than you? no doubt...
No, no. Read my post again.Fuelman » 27 Jan 2025, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑ All good points CP. It is unfortunate that those calamities blindsided the regulators. They probably thought they had it covered.
The notion that in order to stop piracy we have to micro-manage regular joes is part and parcel of the afore-mentioned mesmerization.Fuelman » 27 Jan 2025, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑ Maybe we would be better off just regulating everything all the way down to how many liters of oxygen each person breathes each day and start working backwards.
Govt was once for the people...then was coopted by CORPS.Cannonpointer » 27 Jan 2025, 8:50 pm » wrote: ↑ No, no. Read my post again.
The regulators DID have it covered.
For fifty **** years. The regulations ushered in the biggest boom in America history. FDR's game rules CREATED the American middle class. Getting off those game rules was the beginning of the end of that middle class. It has been in retreat since.
It was the DE-regulators who **** it off - not the regulators. And they were not "blind-sided. " They struck with nintendo-like precision. Mesmerized yahoos cheering for any and all "deregalayshun" were blind sided - right in the brown eye.
The notion that in order to stop piracy we have to micro-manage regular joes is part and parcel of the afore-mentioned mesmerization.
One of my oft-repeated observations about economy is this:Sumela » 27 Jan 2025, 10:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Govt was once for the people...then was coopted by CORPS.
Then Limbaugh convinced cons that CORPS love the people.
I bought into it myself.
....54,000 layoffs coming in Germany......Cannonpointer » 27 Jan 2025, 10:15 pm » wrote: ↑ One of my oft-repeated observations about economy is this:
Free Enterprise serves the market to dominate the competition.
Capitalism dominates the market by outlawing the competition.
We can see this in action very recently, when the U.S. government resorted to terrorism on behalf of American corporations by blowing up the Nordstream. Using this terrorist event along with sanctions and propaganda and having their proxy in ukraine shut down the last remaining pipeline to Europe, the US dominated the market by destroying and outlawing the competition. Now euro-peons have to pay three times the price - which turned Germany from the strongman of Europe to the sick man of Europe.
Capitalism always comes knocking with a gun in its hand.
You people "Forget" The Upper Midwest.Squatchman » 26 Jan 2025, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑ He' s ****.
Come 2026 Democrats will take back the Senate.
In 2028 they take it all.
Not my problem.
Here's the deal, brown...if you really had something, you'd do it, ****...keep hiding, pretender...
I see the problem...you easily "buy into ****"...Sumela » 27 Jan 2025, 10:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Govt was once for the people...then was coopted by CORPS.
Then Limbaugh convinced cons that CORPS love the people.
I bought into it myself.
the **** clings to obfuscation...*Huey » 28 Jan 2025, 6:08 am » wrote: ↑ Hey ****, stop spamming with that. I have already posted those for you and they show that the Pub candidate won the popular vote, the first time since 2004, and you admitted that the dems LOST roughly 10 million popular votes. Do you realize how stupid you’ll continually demanding those numbers? Although the popular isn’t the determining number.
The 312 number is. And the fa cat he won ALL swing states. Or the fact that in most demo groups the right got MORE votes than ever.
It was a complete smack down of what you support, punk.
Glorious!
Eat ****.ROG62 » 28 Jan 2025, 6:56 am » wrote: ↑ Here's the deal brown...if you really had something, you'd do it, ****...keep hiding, pretender...
*Huey » 28 Jan 2025, 6:08 am » wrote: ↑ Hey ****, stop spamming with that. I have already posted those for you and they show that the Pub candidate won the popular vote, the first time since 2004, and you admitted that the dems LOST roughly 10 million popular votes. Do you realize how stupid you’ll continually demanding those numbers? Although the popular isn’t the determining number.
The 312 number is. And the fa cat he won ALL swing states. Or the fact that in most demo groups the right got MORE votes than ever.
It was a complete smack down of what you support, punk.
Tiny little stalking arsewipe Controlly...*Huey » 28 Jan 2025, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑ You have already been given this info.
Hey ****, stop spamming with that. I have already posted those for you and they show that the Pub candidate won the popular vote, the first time since 2004, and you admitted that the dems LOST roughly 10 million popular votes. Do you realize how stupid you’ll continually demanding those numbers? Although the popular isn’t the determining number.
The 312 number is. And the fa cat he won ALL swing states. Or the fact that in most demo groups the right got MORE votes than ever.
It was a complete smack down of what you support, punk.
Since you been given the numbers you can stop asking.Blackvegetable » 28 Jan 2025, 7:36 am » wrote: ↑ Tiny little stalking arsewipe Controlly...
Post the rule.
Is that the rule?