument, if only your opponent would stop hiding the evidence.

Don't yammer..

Do it, THEN comment.
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jan 2025, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 1:16 pm

Don't yammer..

Do it, THEN comment.

Look at this ****. Spewing out demands but refuses to provide any of his own thoughts on anything. Scum. 

Puke. Disgusting. 

*Huey » 29 Jan 2025, 8:52 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 8:52 am

You are here throwing out these allegations.  That is your job, Lil Richard.

This doesn't involve you, Tatty..

Blackvegetable » 29 Jan 2025, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jan 2025, 2:14 pm

This doesn't involve you, Tatty..

 

Sorry, this is not a private forum.