So when joe was sending $50-100bn to Ukraine every other week or "forgiving student loans" bi-monthly, were those approved by congress?jerrab » Today, 5:10 am » wrote: ↑ Setting a precedent:
By refusing to become king, Washington established a crucial standard for future leaders, emphasizing the importance of limited power and civilian control
ROG62 » Today, 6:43 am » wrote: ↑ So when joe was sending $50-100bn to Ukraine every other week or "forgiving student loans" bi-monthly, were those approved by congress?
You voted for him, you lying bitch.jerrab » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ trump went against passed laws, the constitution, and congress.
and quit bringing up biden. he means **** to me. he was awful and I don't defend him like you defend trump continuously
Now, you claim you voted for Trump?
jerrab » Today, 4:44 am » wrote: ↑ https://coloradonewsline.com/2025/01/28 ... -payments/
Article I, Section 9, Clause 7 of the Constitution gives Congress the so-called “power of the purse” by granting it the authority to approve federal spending. Congress has passed several laws regarding that constitutional authority, including the 1974 Impoundment Control Act, which says that the president cannot simply refuse to spend money Congress has appropriated.Trump’s pick for OMB Director, Russ Vought, has repeatedly called that law unconstitutional and said he believes the president does have the authority to simply ignore sections of spending law that have been passed by Congress and signed into law.----------------really? jerra-----The Senate has yet to confirm Vought to the role of White House budget director, but is likely to do so in the weeks ahead.
Nope they were "Not" thats why a "Court" can go back & "Cancel"ROG62 » Today, 6:43 am » wrote: ↑ So when joe was sending $50-100bn to Ukraine every other week or "forgiving student loans" bi-monthly, were those approved by congress?
Sure thing, while I'm doing that, you can send Kameltoe some money.....she only blew $2 Billion last time.jerrab » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ stick to defending your orange buffoon who calls a constitutional law unconstitutional.
show me where this is uninformed or admit that you are uninformednefarious101 » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Don't pay any attention to this radicalized idiot....he's an uninformed 6th grader
Since you claim not voting for either, you have no stake in a discussion, so just STFU!
Presidential powers have become unconstitutionally stronger with each President...
RebelGator » 12 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Sure thing, while I'm doing that, you can send Kameltoe some money.....she only blew $2 Billion last time.
You're the Democrat, Princess.jerrab » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ sounds like you know all about giving her money. how much did you give her?
nefarious101 » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ You have an opinion....big deal....your opinion isn't a fact....it's nothing but an opinion