As I've told you, it is an admission that it took your head off...*Huey » Today, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑ As I have told you before that is a quick way to show disagreement without wasting forum space. You want to post here put on your big boy pants.
Blackvegetable » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ As I've told you, it is an admission that it took your head off...
Every context.
Does your rule apply to you?Blackvegetable » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ makes no difference....
It doesn't involve you.
You're a moron.
Nod.
Askholio...
You post it if you want it posted, dick sucker.Blackvegetable » Today, 1:16 pm » wrote: ↑Don't yammer..Cannonpointer » Today, 10:11 am » wrote: ↑ You post it if you want it posted, dick sucker.
No one fails to understand your transparent demands that others post for you.
Your intention is to imply that you have an argument, and that they know what it is. But if you HAD an argument, you'd MAKE the argument. Instead, you dishonestly imply that you COULD make an argument, if only your opponent would stop hiding the evidence.
Do it, THEN comment.
You've made a total mess of the member registry.Cannonpointer » Today, 6:35 pm » wrote: ↑ You post it if you want it posted, dick sucker.
No one fails to understand your transparent demands that others post for you.
Your intention is to imply that you have an argument, and that they know what it is. But if you HAD an argument, you'd MAKE the argument. Instead, you dishonestly imply that you COULD make an argument, if only your opponent would stop hiding the evidence.
https://youtu.be/_JoZS6LgqYI?si=8pjGDa1J5Ir6iChICannonpointer » Today, 6:35 pm » wrote: ↑ You post it if you want it posted, dick sucker.
No one fails to understand your transparent demands that others post for you.
Your intention is to imply that you have an argument, and that they know what it is. But if you HAD an argument, you'd MAKE the argument. Instead, you dishonestly imply that you COULD make an argument, if only your opponent would stop hiding the evidence.
You give me way too much credit.
Cannonpointer » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You give me way too much credit.
What's a "member registry"?
You should be posting your evidence instead of begging others to do it for you.
This, bitch?Cannonpointer » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You should be posting your evidence instead of begging others to do it for you.
Are you a chick?
That's a cute little meskin. Wouldn't it be cool if he was one of the folks caught up in Trump's raids?
Lol - you manipulating mother ****. If I permanently banned your account, how are you posting on it?
Put down the trowel.Cannonpointer » Today, 8:03 pm » wrote: ↑ Lol - you manipulating mother ****. If I permanently banned your account, how are you posting on it?
That CANNOT have been addressed to anyone except you or vegas giants, because you two are the only stupid mother **** who let him shimmy up on ya. And YOU were only suspended for 30 days.
Is this your admission that vegas giants was your sok?
She has my sympathy, you bamboozling ****.Blackvegetable » 48 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Put down the trowel.
Acknowledge that you are a resentful, lying little **** unworthy even of my indifference.
Skans » 28 Jan 2025, 3:45 pm » wrote: ↑ Only pussies worry about up votes and down votes. This isn't Reddit, dummy!!!